- 31,633
- 34,652
This looks good to me as well.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Shortly afterWell, this should be fine to apply now.
Also, when is the 682 update thread happen? Will it happen shortly after this one ends, or will it takes some time like this CRT?
What statements would take precedence over them?I am now actually kinda hesitating on how high it is.
6-D comes if we don't take the Hole In Mars/4555 statements at an "uncountably many universes" interpretation, or if we don't take them as scaling. If we do the former, they'd be ludicrously high into 6-D. Going from an infinite multiverse, to an infinite number of infinite multiverses, to an infinite number of infinite collections of infinite multiverses, and so on as deep as mathematically possible. But if we do the latter, then these statements just don't scale, so it'd be baseline 6-D.
wdym? Without those two statements scaling, 6-D comes from the first statement of there being 3 total temporal dimensions.What statements would take precedence over them?
In this case, we should scale to A Hole in Mars and 4555.wdym? Without those two statements scaling, 6-D comes from the first statement of there being 3 total temporal dimensions.
We don't have anything about god-tiers moving in them, just nuking universes that have them, which isn't a speed feat.Shouldn't be also a speed upgrade? AFAIK moving in multiple temporal dimensions is better than moving in one
apparently Brothers Death moving before the creation of time is the current immeansurable speed justification.We don't have anything about god-tiers moving in them, just nuking universes that have them, which isn't a speed feat.
I think we should find other speed feats, can we make another CRT for that?Oh yeah, we need to remove that too.
I think that's what they're working onWhat will be the justification written on the pages?
To elaborate on this a bit more: My point is that higher temporal dimensions being granted higher tiers at all comes from a generalization of the same idea that makes it so Low 2-C is above 3-A: That is, that a time axis contains an uncountably infinite number of copies of the spatial volume of the universe, and thus, adding a second temporal dimension to a 4-D spacetime, for instance, would be effectively creating a new direction which holds uncountably infinite copies of the entire lower spacetime along itself. And this condition can be met pretty easily, provided said higher temporal dimension is described as an axis in which the lower-dimensional reality is displaced, but not so much if it is described in a vacuum, with no reference point for we to scale it to.Basically, to my understanding, most higher temporal dimensions in fiction (i.e. timelines) are presented as embedding uncountably infinitely many copies of the universe, rather than just being "another direction to move in" orthogonal to the universe. While spatial dimensions are generally presented as the latter. We already accept spatial dimensions that are presented as the former as qualifying for higher tiers, but we don't really make note that temporal dimensions presented as the latter shouldn't qualify.
same, but the whole city is tooI'm disappointed. And so is my cat.
It's not just that. Low 1-C is "likely" instead of "possibly", and it scales to all god-tiers, instead of just SK/TBD and above.I'm disappointed. And so is my cat.
But I guess "Possibly Higher" is nice too.
"Possibly higher" isn't actually useful for threads. It doesn't place anywhere. It's just an acknowledgement that it can be interpreted as something higher.so, the possible higher what is exactly and where it scales?
like just above baseline? and every god tiers would be just above baseline Low 1-C which is 5D?"Possibly higher" isn't actually useful for threads. It doesn't place anywhere. It's just an acknowledgement that it can be interpreted as something higher.
No, it's a separate rating from the Low 1-C one.like just above baseline? and every god tiers would be just above baseline Low 1-C which is 5D?
but if it doesn't have a specific value to indicate something, why does it exist and why we should put it?No, it's a separate rating from the Low 1-C one.
Because there is a potential for a higher value even if it isn't definite. We've always included stuff like this on our profiles (speaking about vsbw in general). It's an acknowledgement that there's potential for something higher.but if it doesn't have a specific value to indicate something, why does it exist and why we should put it?
so basically, possilbly Higher means something that is Higher but can't be definied?Because there is a potential for a higher value even if it isn't definite. We've always included stuff like this on our profiles (speaking about vsbw in general). It's an acknowledgement that there's potential for something higher.