DenLitz
He/Him- 309
- 143
Summary
In this thread, I would like to ask for justification of Staff size in Naruto dodged Light Fang calculations.
Problem
Conclusion
Based on what I said above, I conclude that the value of the Staff size used is 0.0214m or 2.14cm (is it that small?), but the blog doesn't show where the 0.0214m value comes from. That's confusing, I hope Calcer put some proof on where the 0.0214m value is coming from(either from Pixel Scale, or maybe Databook?).
Note : Considering the Calculation accepted by CGM, It shouldn't be difficult to put proof of where the Staff size value comes from on the Blog, I (and maybe others who think like me) need justification for proof of where the value comes from, so that the calculation is truly accurate & legit and does not confuse other members who see the calculations.
In this thread, I would like to ask for justification of Staff size in Naruto dodged Light Fang calculations.
Problem
| Step 1 Staff: 64.25px = 0.0214m Beam: 290.37px = 0.09671467704m Step 2 Face: 290px = 0.214m Staff: 64.25px = 0.04882694663m Screen: 518px |
- Why does the Staff in steps 1 & 2 have the same Pixel values, but have different Meter values?
- Where do these two values come from? from the pixel scale? The first step suddenly displays staff size = 2.14 Cm(that small, really?), without including where the value came from.
| Staff and Screen 2atan(tan(35deg) * [64.25/518] = 9.9273739784 degree Distance: 0.1232m |
- When measuring the distance between the staff and the screen, it is not told which Staff size value (step 1 or 2) is used. But after I tried to enter these two values into the Angular Size calculator, the Staff size value was 0.0124m which gave the result 0.1232m.
Conclusion
Based on what I said above, I conclude that the value of the Staff size used is 0.0214m or 2.14cm (is it that small?), but the blog doesn't show where the 0.0214m value comes from. That's confusing, I hope Calcer put some proof on where the 0.0214m value is coming from(either from Pixel Scale, or maybe Databook?).
Note : Considering the Calculation accepted by CGM, It shouldn't be difficult to put proof of where the Staff size value comes from on the Blog, I (and maybe others who think like me) need justification for proof of where the value comes from, so that the calculation is truly accurate & legit and does not confuse other members who see the calculations.
