New profile posts

Hello! if u interested

Here's a couple of threads I'd like your input in, please. Thanks!

Here's a couple of threads I'd like your input in, please. Thanks!

Hey, could you give your input on this CRT?

Hey, hey, it's me here. I got this userblog speed calc for dodging a electrical attack with a few ends. An Electricity Speed End (for a low-end), a Lighting Speed End (since it fulfills the requirements of lightning speed and is currently accepted as such for the verse), and a... SoL end due to the electrical attack having several SoL statements behind it (which is also consistently said and hasn't been retconned away but isn't currently accepted for the verse for now).

... before you ask. This is a LN verse with canon manga stuff hence why this absurd speed for a electrical attack is being thrown around.

This will be important for a future CRT of mine to debate if the use of the SoL statements should be used or not. So I am trying to have at least two of the ends accepted - The SoL ends if the use of the SoL statements is accepted or the Electricity/Lighting one if the use of the SoL statements are denied.

Hey Rusty, I wanted to ask if this beam Qualifies as LS. Well, the user of beam did call it light and is a light user himself. It doesn't contradicts standard and pretty much follows it. But I've not dealt with light speed standards so I think I can see some opinion on it.

Hi. Do you mind evaluating this calculation blog when you have time? It contains some simple Lifting Strength calculations.

Hi, could you invite me to the discord server you talked about ? (mori.gfx)

Hello, hello. If you have the time, could you please check this Calc Group thread and give your input on which which of the calculations should be used

Hello, hello. If you have the time, could you please check this Calc Group thread and give your input on which which of the calculations should be used

Hey, hey, fanta here. I got this extremely short LS calc. Can you check it out, Psycho, if you've the time?

I am currently dying. As such I invoke my Dead Man's Rights to not look at your CRTs. sorry, them's the rules.

Hey, I hope you're safe. Would you close this thread, please?

Hello friend, Can you give me your input here please?

Hello friend, Can i have your input here please?

Can you also give this one a look when you have time please?

Hello friend, Can you give me your input here when you have time?

Hello friend, Can you give me your input here when you have the time?

Hello friend, Can you give me your input here when you have time?

Hello friend, Can you give me your input here when you have the time?

Hello friend, Can you give this thread a look when you have time?

Hello friend, Can you give this calc a look please?

Hey, Damage. Could I get your input in this? SSB's multiplier is currently 10x, but Griffin suggested I did a thread to solve the issue before moving forward with the speed scaling

Hi Qawsedf, Is Tier 4 valid now that I proved the GW follows a UES (most people agree and we only need an admin approval rn)

Hello! if u interested

Hey Rusty can u checkout this LS calc?

Hello! if u interested

Can u check out this short calc?

Hi, if you have time can you evaluate this thread? it's about adding a profile, thanks in advance

Hey there! Can you check out this simple angsizing and perception speed calc?
I'd also appreciate it if you can also check this, an even simpler destruction calc.

Hey there Psycho, would you be willing to check out this calc? It involves simple angsizing and perception speed.

Sorry for the inconvenience, but if possible, could you check this crt? Thank you very much.

Hi, if you have time could you evaluate this? I would really appreciate

heya, could you potentially look at these two calculations real quick?

Could you take a look?

Could you take a look?

Care to give your opinion here?

Hey. Do you mind evaluating this calculation when you have time?

Do you have a discord address where I can talk to you?

Hi. Do you mind evaluating this CRT when you have time? It's fully accepted by two staff members other than one thing which has 1 approval and 1 neutral stance.