-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Actual YGO card game discussion thread: Firewall did nothing wrong
- 784
- 323
- 9,249
- 2,710
You haven't seen this yet.PaChi2 said:
- 20,721
- 3,668
- Thread starter
- #125
You haven't seen this yet.
That thing requires 4 lvl 5s or cheat it via 3 lvl 4s + rank up. It could have 5k and still it'd be bad lol
That thing requires 4 lvl 5s or cheat it via 3 lvl 4s + rank up. It could have 5k and still it'd be bad lol
- 784
- 323
True but I just posted it for memes lulPaChi2 said:
- 8,635
- 9,088
HA, heavy.Endless Astrograph Sorcerer said:
Because the card has heavy in name, genius
- 784
- 323
Oh lmao
- 20,721
- 3,668
- Thread starter
- #130
Recent update:
Im making a Super Danger! Quant deck. Tell me if you wanna try it.
This is ridiculous.
Im making a Super Danger! Quant deck. Tell me if you wanna try it.
This is ridiculous.
- 784
- 323
F
- 784
- 323
(and yes, he had something to respond to the alich... solemn judgment)
- 784
- 323
It'd be far more bonkers if Cherubini was in the extra deck lul
- 784
- 323
Pach, we should play OCG on DB sometime, the format is super fun
- 784
- 323
Also lmao I just won a duel where I accidentally chose the wrong deck
Luckily, it was an old OCG BA Noid build so I easily piloted it and OTK'd without issue. Would've been awkward if I had hit one of the decks I threw together and never played.
Luckily, it was an old OCG BA Noid build so I easily piloted it and OTK'd without issue. Would've been awkward if I had hit one of the decks I threw together and never played.
- 20,721
- 3,668
- Thread starter
- #138
- 784
- 323
Regionals tomorrow, I'm hype af
- 784
- 323
Also someone posted this in Zodiac and I love it. Shoulda called it Grass "C" tho
- 784
- 323
OvO
- 784
- 323
At least it being a tuner kinda makes sense considering level, type, and attribute. Why in gods name is it a union monster lmao?
- 784
- 323
Shoulda been a level 3 Dark Fiend tbh to be honest :^)
- 784
- 323
Ban Isolde, free Malicious
- 784
- 323
Actually don't ban Isolde, I've been thinking about this recently.. I'm usually not a fan of the concept of nerfing cards via errata but I think it might be a good idea for some of the more broken VRAINS Pack 1 cards especially since the direction Konami seems to be moving toward with card design falls in line with what I'm about to suggest.
Isolde should require at least one "Noble Knight" monster and/or be restricted to sending "Noble Arms" equip spells.
Crystron Needlefiber's summoning conditions are fine but it should be restricted to summoning "Crystron" tuners.
Cherubini is less problematic than the other two but it probably should be restricted to only sending level 3 Dark monsters if not just limited to sending "Burning Abyss" monsters outright.
In general it's probably best to try to keep broken link monsters well..broken but either archetype lock them or lessen their impact to the point where it's more reasonable.
Isolde should require at least one "Noble Knight" monster and/or be restricted to sending "Noble Arms" equip spells.
Crystron Needlefiber's summoning conditions are fine but it should be restricted to summoning "Crystron" tuners.
Cherubini is less problematic than the other two but it probably should be restricted to only sending level 3 Dark monsters if not just limited to sending "Burning Abyss" monsters outright.
In general it's probably best to try to keep broken link monsters well..broken but either archetype lock them or lessen their impact to the point where it's more reasonable.
- 784
- 323
Eh, I know this is controversial but I have no inherent problem with link climbing.
- 20,721
- 3,668
- Thread starter
- #152
My only issue with link climbing is when the links themselves can make a L4nk out of GUB.Endless Astrograph Sorcerer said:
1) Summon bulb
2) LS Linkuriboh.
3) SS from GY
4) Needlefiber ---> SS junk
5) LS Summon Sorceress.
6) SS the tuna from GY.
7) SS something from deck with Summon Sorceress.
8) Make a L4nk or synchro summon or something.
ISNT THIS A BIT TOO MUCH? Im okay if you can plus off your links, but plussing then climbing into another plusser then make your boss out of a single monster is ridiculous.
- 13,565
- 5,728
When it has 8 steps to it, I am reminded of Zoos. So yes, that is a bit much.
- 784
- 323
Zoo format(s) was great. I don't think there's anything particularly noteworthy about there being eight steps.
>ISNT THIS A BIT TOO MUCH?
Well, yeah but this is kind of a "Summon Sorc needs to get the axe" thing.
>ISNT THIS A BIT TOO MUCH?
Well, yeah but this is kind of a "Summon Sorc needs to get the axe" thing.
- 784
- 323
Seriously, having L2NKs as powerful starters makes sense. Summon Sorc is just complete BS.
- 784
- 323
I'm on the registration line rn but I almost missed the event, it starts at 10 and I woke up at 9 and hadda shower and write my decklist. Good thing I'm staying in the hotel where tis being held
- 1,167
- 57
Guess who is back.
- 1,167
- 57
You know, me. That guy that agreed with Rapid on a lot of stuff back then, like 3-A DSOD and a lot of stuff that should make Yugi and other duelists Hax beasts.
