• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

New profile posts

hello can you share your thoughts here?
Will you be able to provide some input in this thread? Also, can you ping the following staff members as well: DT, Ultima, Elizhaa, Executor_N0, Everything12, Planck69, Glassman as they are listed as knowledgeable on Tier 2 and 1 stuff.
Could i ask you to debunk something?
Qawsedf234
Qawsedf234
You can show me something and I can give my opinion on it, but I'm not going to participate in a debate.
I see you have already worked on the Body Control page. It was something I was planning to tackle months ago and completely forgot. So thanks for handling it.
However, I have some minor nitpicks.
  • Can we use numbered list instead of bullet list for the types?
  • 'Advanced function control' looks wrong/weird. I think something like 'Control of advanced functions' looks better, imo.
  • You changed 'Control of the Body' to 'Control of anatomical features' but it seems like you have removed some of the description like "In addition, in some cases, it can be controlled even separated from the body parts, which gives ample opportunity for attack (or to recover from the destruction of the main body).". Now it seems to have complete overlap in terms of functionality to 'Advanced function control'
  • Also, I was thinking should we add a Note section where we recommend people to add a 'limited' prefix when the character doesn't display the full gamut of abilities expected of the type while only displaying some of the abilities and having some limitations for the body control type.
Sup bro
I had something to ask from ya.

About the wog on the silver sea's infinite layers size and the world's infinite size. It was a screenshot that is available at the cosmology of the blog, but the direct source link from where the author's comment was taken is not there. Do you, perhaps, have the source link of it ?
Hello! if you have time, can you please check this out?

Hello! if you have time, can you please check this out?

Can you give some input here
Could I get your input on this CRT?
Could I get your input on this CRT?
Hello, could I get your input on this CRT?

Would using one of these things at all be a fair match against first key Dio?
Chariot190
Chariot190
idk, dio kinda outdated, ive just been busy LS and just a few hax mainly all that he's missing that's relevant but still
but it's warhammer so gonna say nah
Can you give some input here
Mr. Bambu
Mr. Bambu
Ionization is a weird method, looking back on it, I dunno if I'd still stand by those calcs. Still, I support the initiative, as I still very much adore XCOM. I seem to recall animations of soldiers dodging projectiles somewhat, although those animations of missed shots have always been very dodgy and odd. I can't think of anything in particular for LS off the top of my head, unfortunately.
Tomfer
Tomfer
I'm using your (old ass) suggestions as a base, hence why I'm still using ionization.

Speed-wise... Yeah, they don't really look like dodging and more of the opponent's fault for missing them, but still... I guess it can still be used? If nothing else comes. LS-wise, yeah, I guess I'll just put them as Athletic Humans since they're soldiers.

On another note, I've seen a very old CRT where you offered to put Sectoid's scaling as "possible" because Soldiers, while they can tank it, they do it barely. How about downscaling instead? It sounds more pausible since they can indeed tank it, it's not really open to possibilities.
Mr. Bambu
Mr. Bambu
Meh, I just can't personally remember what led to that conclusion- discussions that I don't think I have a presence in any more, I don't recall any lore that would have made that cool. They're still evaluated, but I think it would be better to just go with destruction/superheating, tbh.

That last point sounds fine to me. Six years of experience has changed how I view a lot of things, and our standards have also changed significantly since then.
I'm over my salt and am prepared to begin work on Hunter: the Parenting profiles

Now, are the feats present in the series itself good enough for proper ratings on most of the stats or do I need references from other WoD content in of itself?

Like, I know I'll need to pull from other content for Speed, I have no idea where Peak Human comes from for that, but are there any other stats I should be worrying about on that end?
hello Dereck, it's been a while, can you check this crt? just 2 stuff

Shiraito983
Shiraito983
hello, im here again. Can you share your thoughts on this?
This is already calced, but I want your honest opinion on this feat as the recalc out it at Low 7C. We have a brief moment for the destruction in question and it seems to been fragmentation at least.

Edit: I forget I can clip on YouTube.

Here is a short clip of this scene

HammerStrikes219
HammerStrikes219
To add a little more context to this, we see a spell launched at a side of a mountain and it technically did blow up a chunk of a mountain.
Chariot190
Chariot190
I can see that, just calc the destruction it caused?
HammerStrikes219
HammerStrikes219
Alright, I guess that is all I got there so yeah.
Hello! if you have time, can you please check this out?

Could you help me with this please?
Could you help me with this please?

Could you help me with this please?
Back
Top