all of them get a bad rep via not being the "original" while also in the "all remakes are bad" era of film thought, but honestly all of them are pretty decent, imho
Texas Chainsaw Massacre, would be a solid 8/10 and while being a remake, it's actually more of an alternate timeline/reboot, as it's a completely different story for the most part outside of a couple little things, while upping the griminess and gore of the original.
Rob Zombie in general gets really shit on as a director but he also has an incredibly specific style of filming where every frame of every movie he does radiates with his love for grindhouse, 70's horror and comedy and the like, and his take on Halloween is no different, it's also by far the most closest to the original film, with a majority of the scenes being shot for shot albeit in a grittier fashion. It was trying to do something different with it's Michael Myers and I think it did it successfully, and the sequel while not for everyone, is a great arthouse film based around psychology and drenched in symbolism and metaphor, the duology isn't for everyone but objectively I'd give the first one a 6/10 and the second one a 7/10
Friday the 13th 2009 is a great rapid fire retelling of not only the first Friday the 13th film but actually Parts 1,2 AND 3, giving you a condensed and concise more grounded take on the story, with plenty of hardcore kills and even a decent few surprises, it also gave Jason one of the rawest redesigns ever, completely re-doing his "baghead" design into one of the scariest looking slashers (man do I wish they kept the new baghead design for a bit longer.) Over all I'd probably treat it as the best of the "big four" remakes and a great way of catching people up on Jason's backstory without having to watch the first 3 films, (though I still heavily recommend them) 8/10
Nightmare on Elm Street definitely was an interesting one, it tried to do a lot different and a lot the same and the results are mixed, the CGI definitely suffers from early 2000s CGI and they use it LIBERALLY in the film, and a lot of the creativity of Freddy's kills are reduced to gory slashings for better or worse. While Robery Englund controversially wasn't Freddy in it, I also don't necessarily think that's a bad thing (it's a remake for a reason people) but Freddy in the remake is almost an entirely different character in general, much more withdrawn personality wise and the rare quips have a more serious sinister tone to them. They also gave an interesting twist in the story of the teens trying to figure out if Freddy actually was innocent of his crimes in life, calling into question the vigilante/mob storyline of the original, but also more explicitly make Freddy a literal pedophile (in the original films he was just a child murderer, but they make it pretty clear in the remake he sexually assaulted the main characters as little children......yikes....) Overall this is the weakest in my mind of the remakes, not bad, but it felt like just a cheaper, edgier version of the original despite some really great performances, 6/10