- 15,027
- 12,719
Yeah pretty much.so basically, possilbly Higher means something that is Higher but can't be definied?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah pretty much.so basically, possilbly Higher means something that is Higher but can't be definied?
hm, seems kinda fine, i guess. so, do we have to wait for other inputs?Yeah pretty much.
Please ask comments unrelated to the thread on a user's message wall or in another thread.One question: If the set of multiverses (infinite number universes in each multiverse) are declared or used an analogy that is actually larger than single multiverse similar to finite objects instead of normal countable infinite sets as set of natural numbers and even numbers can this be possible for a higher tiers?
I ask because it related to this thread, specifically scp-4555, Metaverse (set of multiverses) exists in the article and is claimed to be larger than single multiverse using metaphorical analogies of solar systems and the larger galaxy contain them, implying that sets of multiverses are actually larger than single multiverse instead of equal, like sets of natural numbers compared to rational numbers, even numbers etc..Please ask comments unrelated to the thread on a user's message wall or in another thread.
I still don't see anything related to Metaverse, Chains of infinite multiversesWe have evaluated 4555's statement and provided our comments on it earlier in the thread.
This is because in the QA tiering system it says that the feat of destroying multiple infinite multiverses is no greater than destroying single infinite multiverse which subset of it because they are both Countable infinite and therefore equal, but if verse treats the feat as Larger is it really eligible for higher tiers?I don't know how stuff about a "metaverse" bumps it up.
Also, rating it at a "Church-Kleene Ordinal would be lower than what we currently put it at. So that'd be a downgrade if anything.
Is it gonna be the Acidverse statement that's been seen and responded to a thousand times already?Sadly I have to disagree with these updates, however I can provide direct evidence that Yesod Multiverse contains uncountable infinite dimensions and better, more valid descriptions about it.
Yes I know this well, but I have some fresh evidence on it. Of course if it were rejected I would go for other descriptions of Yesod Multiverse that might be helpfulIs it gonna be the Acidverse statement that's been seen and responded to a thousand times already?
So Why is Gan H1B? There are also other things like Wizard101, ...This is because in the QA tiering system it says that the feat of destroying multiple infinite multiverses is no greater than destroying single infinite multiverse which subset of it because they are both Countable infinite and therefore equal, but if verse treats the feat as Larger is it really eligible for higher tiers?
They're not eligible for higher tiers, they're just considered a higher part of 2-A.
1. Stop comparing different cosmologies as though they have the same context and expecting a change. That's never been how we do things here.So Why is Gan H1B? There are also other things like Wizard101, ...
I know that destroying 2 or more multiverse would be 2A but higher than Baseline. But destroying things like sets of infinite multiverses or more is certainly not 2A
Gan
Gan is the Supreme God and animating spirit of the Dark Tower, being the deity most closely associated with the abstract alignment known as The White. Although the Tower appears to be made of stone and glass, it is actually a living vessel for the spirit of Gan. Just as the ancient myths of...vsbattles.fandom.com
But what about Metaverse proves why the set of multiverses or any space contains a multiverse and beyond are larger than single multiverse?Gan, because it embeds lower layers, becoming infinitely larger than those bound.
SCP-4555's statement is just that the prior series of universes are grouped and repeated. i.e. the universes in each batch aren't "bigger", the process is just repeated.
Forget 4555, it doesn't matter too much since the Thread content is Yesod Multiverse. Another CRT will be for itIt's kind of obvious that a set of multiverses is bigger than a multiverse, that doesn't mean that it's infinitely bigger in a way that would qualify for higher tiers. It's just repeating the same worlds more often, the worlds aren't getting bigger.
The low 1-A scan doesn't qualify under vsbw standards.Will we get Low 1A God tiers in the future?
Technically there are Low 1-As that do qualify but they dont have profiles yetThe low 1-A scan doesn't qualify under vsbw standards.
Link me that on my wallI mean the remake of keter duty has the scarlet king contain a narrative anomaly and the project collab thing that went with it includes SCP-682 and SCP-001 Swann as a loop.
Bruh, the narrative characters literally scale to a Low 1-A feat already. SCP-2747, SCP-3812, The Overvoid Lurk.
If those statements solidly gave Low 1-C to everyone, this thread never would have had a Low 1-C end in the first place.Yeah just talked to Ultima about it, it would still be 'At least Low 1-C, possibly higher' from 4555 and Ad Astra
Ive asked him to comment here as he told me that both statements are fine to useIf those statements solidly gave Low 1-C to everyone, this thread never would have had a Low 1-C end in the first place.
Ultima clarified on Discord that he's not accounting for whether they scale when he says that, which is the issue Ovens, Saikou, and I had with giving definite scaling to it.
And I disagree with Ultima that Ad Astra's statement is "blatantly Low 1-C", it's ordering universes then goes into using cardinals, it's not exactly clear what they mean by "and onwards" in that context. Or in other words, they ****** up the maths, which makes it less reliably Low 1-C imo.