Tdjwo
He/Him- 2,944
- 1,165
Cant wait for M3X to humble a fodder once he finishes his batman catalogs.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
About Naruto dodged Light Fang Calc(FTL 2.11 C)
- Thread starter Mussdit
- Start date
-
- Tags
- ftl naruto versenaruto
- Status
- 14,189
- 11,188
Next person who mentions one piece, M3X or shows blatant unjustified bias is getting reported for derailment and inciting flame war shit
- 82
- 22
- Thread starter
- #83
Can't wait? If he can answer this thread he should have answered since the 2022 thread was made
- 14,189
- 11,188
And reported.
- 82
- 22
- Thread starter
- #85
Agree, I will be patient for longer, if he doesn't come in the next 1 week I will come back here.
- 11,280
- 17,540
Whoever suggested the calc be removed is making a horrible suggestion, as not a single Calc Group Member has approved the removal of the calc, and thus you can't just go and make such an executive decision.
- 82
- 22
- Thread starter
- #87
But can you explain my question in this thread?
- 11,280
- 17,540
I don't do Naruto stuff, sorry
- 82
- 22
- Thread starter
- #89
Can I ask you a question? Who is the CGM that handles naruto
- 10,338
- 9,063
Check who evaluated and accepted the current calc and message them on their walls
- 11,280
- 17,540
I agree with Nierre here. You should look at who accepted the calc and ask them to check out this thread on their message walls.
- 11,280
- 17,540
Anyways with that being said, I'mma unwatch the thread, so have fun
- 82
- 22
- Thread starter
- #93
Hello KLOL, you seem to have evaluated this calc, could you explain my question? Sorry, I know you don't handle HST, but considering you are one of the cgm who received this calc, I ask you to explain.
- 32,776
- 37,946
Explain what, exactly?
- 9,854
- 3,645
Why u accepted the calc or smth
- 82
- 22
- Thread starter
- #96
1) Why does the Staff in steps 1 & 2 have the same Pixel values, but have different Meter values?
2) Where do these two values come from? from the pixel scale? The first step suddenly displays staff size = 2.14 Cm(that small, really?), without including where the value came from.
DenLitz
He/Him- 309
- 143
My Opinion :
1) Possibility of the value in the first step 0.0214 m is a Typo from Naruto's face, which is 0.214 m, so similar it's just a typo maybe by entering one more value 0, and also a 2 cm wide staff doesn't make sense it's too small.
The correct Staff value is 0.04882694663m, if you don't believe me just try with a consistent panel/image with Pixel Scale, I've checked this dozens of times.
2. Where does the value come from? again, it's likely from a Typo, or even Calcer doesn't know where the value came from.
=================================
2atan(tan(35deg) * [64.25/518] = 9.9273739784 degrees
Distance: 0.1232m
This is where the problem starts, the degree calculation is fine, but when entering into the Angular Size calculator, M3X use the value 0.0214m (wrong value), what if we enter the correct value (0.04882694663m) ? it will prove the panel as well as calculations with PoV is inconsisten, plug it into the Angular Size calculator and get 0.2811 m. But pay attention to the location of the inconsistency of this panel, the distance between the PoV and the staff (0.2811m) is farther than the distance between the PoV and Naruto's face (0.27295m), 0.2811m > 0.27295m, Calc with PoV method/PoV panel is inconsiten.
"But if 0.0214m is used it will be consistent", NO, the value is not even clear and if you pixel scale Staff accurately like my Calc, the result is unlikely to be 0.0214m it will be around 0.04882694663m.
This My Naruto dodge light fang Calc :
Naruto dodge Light Fang
vsbattles.fandom.com
Last edited:
- 82
- 22
- Thread starter
- #98
I agree, the frame used falls into the unquantifiable frame.My Opinion :
1) Possibility of the value in the first step 0.0214 m is a Typo from Naruto's face, which is 0.214 m, so similar it's just a typo maybe by entering one more value 0, and also a 2 cm wide staff doesn't make sense it's too small.
The correct Staff value is 0.04882694663m, if you don't believe me just try with a consistent panel/image with Pixel Scale, I've checked this dozens of times.
2. Where does the value come from? again, it's likely from a Typo, or even Calcer doesn't know where the value came from.
