• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

New profile posts

KingTempest
KingTempest
I have a biased position towards Delta scaling, which is Delta scales relative to that Naruto, something I don't want to poison your thread with since I don't feel like arguing it.

I can call some more staff to it tho. Sorry bout that.
  • Like
Reactions: TFO
TFO
TFO
No problems, I understand. And yes, that would be much appreciated!
Excuse me for bothering you could you give me your opinion here please.
Fwyzzverse
Fwyzzverse
You must be very busy, so take the time you can, but in case the ping hasn't reached you, I'll send this message, compared to the previous one for my thread. 🤗
Thank you for opening those 2 profiles.
Could you also open this page too if possible please?
Dereck03
Dereck03
:quieto:

Got anyone for this?
Armorchompy
RandomGuy2345
RandomGuy2345
No High 8-Cs, 8-As, 7-Cs, or even 7-As?
Armorchompy
Armorchompy
i mean, i got my verses' AP ranges listed on my wiki page as always, i just don't have anyone who immediately springs to mind to me as matching up well
Hey, I wanted to ask, leaving all weirdness and inconsistent showings aside, where would you place DMC in terms of tier?
  • Like
Reactions: Serlock_Holmes
Serlock_Holmes
Serlock_Holmes
In the multiversal scale where it is now I think is a fitting tier for it except if new feats arise that would bump it higher.
Random-Helper323
Random-Helper323
Okay, that's fine. I already told Fujiwara that 2-C is fine by me, it's all the people who argue for much lower that are a problem.
Can we get your input on this major CRT, especially regarding concepts and voids?
You may not be a content or thread moderator nor an administrator but your views on this CRT is still appreciated.

Baw, could ya evaluate this?


Baw, could ya evaluate this?

Baw, could ya evaluate this?

Baw, could ya evaluate this?

Baw, could ya evaluate this?

Baw, could ya evaluate this?
Yo ultima, (Ik you arent really advocating for a change but still keeping op title as this because i mean what did you think would happen)

So overall I think all points made are great, however an issue that I am having is where you would rank further hierarchical dimensions as weve currently defined them

So from what ive seen, it seems you are proposing a tier below 11c to account for qualitatively inferior layers, and that 1A and above would change from talk of higher infinity dimensions to qualitatively superior layers, and that all higher infinity dimensions would be a sort of "high 1b+.

However i dont think that what effectively acts as all of low 1a, 1a, high 1a, and 0 currently to be shoved into high 1b+. What i think should happen is these sorts of higher levels of infinities with regards to dimensions and such, like inaccessible as described with high 1a (and basically the whole range of either high 1b through 0 or low 1a through 0) to be its own tier.

I think that this topic has been delved into quite heavily in many fictional verses as we see with the many characters in this tiering range (even though many characters should be in different spots due to the issues you mentioned in your post. Not all of them change).

So i basically think there should be 14 tier ranges instead of the 12 now. A range below 11 as you said, all of the current ones, transfinite dimensional tier range (which is what the current low 1a to 0 is), and then the qualitatively superior range above this that you refer to in your post. Then 0 of course. Or maybe not its own entire section but you get the gist

Thoughts on this?
Nierre
Nierre
Instead of asking on his wall, you can ask here. People are talking about his thread there, and he occasionally responds to what people have to say on that thread.
If you don't mind, can you check these?
🙏
🙏
Back
Top