Why do we take Murata '''statements''' seriously if he literally said that its just his opinions?

[Emirp sumitpo]

Also, Orochi's feat far surpasses Psykorochi, yet he's still weaker than she is.

But that's already getting off topic, if you wanna downgrade Boros, make your own thread, this thread is about the validity of Murata statements.

 

[Rez]

his ideal ending

What would that be?

 

[Emirp sumitpo]

What's would that be?

Basically, Saitama beats GOD, Saitama is only strong because of GOD, the universe sorta results and everything is the same except Saitama is now fodder iirc. Which is... What.

 

[XSOULOFCINDERX]

Basically, Saitama beats GOD, Saitama is only strong because of GOD, the universe sorta results and everything is the same except Saitama is now fodder iirc. Which is... What.

**** that shit.

 

[Kachon123]

No? Why are people bringing that up

Because FTL saitama is gone now.

 

[TheLastStylebender]

Context: The tweet was made when people thought ONE was the one telling Murata to redraw the chapters but ONE clarified that it was Murata who chose to do it.

Thank you for bring this

 

[Schnee_One]

I don’t know why we take Murata’s statements seriously when we had to remove one of them a while back. (Tatsumaki scaling to Mob)

 

[LordTracer]

I don’t know why we take Murata’s statements seriously when we had to remove one of them a while back. (Tatsumaki scaling to Mob)

That was ONE’s statement, not Murata’s.

 

[Emirp sumitpo]

ONE'S statement was removed because it was outdated

 

[Schnee_One]

Oh got them confused oops

 

[Qawsedf234]

Murata does stuff, it's just that ONE has the ultimate say about everything and can reject stuff he doesn't like. Murata in art an artbook released around the time of volume 7 or 10 said ONE had rejected enough to fill three extra volumes.

In the end while Murata doesn't have final say, ignoring him completely probably isn't the right way to go since he does do a decent swath of stuff. Especially when he was rather consistent in the streams about something being his opinion or coming from ONE.

The current possibly ratings come from a previous CRT about roughly the same topic, that it's possibly true so it being noted isn't outlandish.

 

[Emirp sumitpo]

Bump?

 

[MarvelFanatic119]

I just find it funny that ONE's statements here were removed due to being outdated while Murata's stayed due to them being overall more consistent.

But anyway I agree we keep Murata's statements, with any stats affected by them having Possibly to be safe and we can just remove them if they're outdated or become inconsistent.

 

[Emirp sumitpo]

Majority of the staff agrees to keeping our current stats so there's that?

 

[Armorchompy]

I'm fine either way.

 

[Kachon123]

bump

 

[TheLastStylebender]

Close this thread

 

[Emirp sumitpo]

Close this thread

no

 

[DaReaperMan]

no

yes

 

[GreatIskandar14045]

yesn't

 

[Emirp sumitpo]

I mean at least let the opposing side say one last chance, but if they don't, this can be closed

 

[Dhoryx]

Well it notified for nothing, but somehow I still watched this

 

[Kachon123]

bump

 

[Emirp sumitpo]

If there's no further reply for this, this can probably be closed

 

[TheLastStylebender]

@Antvasima

 

[Emirp sumitpo]

Only staff can't @

 

[Kachon123]

bump?

 

[Emirp sumitpo]

This can just be closed as it's pretty much dead and rejected

 

[Bernkastelll]

This can just be closed as it's pretty much dead and rejected

it wasnt rejected, it was choosed to be case by case, things like almost FTL geryuganshoop falls under what?

 

[Emirp sumitpo]

Case by case is already how we do things bruh

 

[Kachon123]

Case by case is already how we do things bruh

^

 

[Bernkastelll]

Case by case is already how we do things bruh

No? We do the things with a ''possibly'' rating

 

[Emirp sumitpo]

No? We do the things with a ''possibly'' rating

No? Not all Murata statements are accepted, for instance, we don't consider Evil Eye as even possibly superior to Fubuki because that contradicts established scaling.

 

[Bernkastelll]

No? Not all Murata statements are accepted, for instance, we don't consider Evil Eye as even possibly superior to Fubuki because that contradicts established scaling.

What about Geryuganshoop case?

 

[Emirp sumitpo]

Nothing contradicts that? As long as it isn't contradicted, then it can be used as possibly

 

[Bernkastelll]

Nothing contradicts that? As long as it isn't contradicted, then it can be used as possibly

What is the evidence to Almost SoL Geryuganshoop? I didn't saw none

 

[azontr]

What is the evidence to Almost SoL Geryuganshoop? I didn't saw none

Murata made a statement, nothing contradicts it and it isn't inconsistent, so we can use the SoL statement, Bern.

 

[Bernkastelll]

Murata made a statement, nothing contradicts it and it isn't inconsistent, so we can use the SoL statement, Bern.

Murata is literally being headcanon, Murata himself said so, and there is no evidence to SoL Geryuganshoop, but if we are going with double standard, then cool

 

[Emirp sumitpo]

But we're already taking Murata's statement as possibly? What?

 

[azontr]

Murata is literally being headcanon, Murata himself said so, and there is no evidence to SoL Geryuganshoop, but if we are going with double standard, then cool

People have explained this as nicely as possible. Murata is part of the project, he isn't completely irrelevant. He can make statements as long as they don't contradict ONE's will or anything in the story, and we can use them.