• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
God can still be Low 1-C.

Because of Garou and Blast we know Hyperspace exists.

Depending on how One and Murata build on this concept, higher dimensions can reasonably said to be introduced eventually.

For example, space would be 3 dimensions, hyper space (similar nature to the gates, but significantly bigger) the fourth and time, the fifth dimension. Or at least that would be the ideal.

Personally, instead of hypotheticals like these I'm kind of more interested in how many people here would even be interested in Saitama reaching higher dimensional levels of power at all.

Most people I've seen seem to take the tiers beyond 2-A as confusing and "bullshit".
 
What Recon said does not make sense. Saitama reaches that level of power via Accelerated Development. It shouldn't be listed as explanation for "likely far higher".
Maybe I didn't explain myself correctly, I think that his current AP (if he retains it after merging with past Saitama that is) should be listed as 4-A likely far higher as he clearly grew far beyond his previous feats after fighting Garou and then higher with accelerated development.

English is my second language so maybe it's not worded in the best way but Imo it should be made clear in the profile that Saitama is high above his listed AP.
 
only thing I really consider bullshit is that time is seen as a dimension
It works out in physics, so there is no reason why it wouldn't work for feats especially if a character can affect the future and/or the past with their power in a way that would be relevant for Attack Potency.
 
Yeah the CSAP “debunks” are articles that describe the concept of time being a dimension as “space” for pedagogical purposes and like, one really suspect “educational” YouTube channel. It’s pretty forced.
 
It works out in physics, so there is no reason why it wouldn't work for feats especially if a character can affect the future and/or the past with their power in a way that would be relevant for Attack Potency.
I’ve never actually seen any justification for it
even worse is when people think that time itself replaces the 4th dimension when time can easily exist in any dimension
 
but it is the truth, literally uraraka is in almost the last positions of boku no hero, and for no reason,when she get better in character, in fact, i saw a screenshot of a survey of the most powerful character in anime (2022) and apparently gojo and levi are the most powerful (despite the fact that gojo has literally not destroyed infinite universes or manipulated them or anything like that, and levi is just a superhuman) and below them are saitama, zeno and goku (no seriously, what the hell)
Very profound.
 
I’ve never actually seen any justification for it
even worse is when people think that time itself replaces the 4th dimension when time can easily exist in any dimension
Is that so? It should be possible to look up why exactly time is used as a 4th dimension but if I recall correctly the origin of that view has something to do with relativity and how time can be viewed as an additional axis to the three spatial dimensions we can perceive.
 
Is that so? It should be possible to look up why exactly time is used as a 4th dimension but if I recall correctly the origin of that view has something to do with relativity and how time can be viewed as an additional axis to the three spatial dimensions we can perceive.
Yes, it's called a temporal dimension. While the others are spatial. It's a way to measure change.
 
the biggest issue is that I can't find any kind of definition of dimension that even remotely acknowledges time
but even if it was a "temporal dimension" it wouldn't even be comparable to an actual one, since dimensions include things like length, width, and height, while time can't really go like, sideways? From what I can tell the only reason people call it a dimension is because "you need time in order to move" but time just goes in one direction unlike any other dimension.
I'd prefer is someone actually had an explanation that made sense but none seem to exist
 
the biggest issue is that I can't find any kind of definition of dimension that even remotely acknowledges time
but even if it was a "temporal dimension" it wouldn't even be comparable to an actual one, since dimensions include things like length, width, and height, while time can't really go like, sideways? From what I can tell the only reason people call it a dimension is because "you need time in order to move" but time just goes in one direction unlike any other dimension.
I'd prefer is someone actually had an explanation that made sense but none seem to exist
4th dimension isn't really for human perception. We can only perceive 3 dimensions.
 
the biggest issue is that I can't find any kind of definition of dimension that even remotely acknowledges time
but even if it was a "temporal dimension" it wouldn't even be comparable to an actual one, since dimensions include things like length, width, and height, while time can't really go like, sideways? From what I can tell the only reason people call it a dimension is because "you need time in order to move" but time just goes in one direction unlike any other dimension.
I'd prefer is someone actually had an explanation that made sense but none seem to exist
No single dimension has length, width and height on its own as far as I'm aware since all three of these things can only exist in three dimensions together. Time moving in only one way actually has a Wikipedia article called the arrow of time.
 
