Not accepted otherwise Mihawk would be listed as a "Proficient Kenbunshoku" user but he isn't, rather he's just listed as a user without any tier.
Assumptions are being made
You're right we should go by the profiles, I'll make a CRT to remove Rogers Observation and update Mihawk's.
Feel free, though I agree with LordGinSama in that this match shouldn't be a thing until we actually know what both combatants can really do, so yeah, the OP can disregard my vote.
Gonna cry about it? The scaling is like this because it's legitimately done, Mihawk > Shanks who's relative to whitebeard who's relative to Gol D. Roger, and this is by what's currently stated in the show and databooks. So no, the scaling isn't bad currently, we still haven't even seen roger's full-on capabilities, so whoever made this fight, shouldn't have in the first place.
Where in the show is it stated oh and you things are world strongest swordman which Roger is superior to Kaido and Whitebeard who using their titles would be far superior to that. For some reason Primebeard and Old whitebeard are the exact same as well on the wiki
First things first, One Piece isn't a show its a Manga. Secondly Kaido's and Roger's titles are irrelevant when it comes to anything here. Last but not least we have direct statements from Oda himself and the Databooks stating Whitebeard has his strength from his younger years. Marineford Whitebeard is only sick albeit fatally so and has issues with his Haki, his might still remains the same.
Haki buffs attacks so he is weaker you just admitted it
Vandilized you mean removed a non accepted CRT
Thankfully Whitebeard's rating has nothing to do with Haki, and no i didn't admit anything. That's you intentionally twisting my words to fit your own narrative, his Haki is weaker, not his physical might.
Nope, it was textbook definition of vandalism. You altered a profile without staff input several times and they literally banned you for those same exact reasons. This is someone in denial if I've ever seen it.
Haki+Quakes>Quakes
You don't even know what happened
Oda stated that Whitebeard maintained his strength, and is as strong as he was before. Roger is RELATIVE to whitebeard, titles don't mean anything here. Mihawk > Shanks who's relative to roger and whitebeard, and they were all stated to be. So, do you have anyway to debunk given statements, or are you going to cry more?
And how is Mihawk>Shanks. Oh wait its you using his title
Irrelevant i never said that they weren't, this is a moot point as Whitebeard didn't use Haki on his quakes.
I was present for the RV thread, I know everything that happened there. King is a lot more trustworthy than you are, and is a staff member. Also a good friend of mine, he didn't get you banned because you disagree. You act like a child, hence why staff banned you.
Sure thing.
What wincon does Roger even have?
He uses Haki on his quake punches
Oh so someone defending his friend who would have guessed.
This is the CRT why Mihawk > Shanks
He couldn't even use Haki properly in Marineford Haki gives a buff
Yeah, but haki AMPS your stats. Base primebeard is equivalent to base oldbeard, same thing with their devil fruits. If oldbeard used haki, he would be equivalent.
Oldbeard cannot use it properly most of the time so Shanks only scales to him without it
There's a literal translation showing Shanks isn't as strong as mihawk anymore.
Shanks has already been stated to be as powerful as whitebeard, in general, nothing else was implied, this would also be the case of whitebeard's power as a whole, the statement doesn't say "Shanks scales to only base WB" or "Shanks only scales to his DF", no it says he scales to him as a WHOLE. Whitebeard was sick, we don't fully know as to why he didn't use haki, but we know he has it, not to mention he was sick after throwing up. You don't have anyway to disprove shanks scaling to Whitebeard. Not to mention, all yonko are ALREADY stated to be rivals, and are relative to one another.
As powerful in what regard it isn't clear your scaling comes from super vague statements and he clashed with Shanks when he was old without using both types
Not clear at all it goes around it just saying no more foes which could refer to him not having an arm anymore as it wouldn't be a swordfight at that point
Comes from Marineford one of them is him trying to use conquerors but can't
They clashed evenly, but were stated relative. Vague statements wouldn't really matter here, because there's more than ONE statement of them being relative, so that does NOT matter.
Clashed evenly when Whitebeard wasn't using any Haki
Because a normal member cannot overpower what a mod says
Mihawk wasn't trying on vista, plus they were clashing while Mihawk was mainly focused on Luffy.
Why do you keep talking about them clashing? There's other statements that say they are relative.
That wasn't due to him being unable to in his old age, it was because at that moment he had a heart attack due to the stab wound from squard and having his chest being punched through with magma.
lol that is ur own head canon
Debunking a mod doesn't freaking matter. If they don't want you to succeed you won't. Clashing showing that Whitebeard with nothing = Shanks
Shanks to WB has statements, no ONE is talking about the clash, same thing with Mihawk being above shanks, why don't you go to that CRT and see what it actually said, clearly you're just not looking at anything provided towards. Mihawk and Vista don't scale to one another, they simply just clashed, while Mihawk wasn't even trying, he was focused on Luffy. They were not shown equal, statements already debunk that premise of yours completely.
Do you even listen to what anyone says? I said theres MULTIPLE statements, not just the clashing.
The clashing shows what they actually mean. The statements are vague and using the clashing shanks = no haki whitebead
Again irrelevant, Whitebeard didn't use Haki for his 6-B feat. That's a result of him casually flexing on the Navy, said flex was just a result of him punching lightly with 2 arms. Nothing Haki rated here .
Not defending a friend, you were inherently wrong as evident in the RV thread there nobody agreed with you.
Cue the guy in court flipping his shit over a life sentence for murder "The judge and jury are a bunch of ******* lying amphibians and this is all a set".
They clashed without any context behind it, there's other statements given out afterwards, so I don't know why you continue to say this. It doesn't matter if they're vague or not, they're still referring to the people as a whole, this would include everything in their arsenal.
