About Naruto dodged Light Fang Calc(FTL 2.11 C)

[Mussdit]

Discuss this calc : https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:M3X/Naruto:_Naruto_dodged_Light_Fang

Problem :


• Why does the Staff in steps 1 & 2 have the same Pixel values, but have different Meter values?

• Where do these two values come from? from the pixel scale? The first step suddenly displays staff size = 2.14 Cm(that small, really?), without including where the value came from.

• ( )
After I searched based on pixel scaling using your image I got 5.5539cm

Height naruto 166cm | 538px
Staff 18px | 5.5539cm


Problem:

• When measuring the distance between the staff and the screen, it is not told which Staff size value (step 1 or 2) is used. But after I tried to enter these two values into the Angular Size calculator, the Staff size value was 0,0214m which gave the result 0,1232m.
And when I did the angsize calculation using your pixel value by changing the size of the staff, I found the distance of the staff from the screen 0.31888m.
Naruto's face should be far from the screen, why is it the staff instead?

Conlusion :
Based on what I said above, I found some irregularities and hope you can explain what I said.

1. Using a staff size of 2.14cm without giving the source?
2. After I searched the size of the staff itself has a value of 5.5539cm and changing your angsize, it looks like the staff is farther from Naruto's face.

So, your calc has inconsistent panels and I suggest to use this calc which is accepted : https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:DenLitz/Naruto_dodge_Light_Fang

 

[Mussdit]

Can someone call M3X here?

 

[Fikriskps]

I never saw m3x in 1year

 

[EndlessPheonix750]

Agree, M3X didn't show his pixel scalling measurement how he get the pixel value to know Naruto's Body Height, Head, and others.

 

[EndlessPheonix750]

Can someone call M3X here?

you could ask antivisima some help in this Thread

 

[Greatsage13th]

agreed

 

[Halkum145]

I never saw m3x in 1year

I saw it was active yesterday. tagged in this thread, coming soon (probably)

 

[Mussdit]

you could ask antivisima some help in this Thread

I've done it, now let's wait.

 

[FlugelAlcor]

2.14 cm for the staff's diameter? Nah that's too small tho

 

[Jayy]

Agreed, i also noticed that this calc has a bunch of inconsistency in it. Which made the result kinda off.

 

[KLOL506]

@M3X_2.0 you have been summoned.

 

[M3X_2.0]

No I haven't, they just need to read the calc with attention.

 

[Tdjwo]

No I haven't, they just need to read the calc with attention.

Lol

 

[Mussdit]

No I haven't, they just need to read the calc with attention.

I ask you to explain, what are you waiting for again? I have looked carefully at your calculations.

 

[Ren1999]

Bump

 

[Mussdit]

No I haven't, they just need to read the calc with attention.

Why did you ignore me? I'm just asking, are you unable to answer my question? So the conclusion is that your calc has flaws?

 

[Fikriskps]

No I haven't, they just need to read the calc with attention.

:O

 

[Jayy]

No I haven't, they just need to read the calc with attention.

Emm no, there is definitely flaws in your Light Fang Calc. Actually, these flaws are only noticeable if you read the calc carefully

 

[Suigetsuhyugs]

I get it the 0.0214 is because he was using Naruto's head to calc the real value of the staff which later will give you the 0.048 that is the actual size of the staff width.

Also you are calcing Naruto's staff size in another frame so its very much likely it will give you a different value

 

[Mussdit]

I get it the 0.0214 is because he was using Naruto's head to calc the real value of the staff which later will give you the 0.048 that is the actual size of the staff width.

Also you are calcing Naruto's staff size in another frame so its very much likely it will give you a different value

Right, but in angsizing he uses 0.0214m not 0.04m, which means his calc has a flaw, right?

I used that frame because it has 1:1 pov, also after the incident in that frame he avoided the LF, is there a problem in that frame so I can't look for the staff size?

 

[Mussdit]

I get it the 0.0214 is because he was using Naruto's head to calc the real value of the staff which later will give you the 0.048 that is the actual size of the staff width.

Also you are calcing Naruto's staff size in another frame so its very much likely it will give you a different value

Also, 64.25×0,214÷290= 0.047412069m not 0.048m

 

[Suigetsuhyugs]

Also, 64.25×0,214÷290= 0.047412069m not 0.048m

He probably used more decimal cases and when i said 0.0488... was a simplefication. The difference between those numbers are small so it can easily be duo to the decimal cases used

 

[Suigetsuhyugs]

Right, but in angsizing he uses 0.0214m not 0.04m, which means his calc has a flaw, right?

Not sure.

I used that frame because it has 1:1 pov, also after the incident in that frame he avoided the LF, is there a problem in that frame so I can't look for the staff size?

