- 2,161
- 2,353
Think it’s getting worse. It’s taking me eight to ten seconds just to go to different threads when I press them.I'm also having lag... I thought it was my internet but it's at maximum as always.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Think it’s getting worse. It’s taking me eight to ten seconds just to go to different threads when I press them.I'm also having lag... I thought it was my internet but it's at maximum as always.
What's happening with the lag mate?I will handle it.
I went to like these comments and even that took like 2-3 seconds to register.What's happening with the lag mate?
Unlocked
I mean theres no other character on the wiki it clashes with right now, but makes sense. I'd rather someone found a new picture for her thoughRequest for moving Mayday to Mayday (No Straight Roads) because Mayday is likely a common name
BumpThis CRT can be closed. Because of the reason firestorm stated, also that this thread lacks any form of proper evidence or reasoning as per our standards.
https://vsbattles.com/threads/ben-10-cosmology-addition.148480/
Gfycat? Is it not allowed here?Hey so on Puss in Boot's profile can we get rid of the **** site link in his speed section
not sure, but when you click on it, you do not see puss in boots.Gfycat? Is it not allowed here?
Yes... There's **** adds in that site, I'll get rid of it.not sure, but when you click on it, you do not see puss in boots.
Done.Request for moving Mayday to Mayday (No Straight Roads) because Mayday is likely a common name.
I also handled the redirect links.Done.
Done.Please do the redirect code thing so when people look up "Clodsire", they end up as Quagsire's page.
In response to this thread: https://vsbattles.com/threads/error-on-tightens-profile.149457/
Tighten does have 2 matches against Homelander listed on his page, winning and losing. However, I’m not knowledgeable enough on the match up to know which is more valid than the other.
@ElixirBlueI am not involved with Vs Threads, but which one was more recent should be my first question? And perhaps link the two individual Vs threads for faster access?
After AKM, DontTalk, and myself requested it, our forum system manager has changed so the report button for forum posts automatically leads to our rule-violation reports thread. The lag was likely caused by the forum updates.What's happening with the lag mate?
New feature looks good.After AKM, DontTalk, and myself requested it, our forum system manager has changed so the report button for forum posts automatically leads to our rule-violation reports thread. The lag was likely caused by the forum updates.
It works quite wellAfter AKM, DontTalk, and myself requested it, our forum system manager has changed so the report button for forum posts automatically leads to our rule-violation reports thread. The lag was likely caused by the forum updates.
New feature looks good.
Thank you. That is good then.It works quite well
Yeah it’s working much better now.Thank you. That is good then.
Also, can somebody please inform us of all the remaining tasks to be handled in this thread since I last visited some days ago please?
this match was seemingly an acidental stomp, it should be close
Only these 2Bump
Someone make @Dereck03 admin so that all of mine work and request can be fulfilled.
We are working on it, but since we promoted him to content moderator rather recently, we have had to wait for a while according to our rules. I hope that we will be able to promote him quite soon though.Someone make @Dereck03 admin so that all of mine work and request can be fulfilled.
We are working on it, but since we promoted him to content moderator rather recently, we have had to wait for a while according to our rules. I hope that we will be able to promote him quite soon though.
Honestly deserves it with how much he helps here.We are working on it, but since we promoted him to content moderator rather recently, we have had to wait for a while according to our rules. I hope that we will be able to promote him quite soon though.
The argument had been going in circles for several days -- as per the norm with your CRTs -- and was discussed to the satisfaction of multiple admins.1: The opposition presented arguments we were not given a chance to counter
This was addressed in the thread. The only Doctor Fate profile we have on the wiki is Classic Doctor Fate. If you want to propose the creation of an entirely new Doctor Fate profile with new ratings, that will require its own thread.2: The discussion of the thread was not done, the discussion of whether Nabu was Low 1-C was still to be had. The thread was closed before the discussion could take place
The rule is 3 staff for acceptance, not rejection. All that the accepted claims addressed were intelligence ratings.3: The opposition's arguments were blindly believed by a single admin, who closed it under his own terms, when this thread is a controversial one dealing with Tier 2 and 1 requiring at least 3 admins
Both Firestorm and Antvasima agreed with the scans used.4: The scans presented were not verified and were assumed to match the claims of the opposition
Only two admins gave input, and it wasn't going in circles for several days, it was inactive since Firestorm was familiarizing himself with the thread.The argument had been going in circles for several days -- as per the norm with your CRTs -- and was discussed to the satisfaction of multiple admins.
It is Classic Dr. Fate but Nabu himself is a singular entity existing across the Multiverse(unlike Kent Nelson/Dr. Fate). There's only a single Nabu, and that holds true for both classic and current. I don't think we need a new profile, just the existing one to be updated allowing Nabu's new feats.This was addressed in the thread. The only Doctor Fate profile we have on the wiki is Classic Doctor Fate. If you want to propose the creation of an entirely new Doctor Fate profile with new ratings, that will require its own thread.
Why wouldn't the rule apply for rejections? If it takes 3 staff for acceptance it's safe to say it will also take 3 for rejections.The rule is 3 staff for acceptance, not rejection.
I was specifically referring to the Dr. Fate ones, which Firestorm did not agree with. And either way, we were not given a chance to counter.Both Firestorm and Antvasima agreed with the scans used.
Then that would require a CRT unto itself, because Classic Fate's profile explicitly states not to do this.It is Classic Dr. Fate but Nabu himself is a singular entity existing across the Multiverse(unlike Kent Nelson/Dr. Fate). There's only a single Nabu, and that holds true for both classic and current. I don't think we need a new profile, just the existing one to be updated allowing Nabu's new feats.
It does not say that it does. If you think it should, you can argue for that elsewhere.Why wouldn't the rule apply for rejections?
The evidence was very definitive. The thread should stay closed, all the pertinent topics reached their conclusions.And either way, we were not given a chance to counter.
Why can't my CRT be used to do that?Then that would require a CRT unto itself, because Classic Fate's profile explicitly states not to do this.
I will ask some staff for clarifications.It does not say that it does. If you think it should, you can argue for that elsewhere.
You think the evidence was very definitive, I don't, especially since they don't even address our arguments. CRTs aren't locked based on if the opposition thinks their evidence is definitive.The evidence was very definitive. The thread should stay closed, all the pertinent topics reached their conclusions.
You can make a new one. That's not what that one was about in the first place.Why can't my CRT be used to do that?
You're right. They're locked based on if the staff thinks it's definitive, and they did.CRTs aren't locked based on if the opposition thinks their evidence is definitive.
This thread wasn't originally about that but it still holds some relevancy as Nabu's tier was part of the original proposal. I see no reason why the discussion cannot happen there.You can make a new one. That's not what that one was about in the first place.
Only @Antvasima did, certainly not a "they"(plural).You're right. They're locked based on if the staff thinks it's definitive, and they did.
EDIT: Adding to this, I will say that my feat about BWL trying to destroy the Multiverse by messing with the frequency and some of the Batman feats I provided were also ignored.