- 7,836
- 14,855
Is this dream quote meant to be the proof of higher layers or is there something I'm missing?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is this dream quote meant to be the proof of higher layers or is there something I'm missing?
I asked him about it in a two-part comment. He said “it all” is part of God's dream as referenced to me mentioned if they are layers of transcendence and spiritual journey to be one with Oneness. He combined all three of my options.Is this dream quote meant to be the proof of higher layers or is there something I'm missing?
but thats what hes trying to say tho...Right but his words don't really reflect that.
Okay. Never mind then.Right but his words don't really reflect that. He basically just said "it's all a dream. God is the only true reality."
IMO far far too vague to apply to anything.
I don't think Deagon understood especially once I clarified it. Qwas isn't opposed to it. Please stop rushing these and just go with their words when they're not fully disagreeing.Okay. Never mind then.
Thank you for helping out to you and Qawsedf234.
Then you would know what I was trying to say. What you interpret of the scan was not really indicative of whether these planes are transcendent of each other.Goofy, I understood what you meant. I just don't agree with using it.
This whole thread has become such a mess that I don't see us making that many changes to DeMatteis's cosmology here. However, leaving the ratings as they are now is unacceptable, as they're plainly unjustified and contradictory. I would advise that we simply apply what I proposed in my OP (Remove "High 1-B" from Heaven, "possibly 1-C" from Mahapralaya, and "possibly High 1-C" from the Divine Presence) as our provisional tiers and leave further overhauls to DeMatteis's cosmology for future threads, preferably after we collectively do a lot more research.@Deagonx @Elizio33 @Firestorm808 @PrinceofPein @Qawsedf234 @Eficiente
What do you think that we should do here?
I have no idea which posts are relevant now. What I was proposing in the OP was a bare minimum of necessary changes that were meant to serve as a provisional tier. We should apply them for now and close this thread, after which someone else can make a new thread to further discuss DeMattis's cosmology, and there definitely shouldn't be any more debate here.This thread no longer has a head or tail, is the OP still proposing the same thing or has some changes been made so far?
If possible can you link the relevant posts or a new thread with the proper arguments can be made.
@Antvasima Is this acceptable to apply? Nobody seems interested in commenting here anymore, and I just want to do the bare minimum of changes and close this.This whole thread has become such a mess that I don't see us making that many changes to DeMatteis's cosmology here. However, leaving the ratings as they are now is unacceptable, as they're plainly unjustified and contradictory. I would advise that we simply apply what I proposed in my OP (Remove "High 1-B" from Heaven, "possibly 1-C" from Mahapralaya, and "possibly High 1-C" from the Divine Presence) as our provisional tiers and leave further overhauls to DeMatteis's cosmology for future threads, preferably after we collectively do a lot more research.
This whole thread has become such a mess that I don't see us making that many changes to DeMatteis's cosmology here. However, leaving the ratings as they are now is unacceptable, as they're plainly unjustified and contradictory. I would advise that we simply apply what I proposed in my OP (Remove "High 1-B" from Heaven, "possibly 1-C" from Mahapralaya, and "possibly High 1-C" from the Divine Presence) as our provisional tiers and leave further overhauls to DeMatteis's cosmology for future threads, preferably after we collectively do a lot more research.
Probably, yes, but I would prefer more staff input first.@Antvasima Is this acceptable to apply? Nobody seems interested in commenting here anymore, and I just want to do the bare minimum of changes and close this.
Makes sense to meThis whole thread has become such a mess that I don't see us making that many changes to DeMatteis's cosmology here. However, leaving the ratings as they are now is unacceptable, as they're plainly unjustified and contradictory. I would advise that we simply apply what I proposed in my OP (Remove "High 1-B" from Heaven, "possibly 1-C" from Mahapralaya, and "possibly High 1-C" from the Divine Presence) as our provisional tiers and leave further overhauls to DeMatteis's cosmology for future threads, preferably after we collectively do a lot more research.
@Deagonx @Elizio33 @Firestorm808 @PrinceofPein @Qawsedf234 @Eficiente Is this acceptable to you?
I could do it, as the changes are extremely simple. This change also doesn't actually affect any profiles, as we don't have profiles for Heaven, Mahapralalya, and the Divine Presence or any characters who scale to them.Are you willing to revise the following page accordingly, as well as all of our affected character profile pages, @Elizio33 ?
DC Comics Cosmology
This page is dedicated to outlining the distinctions between DC Comics's different cosmologies. To summarize, the DC Universe has three dominant cosmologies characterized primarily (but not exclusively) by their authors: Grant Morrison, Scott Snyder, James Tynion IV, and Joshua Williamson; J.M...vsbattles.fandom.com
Done.Okay. That is good then. However, you need to make sure that your edits are properly structured and explained well.
Tell us here when you are done please, so we can check if they seem acceptable.
That can be discussed in a new thread. These are just provisional tiers.Should stay High 1-B but ok.
No, this thread is too messy for us to use.We've discussed the issue on this thread. To make another thread is very unnecessary and repetitive.
Should stay High 1-B but ok.
Which staff members have thought what here?We've discussed the issue on this thread. To make another thread is very unnecessary and repetitive.
Elizio33 agreed to applying my changes and then closing this because, as I said, this thread has become far too messy to use. Nobody else seems interested in commenting, so I do believe we should have this thread closed now.Which staff members have thought what here?
@Elizio33Elizio33 agreed to applying my changes and then closing this because, as I said, this thread has become far too messy to use. Nobody else seems interested in commenting, so I do believe we should have this thread closed now.
I already have.
I could do it, as the changes are extremely simple. This change also doesn't actually affect any profiles, as we don't have profiles for Heaven, Mahapralalya, and the Divine Presence or any characters who scale to them.
Done.
DC Comics Cosmology
This page is dedicated to outlining the distinctions between DC Comics's different cosmologies. To summarize, the DC Universe has three dominant cosmologies characterized primarily (but not exclusively) by their authors: Grant Morrison, Scott Snyder, James Tynion IV, and Joshua Williamson; J.M...vsbattles.fandom.com
@Deagonx @Elizio33 @PrinceofPein @Eficiente @Firestorm808Done.
DC Comics Cosmology
This page is dedicated to outlining the distinctions between DC Comics's different cosmologies. To summarize, the DC Universe has three dominant cosmologies characterized primarily (but not exclusively) by their authors: Grant Morrison, Scott Snyder, James Tynion IV, and Joshua Williamson; J.M...vsbattles.fandom.com