- 2,127
- 1,726
This looks best.What about "at least 2-B, possibly 2-A"?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This looks best.What about "at least 2-B, possibly 2-A"?
OkIm in favor of 2A, so put me there, i purposed the possibly because some people apparently think its a hyperbolic statement (although it comes from someone who's supposedly very intelligent???)
It’s because it clashes with Ben stating millions, whereas if infinite just means very large it doesn’tIm in favor of 2A, so put me there, i purposed the possibly because some people apparently think its a hyperbolic statement (although it comes from someone who's supposedly very intelligent???)
Millions doesn't clashes like in dc infinite crises they have statement like "millions of universes", millions in the sense of so many universes, it doesn't have end as well as it's not exact few millions but unknown and then "infinite", but consistency mattersIt’s because it clashes with Ben stating millions, whereas if infinite just means very large it doesn’t
So should I remove seprate slots of 2a and 2b?A "possibly" should do the job, then
Yes, I also agree with the premise and it's quite obvious that 'infinite' here used for 'too many' than something literal, but as it was having conflict in the crt I was having hard time explaining it but ppl were still arguing, so @Sus suggested that "possibly" can be used and possibly does used here to used for something hinted but do not have enough evidence to be applied, so it was a good way to end the conflict.It makes more sense that it's just 2-B than what's written in the revision. If we use the word "infinite" in the sense of "too much, cannot calculate, immeasure...", we will not have to ignore the expression "millions of dimensions".
The proposal is for "universe" to be a 2b to possibly 2a structure by containing millions of dimensions/spacetime continuum's or maybe infinite.Can you re-phrase what the proposal is about?
Maybe, it makes sense from that interpretation. Nice guy.I think Ben’s the one lowballing the amount of dimensions and using it casually whereas Holiday is scientifically stating that there are infinite tbf.
It was because "dimensions" were not reffering to higher ones without proof.
Oh actually it was explicitly referring to higher ones, it just doesn’t add anything.
Doesn't matter you're the most nice guy I've seen
Sure my lordYes, as long as you don’t get in my way too much. I wanna see how you handle the timelines after this. Then I’ll clean up your mess.
Provide the scans...Or Just do 2-A. I mean Holiday is arguably more reliable then Ben given her experience and an expert in the science field with multiversal cosmology. Also It's been a bunch of times I recall in that show that there are infinite timelines.
What I found so far is that 2 WOGs have stated that the multiverse is infinite in size. We could back it up with the in-universe statement from Holiday. There's more scans and I'm currently finding them.Provide the scans...
The Rex dimension, dimension 12 and legerdomain has been accepted to be the part of the universe in the previous thread mentioned in the op. And all the dimensions crossover is concerned/seen to deal with are "in universe" dimensions, neither dimensional disruptor whose functioning is same as nullvoid projector should be capable of connecting universes because if so then Kevin would have been aware of another universes. So this is headcanon to consider them outside universes, occum's Razer.Why is is assumed that the “universe” itself has infinite dimensions? There was only proof of the null void being part of the prime universe. So where’s the proof that all these dimensions are in a single universe?
They've also said infinite multiple tiA=youtube]0_Y-oTV9LtU[/MEDIA]
There also had been shown to be that there are universes branching off.
No they haven’t. It’s nowhere in the OP and they were never mentioned.The Rex dimension, dimension 12 and legerdomain has been accepted to be the part of the universe in the previous thread mentioned in the op.
I’ve look at the thread and the cosmology blog. There was only evidence provided for the null void. The other dimensions aren’t even mentioned.And all the dimensions crossover is concerned/seen to deal with are "in universe" dimensions, neither dimensional disruptor whose functioning is same as nullvoid projector should be capable of connecting universes because if so then Kevin would have been aware of another universes. So this is headcanon to consider them outside universes, occum's Razer.
Now this… this CRT is about to get very interesting.Why is is assumed that the “universe” itself has infinite dimensions? There was only proof of the null void being part of the prime universe. So where’s the proof that all these dimensions are in a single universe?
She briefly dealt with it with Breach iirc or well Rex did and could/should have told her. I can also scale her off of extraordinary/supergeniuses which would entail her being able to deduce the size of the cosmology after having the multiverse being confirmed as real. Also Caesar could have just told her about this stuff off-screen. I don’t think it’ll be too relevant in this CRT though since Zamasu is questioning Reiner’s previous CRT now, so I’ll hold off with the evidence for now.has Holiday studied universe/dimension
Ledgerdomain and Dimension 12 don't have confirmed universe sizes, and time doesn’t even exist in D12 (IIRC), so it doesn’t have much of an impact. Even then, evidence was provided for those two existing in the universe. My main issue comes from Rex's universe, and other dimensions, being assumed to be in the prime universe because "there's no reason why it shouldn’t" despite there being 0 proof.What are you gonna do now? Technically you need to make another CRT, curious for your counter-arguments though.
Oh quite amusing for me considering it's already accepted and done, anyway this thread is not for discussing already accepted crt's.No they haven’t. It’s nowhere in the OP and they were never mentioned
Not my problem to deal with already dealt things. I can't go explaining things already been accepted to each one who don't find it convincing or smth. You need to deal with them yourself.I’ve look at the thread and the cosmology blog. There was only evidence provided for the null void. The other dimensions aren’t even mentioned.