=================================
2atan(tan(35deg) * [64.25/518] = 9.9273739784 degrees
Distance: 0.1232m
This is where the problem starts, the degree calculation is fine, but when entering into the Angular Size calculator, M3X use the value 0.0214m (wrong value), what if we enter the correct value (0.04882694663m) ? it will prove the panel as well as calculations with PoV is inconsisten, plug it into the Angular Size calculator and get 0.2811 m. But pay attention to the location of the inconsistency of this panel, the distance between the PoV and the staff (0.2811m) is farther than the distance between the PoV and Naruto's face (0.27295m), 0.2811m > 0.27295m, Calc with PoV method/PoV panel is inconsiten.
"But if 0.0214m is used it will be consistent", NO, the value is not even clear and if you pixel scale Staff accurately like my Calc, the result is unlikely to be 0.0214m it will be around 0.04882694663m.
This My Naruto dodge light fang Calc :
Naruto dodge Light Fang
There is not only one way to do the calculation, we can do it another way, like your calculation.
- 126
- 67
alright then, i'll just agree, nothing wrong in your calc though.
- 126
- 67
probs you need Damage3245 to evaluate or some, i guess he/she is a naruto supporter? he always follow some naruto update
- 126
- 67
what do you mean by defect? could you explain?
- 18,393
- 14,311
- 32,776
- 37,946
- 18,393
- 14,311
Thanks for cooperation :3
- 82
- 22
- Thread starter
- #105
The angsizing part why use 2.14cm KLOL?
- 32,776
- 37,946
No idea, that you'll have to ask M3X yourself.
I originally suggested better values that'd get better speed values using the same scenes he used without too much fiddling with Pythagoras but eh. I don't care enough about Naruto to give a ****.
- 18,393
- 14,311
- 32,776
- 37,946
- 2,822
- 990
Is it a different calc than the one proposed as replacement in the thread? If so you could present it the more calcs the better right?
- 32,776
- 37,946
Nope, same calc, just a little bit of different pixel-scaling and not needing Pythagoras. The angle deviation isn't as extreme as I thought it'd be.
- 2,822
- 990
Isnt that basically a different calc? Or do you mean the value is the same?
I mean you say it has different steps and different math so this should count as a different calc right?
- 18,393
- 14,311
He said he used a different pixel scaling method, I assume. Not different steps.
- 32,776
- 37,946
Slight variation but yeah, same ballpark.
I wouldn't say so, it's the same feat. But I've no desire to do so. My abstinence to the HST should be made very clear at this point.
All I'll give hint to is to calculate the distance from the moment where the light beam hits the staff, and calculate Naruto's distance moved from the top of his head to the bottom right corner.
- 126
- 67
@Mussdit, Hey bro, about the userblog calculation that you had given from the thread. Is there any reason why you using the Naruto Body Height to measure the distance his head into the staff? you could use the Width of the staff though.
And better using the Manga version
On this one, you could just measure the width of the staff, and then pixel the distance naruto head into the staff.
And better using the Manga version
On this one, you could just measure the width of the staff, and then pixel the distance naruto head into the staff.
- 32,776
- 37,946
Because it is best to calculate the dodge the moment it happens. This distance would be terrible to measure the actual beam-to-Naruto distance when the Beam isn't there to begin with.@Mussdit, Hey bro, about the userblog calculation that you had given from the thread. Is there any reason why you using the Naruto Body Height to measure the distance his head into the staff? you could use the Width of the staff though.
And better using the Manga version
On this one, you could just measure the width of the staff, and then pixel the distance naruto head into the staff.
DenLitz
He/Him- 309
- 143
Use width of the staff not better.@Mussdit, Hey bro, about the userblog calculation that you had given from the thread. Is there any reason why you using the Naruto Body Height to measure the distance his head into the staff? you could use the Width of the staff though.
And better using the Manga version
On this one, you could just measure the width of the staff, and then pixel the distance naruto head into the staff.
Btw whose calculation do u mean? in this thread there are only my & M3X calculations right?
- 126
- 67
DenLitz
He/Him- 309
- 143
I will give a simple explanation, one of which is if you use Naruto's height you only need one step, whereas if you use a staff width it requires two steps, because you need to find the exact width of the staff with Naruto's height. The more steps (which are not as important, as the width of the staff) in the calculation allows Calc to be inaccurate.
- Status
