"Ah i see you are still throwing a fit. Erza has an stronger AP because of a multiplier, take that away and she would still be High 7A. Yeah u need to read a bit more since what i said above (my example) should matter in this process. "
No one's throwing a fit, I am just amazed at the lack of self awareness you are displaying. And guess what, it's still a feat above Irene's. What point of it being a higher feat do you not understand. You are trying to be snarky when the evidence doesn't go to your side. It being a multiplier is irrelevant here as she still scales to someone stronger than Irene by feats and thus by feats and scaling she is also stronger than Irene. This is so simple.
"Anyways since apparently u still need a bottle and a bib and i can feel the anger from a kid who doesnt know how to argue normally ill stop since Calaca and David gave me a reason why Mitch is correct. Come back to hold another argument when you are done getting mad"
Oh my this hurts me so much. What a masterful argument. Keep up the non-arguments please. Also, my arguments were the same as theirs? Like, you tell me to read when you haven't read a single one of my arguments. Your avoiding my points in order to try and be a snarky asshole when in truth you look like an absolute fool. Next time address my points. And to prove you haven't read a single thing I said, let's quote Calaca, David and myself shall we?
David Argument #1: "Erza is far stronger than she was a year ago, that is all that we need to consider,"
My Argument: "BlackeJan you're comparing a younger Erza to a current Erza whose feats outrank her younger self".
David Argument #2: "Current Erza and past Erza are being compared because they are all that is relevant to the scaling, Irene isn't."
My Argument: "but the fact that she flat out has higher feats and scaling in the arc is what puts her above base Irene who is not in this arc."
My Argument: "No, we are using current feats that don't involve Irene."
Calaca's Argument #1: "We scale 100YQ characters to 6-C by the fact that Natsu beat someone with added powers up to 4x. That's all you need to know about the scaling."
My Argument: "but the fact that she flat out has higher feats and scaling in the arc is what puts her above base Irene who is not in this arc. We've been saying this the entire time."
My Argument: "Yeah, and guess what, it's above Irene's feats. Mulitplier or not, it's still a feat. Ergo it's a feat above Irene who has nothing to prove she scales. This doesn't change my argument"
Calaca Argument #2: " Arguing that they are not because some dead woman was X strong before isn't correct,"
My Argument: "but the fact that she flat out has higher feats and scaling in the arc is what puts her above base Irene who is not in this arc. We've been saying this the entire time." (This is the third time I've had to post this comment BlackeJan...)
Yup, I'm the one who needs to read more. Please, you haven't even paid attention to any of my argument. Drop it as you are blatantly in the wrong.