Scp 3812 upgrade

[Sir_Ovens]

We just disregard their statements lmao.

1) Many authors outside of SCP know about us. We're not exactly a small community. If they choose to use our lingo they're free to do so as long as their works aren't made specifically for battleboarding.

2) The commentary about our tiering system in that article isn't even accurate. There is a clear misunderstanding of our standards and as such their WoG wouldn't even be used for our purposes.

Hell the author of Parahumans has seen our pages and thinks his characters should be tiered differently. That doesn’t mean we just change things based on what he says.

 

[MattSatire]

Uh...so apparently the people on wikidot uses vs battle wiki terminology. Isn't this supposed to be illegal.

I don't think they use the term vs battle, but I think they just know

Actually SCP-3812 has entered the Noosphere in several articles but it's better for me to just ignore it for the same reason in the previous thread again and again like termination scp-682 and ketter duty if i remember correctly

because vsbattle is a big website, surely some of them know, especially if you type a certain scp, vsbattle fandom will be at the top of the search.

 

[MattSatire]

I'm going to unwatch this thread, tired with this ascend guy, I have something to do I'll just wait for the results of this thread

 

[IdiosyncraticLawyer]

We just disregard their statements lmao.

1) Many authors outside of SCP know about us. We're not exactly a small community. If they choose to use our lingo they're free to do so as long as their works aren't made specifically for battleboarding.

2) The commentary about our tiering system in that article isn't even accurate. There is a clear misunderstanding of our standards and as such their WoG wouldn't even be used for our purposes.

Hell the author of Parahumans has seen our pages and thinks his characters should be tiered differently. That doesn’t mean we just change things based on what he says.

For what it's worth, I've messaged Ike on Wikidot before and deleted our page on SCP-001 (Null Sum Proposal) based on their advice, and I'm going to explain what they got wrong on our system to them.

 

[Zeinx1]

We just disregard their statements lmao.

1) Many authors outside of SCP know about us. We're not exactly a small community. If they choose to use our lingo they're free to do so as long as their works aren't made specifically for battleboarding.

2) The commentary about our tiering system in that article isn't even accurate. There is a clear misunderstanding of our standards and as such their WoG wouldn't even be used for our purposes.

Hell the author of Parahumans has seen our pages and thinks his characters should be tiered differently. That doesn’t mean we just change things based on what he says.

I didn't see a counter argument for hume's values here, I guess you find it right, I didn't understand anything about narrative transcendence, can you explain a bit more? or can you give me your discord address?

 

[Zeinx1]

For what it's worth, I've messaged Ike on Wikidot before and deleted our page on SCP-001 (Null Sum Proposal) based on their advice, and I'm going to explain what they got wrong on our system to them.

can you look here again and tag the authorities please

 

[IdiosyncraticLawyer]

can you look here again and tag the authorities please

@Sir_Ovens @Saikou_The_Lewd_King

 

[Zeinx1]

@Sir_Ovens @Saikou_The_Lewd_King

thank you

 

[Zeinx1]

bump

 

[Zeinx1]

bump

 

[Zeinx1]

@Sir_Ovens @Saikou_The_Lewd_King

Can you take another look pls

 

[IdiosyncraticLawyer]

Can you take another look pls

They have made their stances clear. If this thread receives no more engagement in 48 hours, I'm going to consider it rejected and have it closed.

 

[Zeinx1]

They have made their stances clear. If this thread receives no more engagement in 48 hours, I'm going to consider it rejected and have it closed.

I think the authorities should at least see my answers, maybe they might change their minds, that's why I said to tag them above, but they didn't look.

 

[IdiosyncraticLawyer]

I think the authorities should at least see my answers, maybe they might change their minds, that's why I said to tag them above, but they didn't look.

Users are not entitled to unlimited attempts at trying to pester staff to re-review threads they've rejected.

 

[Zeinx1]

Users are not entitled to unlimited attempts at trying to pester staff to re-review threads they've rejected.

Got it, thank you. I'll still be waiting for them to write within 48 hours

 

[Zeinx1]

bump

 

[Zeinx1]

I guess no one will write.

 

[Zeinx1]

bump

 

[Zeinx1]

bump

 

[Zeinx1]

bump