• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Ultima_Reality
Reaction score
16,523

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • Hello, sorry to bother you but could you please take a look at this thread

    Would this be BDE1 or BDE2, or anything at that?

    「ハハハ、それはね、ボクが全知全能なんかじゃないからさ。生まれた時は、ボクの意思だけがあった。その時は満たされていて、欠けたるものなど何一つなかった。完全無欠、〝全なる一〟──つまり、ボクしかいない世界だったんだ。そんなの、つまらないだろう?」 なるほどと、ギィは思った。 ギィだから、理解出来た。 つまりヴェルダナーヴァは、自らの意思で〝全知全能〟を捨てたのだ、と。
    I'm not at all omniscient or omnipotent, you know. When I was born, all that existed was my will. It was complete, fully, not a piece missing to it, I was the only one in the world, the “all-inclusive one”-that is, the only one in the world. Wouldn't that be boring?
    I see, Guy thought. Because it was Guy, he understood. In other words, Veldanava gave up “omniscience and omnipotence” of his own volition.

    Note : The character named Veldanava is not the same thing as this All-inclusive entity, they exist independently of each other but have a kind of a special connection
    If you have some time, could you comment here, please?
    Can you give some input here
    I have one very wierd question, would Brahman from Hinduism qualify for tier 0?
    Can you give your input here
    Hi, sorry to bother you again but this topic is something I need to wrap my head around for LotR.

    "Are there any 'bounds to a writer's job' except those imposed by his own finiteness? No bounds, but the laws of contradiction, I should think."

    This quote was used to describe the role of the Sub-Creator rather than the Creator I believe, as in Tolkien himself and other authors in the "Real World", this cosmologically puts the "Real World" as High 1-A+

    The "Real World" is viewed by Eru as fiction again, being that Eru is author of even "us" and that's wonderful support for Tier 0.

    However, the "Primary Reality" that the Ainur reside in is described as, at the very least, on par with the "Real World" in existence if not above it (depending on how literally the Timeless Halls are Eru's abode. It's the awkward situation of Seraphim around God's Throne sort of thing).

    The Ainur in their origin at the very least rival "authors" in terms of existence (with the Valar being granted titles as Sub-Creators in their own right, albeit in reference to their work in making the material world).

    So going back to my earlier rushed reactionary comment, would this result in the entire race (and the many existing sub-creators) being High 1-A+ in origin? Was it not only possible for only 1 character to be High 1-A+ per verse?

    Of course this is assuming that the transferring of the quote to Sub-Creators doesn't shake the quote's usability too much.
    Sorry to bother you, but I have a question: What is the Tier of the Inaccessible cardinals and Berkeley cardinals under the new system?
    Hello!
    Sorry for bothering, I know you are busy right now.
    But wanted to ask will there be QnA thread about the changes or we can just ask them here?
    since I have a lot of questions not just from myself, but many others that can't speak English hahaha kinda representing them
    Thanks
    Elyartaker
    Elyartaker
    oh I see thanks so I might bother you again haha sorry.



    First of all about quantity, can inaccessible amount of baseline outerversal reach high outerversal? or would it still be baseline outerversal since it is still the same quality?

    I was thinking to myself about EMR (extended model realism) and apophatic theology. Can these reach above low outerversal?
    I don't know about the former but the latter might have solid arguments for Tier 0.

    Well it's clear mathematical differences are low outerversal at best.
    so how about math differences in higher qualities? is it possible to have math on a higher quality? For example a character 7 layers into outerversal that scales to inaccessible cardinal on that level of quality (which should be superior to even Mahlo or absolute Infinity of someone 6 layers into outerversal)
    in short, higher quality of math ON that level of quality.
    or are these nonsense and can't be applied?

    we know BDE can reach baseline outerversal, so I assume we can have higher levels of BDE thus higher levels of quality yeah?

    other than BDE, what other hax or existence type can reach outerversal? NEP? also being above dimensionality should be baseline yeah? How about being above concept of dimensionality?

    Finally about nonduality and transduality and plurality or just overall duality since it's confusing for me, how high can it scale? Like can being above it be Tier 0? (this one from a nasuverse fan, mostly for ryougi shiki, asking if anyone or being can reach tier 0 in nasuverse)

    I'm so sorry for asking this much and it's okay if you decide to answer them later.
    Thanks
    Ultima_Reality
    Ultima_Reality
    First of all about quantity, can inaccessible amount of baseline outerversal reach high outerversal? or would it still be baseline outerversal since it is still the same quality?

    It would remain baseline, yeah.

    I was thinking to myself about EMR (extended model realism) and apophatic theology. Can these reach above low outerversal?
    I don't know about the former but the latter might have solid arguments for Tier 0.


    Extended Modal Realism is High 1-A+. Though if you take it fully seriously, it's probably not tierable. Not any more than, say, trivialism is.

    As for Apophatic Theology: It's already built into Tier 0, since Tier 0 by necessity entails being so transcendent that you are totally incommensurate with any concept or ontological feature whatsoever, insofar as those exist in a framework of differences, divisions, inequalities, etc. The end result of this is:

    1) Any language applied to it is, at best, analogical in nature. Since our intellection is used to apprehend things that are "such-and-such" and exist inside a system of divisions and differences and whatnot. It doesn't really translate fully when you move beyond this system and into a thing beyond divisions entirely.

