Because the thread was rejected by staff and reached a conclusion that staff was satisfied with, and you're attempting to reopen it to both a) Perpetuate a settled discussion and b) try to bring up an entirely separate issue. Are we done here now?
Only @Antvasima was satisfied, who is a single admin and I was not given a chance to counter, along with many of my arguments being ignored. The thread isn't settled until-
I asked KLOL for some clarifications, and I was right- https://media.discordapp.net/attach...29-43-63_572064f74bd5f9fa804b05334aa4f912.jpg
I don't see the relevance in this, why I asked him does not change what he said, which is what's relevant. But I went and asked Ovens as well and he said this- https://media.discordapp.net/attach...38-35-09_572064f74bd5f9fa804b05334aa4f912.jpg
The point is that KLOL's thoughts on the matter aren't particularly important.
Did you link him to the thread and explain the full context or did you simply give a hypothetical that left out the relevant details?
Hypothetical, and I didn't leave out any important detail
Color me shocked.
vsbattles.fandom.com
I handled it.RWBY Chibi
RWBY Chibi is an American animated web series and spin-off of RWBY. RWBY Chibi features stylized "chibi" versions of RWBY characters, and focuses on lighthearted comedy rather than plot and drama. In terms of Attack Potency and Durability, RWBY Chibi characters are consistently Wall level. It is...
Can someone delete this verse page? It's been merged with the main RWBY verse page
I have done so.
Thank you
I gave him a link to this thread, so he might respond later, but I don't see the issue with a hypothetical here. Your argument about Dr. Fate was really only agreed by Antvasima alone, who himself didn't do much of a verification. Firestorm definitely could have responded after, what context exactly do you think I hid?
This is wrong. Deagonx presented new arguments which we were not given a chance to counter, Firestorm did not get a chance to evaluate his argument on Dr. Fate(and we didn't get a chance to counter), and the discussion on some Batman feats I presented was not done, along with many more.
Agreed. Particularly his constant leveraging of the "controversial revision" rule strikes me as bad faith, given that he is almost constantly making Tier 1 and Tier 2 threads and using it to demand further staff input when they are rebutted. And given that the two of them seem to always drag out a debate ad infinitum, the cost-of-entry for an outside staff member to get acquainted with the full discussion becomes too high to be feasible which makes the "three staff members" requirement unrealistic, which I believe is the goal.
The problem is, any discussion about any feat perpetuates never-endingly when they are involved. They never concede a single point no matter how thoroughly they're debunked. It only ever ends with staff intervention.
I have similar experiences in some of the threads that they have contributed to, yes.
They want to argue for a Low 1-C Doctor Fate, and I pointed out that this would require a new profile entirely since our only Doctor Fate profile is classic fate. They said they want that to be argued in the original thread even though it wasn't about that, so I don't see why they won't just start a new thread than try to string together several different topics.
1: Whether Jim Corrigan should have his "Superior to Nabu"
This is not true, I have conceded before multiple times, even to you(contrary to that, I don't remember you ever conceding in the wiki). And it's not up to you to decide if we were thoroughly debunked.
I think that Deagonx repeatedly countered that.
I think that we discussed that extensively as well.
Ditto.
Also ditto.
1 and 2 weren't covered. You presented some arguments yes, but we were not given a chance to counter, and for Dr. Fate, Antvasima assumed you were right about everything you said and no one else gave an evaluation. Firestorm previously, I will note, agreed with removing "Superior to Nabu".
Deagon presented some new scans which we were not given a chance to counter.
Refer above.
What? My arguments weren't discussed, they were ignored.
Well, his arguments seemed conclusive to me at the time at least.
There isn't much to discuss. Lex and regular Batman do not have sufficiently high feats to get straight supergenius statistics.
They were read, and disagreed with. Not every single statement you make needs to be quoted and responded to in order for it to be evaluated. The never-ending back and forth is not productive and rarely ever adds any new information that needs to be considered, it's just a circular repeating of opinions.
Exactly, just to you, and that too without seeing our counters. You assumed the opposition's argument was perfect and closed the thread.
Can you discuss the feats before coming to a conclusion?
And tbh, even if such evidence can be found, it would be more prudent to just start a new thread. That thread is titled "Trigon downgrade, and Nabu and TBWL Upgrade." There's no reason to use it as the primary venue for a Lex Luthor and Batman intelligence upgrade.
That is correct, yes. The Transcendings are not genuinely toxic as far as I have noticed, but they are so relentlessly stubborn and argumentative that they are very tiresome to deal with sometimes.
Okay. Never mind then.