No single dimension has length, width and height on its own as far as I'm aware since all three of these things can only exist in three dimensions together. Time moving in only one way actually has a Wikipedia article called the arrow of time.
well yeah that's what I meant, I was just listing them all not using them all at once
 
well yeah that's what I meant, I was just listing them all not using them all at once
As far as I'm aware using time as a dimension works well with formulas and nobody really has an explanation why time as a dimension is different from other dimensions in the sense that it only ever moves into one direction as far as we can tell.
 
on top of the fact that time can exist in a 2d or 1d space, I think it's safe to say that time is at the very least a different concept entirely from the the 4th dimension in particular
 
on top of the fact that time can exist in a 2d or 1d space, I think it's safe to say that time is at the very least a different concept entirely from the the 4th dimension in particular
Well, it would be different from a 4th spatial dimension though time is still an integral part of the space-time continuum.
 
well sure, space time continuum and stuff is nice but that doesn't mean that time is related to AP at all, since destroying stuff on a 4d(spatial) level is the equivalent of being infinite on a 3d as each dimension is infinitely larger than the previous, but instead we use time for some reason which is
absolutely weird to me
 
well sure, space time continuum and stuff is nice but that doesn't mean that time is related to AP at all, since destroying stuff on a 4d(spatial) level is the equivalent of being infinite on a 3d as each dimension is infinitely larger than the previous, but instead we use time for some reason which is
absolutely weird to me
Well, Immeasurable characters are certainly capable of using time like an axis of movement and destroying an infinite time-space continuum does seem like something that should be superior to simply destroying the infinite amount of things that may or may not exist within it to me.
 
except destroying something in the past would also destroy it in the future by default, seems unquantifiable at best when considering time manipulation characters
 
except destroying something in the past would also destroy it in the future by default, seems unquantifiable at best when considering time manipulation characters
Why would that be relevant? There is no past or future if time itself is destroyed, so why would that something's future destroyed be relevant by comparison?
 
Why would that be relevant? There is no past or future if time itself is destroyed, so why would that something's future destroyed be relevant by comparison?
well if time itself is destroyed then that'd be like destroying space
in the sense that it isn't something tangible that can be interacted with, so it'd be more like a complicated EE or spatial manipulation
 
well if time itself is destroyed then that'd be like destroying space
in the sense that it isn't something tangible that can be interacted with, so it'd be more like a complicated EE or spatial manipulation
That sounds like a pretty complicated idea when you consider higher-dimensional objects in this context.
 
The one whom I originally quoted before you started this conversation with me was Zillerthebucko and their comment looked like this:
Oh. Then I think the very first comment of mine you quoted was a misclick lmao, because I wasn't talking about that at all lmao.
 
I found a calc in another site that results in Suiryu cloud dispersing feat being 55 kilotons (7-C) 🤔
 
the biggest issue is that I can't find any kind of definition of dimension that even remotely acknowledges time
but even if it was a "temporal dimension" it wouldn't even be comparable to an actual one, since dimensions include things like length, width, and height, while time can't really go like, sideways? From what I can tell the only reason people call it a dimension is because "you need time in order to move" but time just goes in one direction unlike any other dimension.
I'd prefer is someone actually had an explanation that made sense but none seem to exist
Yeah temporal dimensions aren't the same as spatial dimensions in every aspect. The "only goes one way" thing is what most people consider an example of that.
 
Bruh, this thread got unfollowed, luckily I only had to read like 1.5 pages🫠

my 2 cents and the god discussion pretty sure the fanmanga has god being at a higher dimension, so tier 2 minimum, and with recent events it’s seem that murata and ONE got some slight inspo from the fan manga.
 
Huh just learnt about the fan manga. Wacky. Maybe they are going the "GOD caused chapter 164 with time travel" thing if it's drawing inspiration from that lol.
 
Last edited:
Hey, do you think God has conscience over time? Like, even if future was reversed, he still know about it?

I doubt it tbf, since, even after he killed future Garou by using wrong his powers, he still left present Garou alive, and didn't take his powers off (otherwise he'd have died like Homeless Emperor or Future Garou did).

Maybe his powers went out because he was defeated like what (most likely) happened with Psykos? Or maybe it was a PIS to let Garou alive for future arcs
 
Back
Top