- 12,304
- 11,259
Fixed.Tier 1 should only be for characters Zoro likes
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Fixed.Tier 1 should only be for characters Zoro likes
I fail to see how that's any different than the fix I proposed.Tier 1 should only be reserved for me.
In your proposal there are multiple tier 1's,in Shmooply's proposal there can only be 1.I fail to see how that's any different than the fix I proposed.
The rizz.I fail to see how that's any different than the fix I proposed.
The Shmooply-Verse, Blunt, the Shmooply-Verse.In your proposal there are multiple tier 1's,in Shmooply's proposal there can only be 1.
Idk about best written game ever but I agree that its an amazing game, love it.Hotline Miami is probably the best written game ever. It vastly surpasses Tlou, and it might above RDR2 too.
Fr, it's peakIdk about best written game ever but I agree that its an amazing game, love it.
As someone who hasn't played a lot of Sonic games, Mania was a 10/10 it deserves its reputation.Sonic Mania is overrated and mediocre. The only reason Mania is well recieved is because Sonic fans are slave to Nostalgia.
It is a well made game because most of the stages are based on older stages from Sonic 1 to 3&K.As someone who hasn't played a lot of Sonic games, Mania was a 10/10 it deserves its reputation.
Pretty much the best thing came out of Sonic's Dark Age fr.Already said this but Sonic Unleashed is a great sonic game and is one of the best 3d games
Why tho? What does he have where he excels at being a villain compared to, say Frieza or Cell?Raditz is the best antagonist of the entire franchise. Not just of Dragon Ball Z, the entire franchise.
So you dislike the concept even though like half of pixar's movies are "what if X were like actual people with personalities"Sorry but i don't agree in the slightest. Cars is a bad movie at it's very core, the entire concept of the movie is dumb and this is especially bad considering that Pixar is known for making movies with clever concepts, Toy Story and Inside Out being the best examples of this trend. Cars is also one of the longest movies Pixar has ever made, being 117 minutes long. Add Lightning McQueen, an incredibly unbearable protagonist, to all of that and what you get is an incredibly unbearable movie.
After everything i've said, if you still want to watch Cars for it's "pleasant story and visuals", just watch Surf's Up. It's a movie that does everything Cars does, but better in every single way.
That's the point? He is an arrogant person taught to become a good person. You don't have to immediately love the MC in a movie bruv, that's never how it has been. If you require to be spoon-fed an immediately good protagonist for you to enjoy a story then idk what else to say, you do you.His character arc has to make sense first and McQueen's arc doesn't. He's not given any nice or enjoyable qualities during the first half of the movie to make me care about him changing by the end (change that is poorly done btw)
Oh so you just decided to drop the act and call out people personally ey? Here I thought you were arguing like a normal chap but instead you're one of those people on a high horse who thinks their opinion is objective lmao.People with bad taste enjoying bad movies.
This is kinda true. His design doesn't have a lot of the flaws the others have. He looks cooler than Pilaf, Tao, Commander Red, Tien, King Piccolo, etc. He has a more distinctive hairstyle than Vegeta, whose hair was kind of just made into the basic SSJ hair. While his is similar to SSJ3, that transformation is almost never used. He doesn't have Ginyu's weird pulsating head, or Frieza's weird bulgy muscles, or Cell's Semi-perfect form. Arguably, the only characters whose designs I prefer are the peak-design forms of later antagonists, and also Piccolo Jr, who is one of the aesthetically best villains in the series.Better design: While i love the more simplistic design of Frieza and Cell (Perfect Cell at least), there's something about Raditz's design that just does it for me. His long hair, his scouter, his armor, etc.
Personally, I like villains that are just hungy. But also, I completely agree.Better motivations: Most villains have three simple goals, they either want to conquer the world or the universe, they want immortality or they want to kill Goku. Raditz wanted something different, he wanted Goku to join him.
Objectively correct take btw.His relationship to the protagonist: Pretty straightforward, he's Goku's brother.
This is also true, sort of. However, a solid majority of original-series antagonists were defeated in strange and creative ways, or by Goku's friends helping him.The way he's defeated was unique and creative: Most villains in Dragon Ball are defeated in simple ways like being atomized with a Spirit Bomb or with a Kamehameha. The way Raditz was defeated was more violent and required a sacrifice from Goku no less. He also forced Goku and Piccolo to team up against him (they were archenemies before)
Let's be honest, Raditz staying around would have been great.He didn't overstay his welcome: Unlike Frieza who keeps coming back in Dragon Ball Super and becomes a bit tedious.
I don't know a single person who doesn't already do this.People should be determining what show they like more based on what show they enjoy watching more.
MasakoX reading this:He fulfilled his role in the story, i don't see where else they could go with his character.
Less than half, but ok.I never said the MC has to be a good person from the start but he does have to have at least some good qualities for me to care about him. McQueen is a self-absorbed asshole for most of the movie so don't judge me for thinking the movie is unbearable. This could be forgiven if his bad traits where at least funny or played for laughs, but that's not the case here.
Nah,he stops acting like an ass after spending all night paving the road.My point still stands.
Cause it ain't mid. It only looks mid in comparison to Pixar's catalogue which was made entirely out of 9/10's before Cars.I just find it kind of puzzling that you guys feel so strongly about a mid movie, like what's the deal.
No Cars 2 is shit.Only "mid" one is Cars 2, and i got mixed feelings on that.
If you like Mater it aint , if you find Mater annoying, it is .No Cars 2 is shit.
I found it that he started getting better after getting humiliated by Doc Hudson. After that, he calms down and starts doing a proper job, and starts being kinder to the other Springs residents.Nah,he stops acting like an ass after spending all night paving the road.
Mater is fine on his own, but a whole movie around him? His personality becomes annoying after that.If you like Mater it aint , if you find Mater annoying, it is .
Crazy how Pixar was throwing out banger after banger until Toy Story 3. After that they had some hiccups, some very big hiccups, but they're picking themselves up now. With the exception of Lightyear, every current decade Pixar movie ranges from good to excellent.Cause it ain't mid. It only looks mid in comparison to Pixar's catalogue which was made entirely out of 9/10's before Cars.Maybe except for A Bug's Life.
Got an issue with it?You got... mixed feelings on Cars 2.
That's the thing, if you find him annoying the movie is ass.Mater is fine on his own, but a whole movie around him? His personality becomes annoying after that.
Turning Red is mid af. Carried by people who have parental issues going "OMG so relatable". Aside from that you are spitting facts.Crazy how Pixar was throwing out banger after banger until Toy Story 3. After that they had some hiccups, some very big hiccups, but they're picking themselves up now. With the exception of Lightyear, every current decade Pixar movie ranges from good to excellent.
Enlighten me then.Several.
Well... that explains a lot.