The comments on the calc talk about that how Naruto and Madara could have changed their position from each frame sp they decided to use the last frame to calc because he didnt changed his position anymore

 

[Mussdit]

He probably used more decimal cases and when i said 0.0488... was a simplefication. The difference between those numbers are small so it can easily be duo to the decimal cases used

Still in angsizing he did not use the value of 0.0488m, he used the value of 0.0214m.

 

[Mussdit]

The comments on the calc talk about that how Naruto and Madara could have changed their position from each frame sp they decided to use the last frame to calc because he didnt changed his position anymore

You don't seem to understand, we use that frame because the staff looks full and we can find the size using naruto as a foundation, so what are you discussing? I don't understand.

 

[Mussdit]

Not sure.

Why aren't you sure? I have explained several points above, if you understand calc you should understand that calc m3x has flaws.

 

[Suigetsuhyugs]

You don't seem to understand, we use that panel because the staff looks full and we can find the size using naruto as a foundation, so what are you discussing? I don't understand.

This was taken from the comments of the original calc

 

[Mussdit]

This was taken from the comments of the original calc

See, I'm right, it seems you really don't understand, so it's useless for me to argue with you.

Lastly, I discussed finding the staff size, not the dodge distance used in the calc.

 

[Suigetsuhyugs]

See, I'm right, it seems you really don't understand, so it's useless for me to argue with you.

I understand im having an hard time understanding the pytagoras he used because the lines are not well identified.

Lastly, I discussed finding the staff size, not the dodge distance used in the calc.

They brought the same problem use 1 frame has less margin of error than using 2 of them so calcing the staff size in another fr4ame would give a certain error when compared to the next frame where NAruto's head would have a completely different size

 

[Mussdit]

I understand im having an hard time understanding the pytagoras he used because the lines are not well identified.

See, you're rambling unnecessarily because it has nothing to do with the thread at hand.

They brought the same problem use 1 frame has less margin of error than using 2 of them so calcing the staff size in another fr4ame would give a certain error when compared to the next frame where NAruto's head would have a completely different size

Once again, you are blabbering unnecessarily. Enough, stop the nonsense you're spouting.

Come on, you have to understand the topic first before you babble, nor the frame when naruto was already a hokage or still a kid if he carries a stick and looks full, it doesn't matter.

 

[Suigetsuhyugs]

See, you're rambling unnecessarily because it has nothing to do with the thread at hand.

Im trying to understand what he did understand his calc.

Once again, you are blabbering unnecessarily. Enough, stop the nonsense you're spouting.

Im not im answering to your question about using the size of the staff of another frame to which the comments on the calc talk about the reason he used it and why your view is wrong. You dont like it its your problem then.

 

[KLOL506]

See, this is why I don't engage in HST threads and I stick with hack-and-slash verses.

 

[Mussdit]

Im trying to understand what he did understand his calc.

You don't understand it at all.

Im not im answering to your question about using the size of the staff of another frame to which the comments on the calc talk about the reason he used it and why your view is wrong. You dont like it its your problem then.

This is indeed my problem because this is my thread, and has nothing to do with what you are discussing.

 

[EndlessPheonix750]

No I haven't, they just need to read the calc with attention.

attention of what?, there's literally flaws in your calc. Firstly you using pixel to measure the movement how many Naruto's move from his head to his waist, you just could use half of naruto's body and multiply it by 60 degree. There's a calc using your method and got 5.1c (FTL). But, with the frame you using in your calc, it will given a inconsistent result, there's another scene or frame that could be used safely and fine.

 

[ssgengar]

There's a calc using your method and got 5.1c (FTL). But, with the frame you using in your calc, it will given a inconsistent result, there's another scene or frame that could be used safely and fine.

So what’s wrong with that calc?

 

[Halkum145]

attention of what?, there's literally flaws in your calc. Firstly you using pixel to measure the movement how many Naruto's move from his head to his waist, you just could use half of naruto's body and multiply it by 60 degree. There's a calc using your method and got 5.1c (FTL). But, with the frame you using in your calc, it will given a inconsistent result, there's another scene or frame that could be used safely and fine.

is the calculation of DenLitz correct for you? If not, what is the correct calculation for you?

 

[Mussdit]

is the calculation of DenLitz correct for you? If not, what is the correct calculation for you?

Calculation Denlitz is fine

 

[Halkum145]

Calculation Denlitz is fine

phoenix used a lot of different formulas to calculate it so i was wondering lol

 

[Halkum145]

in any case, m3x or another cgm should take care of this crt, at least m3x should comment on it.

 

[Mussdit]

in any case, m3x or another cgm should take care of this crt, at least m3x should comment on it.

Idk, why is he ignoring this thread, is he incapable of answering it?