    2) It can only be defined in terms of itself. There cannot be a numerical multitude of Tier 0s, and much less can there be something above a Tier 0. So, combined with the above (They're mutually causing in a sense, even), there's no prior, more fundamental thing which you can define a Tier 0 being in relation to. In that vein, it's like, the ultimate primitive notion, pretty much.

    So, yeah, it basically is a form of apophaticism. It just doesn't necessarily enter into the more radical forms of it, where you can't even refer to the thing at all, and every statement about it is an equivocation, and yada yada. Not every form of apophatic theology boils down to that. It's a linguistic method, first and foremost, and the actual concept that it was developed to make sense of is more important. Though usage of apophaticism, of course, generally points to said concept.

    so how about math differences in higher qualities? is it possible to have math on a higher quality? For example a character 7 layers into outerversal that scales to inaccessible cardinal on that level of quality (which should be superior to even Mahlo or absolute Infinity of someone 6 layers into outerversal)
    in short, higher quality of math ON that level of quality.


    Yeah, that can happen.

    we know BDE can reach baseline outerversal, so I assume we can have higher levels of BDE thus higher levels of quality yeah?

    Yeah.

    other than BDE, what other hax or existence type can reach outerversal? NEP?

    I suppose you can describe NEP in a way that nets you 1-A. But that goes for a lot of things, so, not exactly a very meaningful statement.

    also being above dimensionality should be baseline yeah? How about being above concept of dimensionality?

    Depends on how elaborate the statement is. Being described as "above dimensions" even in the correct sense can be Low 1-A, too.

    Finally about nonduality and transduality and plurality or just overall duality since it's confusing for me, how high can it scale? Like can being above it be Tier 0? (this one from a nasuverse fan, mostly for ryougi shiki, asking if anyone or being can reach tier 0 in nasuverse)

    The Root seems very much Tier 0 to me, for what's worth.

    As for the question: Transduality as we currently define it is honestly god-awful. I don't think the power is even inherently quantifiable going by the current treatment of it.
    Elyartaker
    Elyartaker
    Thank you so much
    Hey Ultima, I've got something I want clarifying. How knowledgeable are you on Hilbert Spaces?
    Ultima_Reality
    Ultima_Reality
    Depends entirely on the content of the actual question. Shoot.
    Everything12
    Everything12
    So am I wrong in thinking that the "infinite dimensions" of Hilbert Space are not Tierable dimensions but instead more properties an objects possesses; including things like velocity, spin, etc. With Hilbert Space not actually being a theoretical physical space but instead a purely mathematical concept, as usable in cosmology scaling as a graph on a piece of paper.

    Speaking of course entirely based on the real life theory and not any additional spin that depends on a specific writers interpretations.
    Ultima_Reality
    Ultima_Reality
    I mean, generally speaking, infinite-dimensional hilbert spaces are going to be just mathematical models. They're really just convenient tools to do algebra with; so, in quantum mechanics you'll always see a system of x-many possible states being modelled as a space of x-many dimensions, each state of it corresponding to a vector in that space.

    But they can be actual things, too. I think Max Tegmark, for example, has described a Type III Multiverse as being one where timelines indeed are embedded inside an actual infinite-dimensional space. Those cases are where my knowledge of the topic mostly ceases, though.
    Ultima can you give input on this?


    And

    Need your input here please

    Hello, Ultima. I have a question regarding this post of yours, which was used to counter a comment of mine

    Da question : If there are different Space-time continuums with different flows of time and unsynchronized time axes, and than there's a Space those 4D space-times [that is not insignificant], that Space itself would be 4D, than if lets say that 4D space is the spatiality of a higher space-time that contains the prior mentioned Space-times, with the higher space-time having its own Time axis, would that higher space-time be 5D, or still 4D?

    Regards.
    Salve Ultima, eu sou aquele rigelbr7 do servidor da dbw. Por quê tem me bloqueou? Poderia me responder só umas duas dúvidas que tenho?
    Hello Ultima, do you think Uatu High 1-A is justified? although the word multiverse can be used for Low 1-A universe, There's still an arguments can be made which I can present, Hope you can help.
    If you have some time, could you take a look?
    I read the sandbox for the new tiering system and read High 1-A+ is "on the scale of the highest forms of Modal realism and Type IV Multiverses, corresponding to the space of all logically possible worlds ("Logical space")."

    But what about EMR? Which is an extended version of MR that includes all logically possible worlds, as well as all impossible worlds, and High 1-A+ only ever mentions logical worlds; not illogical ones.

    Is EMR "above" High 1-A+ then, if it is "greater" than MR?
    • Like
    Reactions: Churchill
    Ultima_Reality
    Ultima_Reality
    Extended Modal Realism is pretty problematic because it's basically just fancy trivialism in its acceptance of all contradictory things as corresponding to "valid" states-of-affairs. I wouldn't tier it at all, myself, at least not in its full glory. If you water it down a bit it's probably just also High 1-A+, though.
    Furudo_Erika
    Furudo_Erika
    So, would it be an "Unknown" tier?
    Or High 1-A+?

    Or "At least High 1-A+"? As even watered down, EMR should still "embed" MR (possible worlds) in it, alongside the impossible worlds.
    Your answer will be appreciated

    Hello sir, I heard you are interested in Rick and Morty.

    Would you look at these


    Hi. Could you rate the Harry Potter updates that are listed? Thanks

    Hey Ultima, could you check out this CRT?
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Back
Top