Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In the audiobook series there's an alternate universe where Saitama and co are middle school/high school children. It was amusingly enough stated to be a parallel universe.What are you referring to?
but uh, 4d is higher dimensional, which is tier 2 at best so....High 3-A, Low 2-C, or 2-A I think. Maybe even Low 1-C if God is a higher dimensional entity and just uses avatars to interact with the 3-D world.
Which Lucifer?saitama vs lucifer who wins in a fight
we waitbut uh, 4d is higher dimensional, which is tier 2 at best so....
Maybe I didn't explain myself correctly, I think that his current AP (if he retains it after merging with past Saitama that is) should be listed as 4-A likely far higher as he clearly grew far beyond his previous feats after fighting Garou and then higher with accelerated development.What Recon said does not make sense. Saitama reaches that level of power via Accelerated Development. It shouldn't be listed as explanation for "likely far higher".
Yeah. I've seen other people with this opinion too.only thing I really consider bullshit is that time is seen as a dimension
It works out in physics, so there is no reason why it wouldn't work for feats especially if a character can affect the future and/or the past with their power in a way that would be relevant for Attack Potency.only thing I really consider bullshit is that time is seen as a dimension
I’ve never actually seen any justification for itIt works out in physics, so there is no reason why it wouldn't work for feats especially if a character can affect the future and/or the past with their power in a way that would be relevant for Attack Potency.
Very profound.but it is the truth, literally uraraka is in almost the last positions of boku no hero, and for no reason,when she get better in character, in fact, i saw a screenshot of a survey of the most powerful character in anime (2022) and apparently gojo and levi are the most powerful (despite the fact that gojo has literally not destroyed infinite universes or manipulated them or anything like that, and levi is just a superhuman) and below them are saitama, zeno and goku (no seriously, what the hell)
Is that so? It should be possible to look up why exactly time is used as a 4th dimension but if I recall correctly the origin of that view has something to do with relativity and how time can be viewed as an additional axis to the three spatial dimensions we can perceive.I’ve never actually seen any justification for it
even worse is when people think that time itself replaces the 4th dimension when time can easily exist in any dimension
Yes, it's called a temporal dimension. While the others are spatial. It's a way to measure change.Is that so? It should be possible to look up why exactly time is used as a 4th dimension but if I recall correctly the origin of that view has something to do with relativity and how time can be viewed as an additional axis to the three spatial dimensions we can perceive.
I'm already aware of that.Yes, it's called a temporal dimension. While the others are spatial. It's a way to measure change.
Cool.I'm already aware of that.
4th dimension isn't really for human perception. We can only perceive 3 dimensions.the biggest issue is that I can't find any kind of definition of dimension that even remotely acknowledges time
but even if it was a "temporal dimension" it wouldn't even be comparable to an actual one, since dimensions include things like length, width, and height, while time can't really go like, sideways? From what I can tell the only reason people call it a dimension is because "you need time in order to move" but time just goes in one direction unlike any other dimension.
I'd prefer is someone actually had an explanation that made sense but none seem to exist
No single dimension has length, width and height on its own as far as I'm aware since all three of these things can only exist in three dimensions together. Time moving in only one way actually has a Wikipedia article called the arrow of time.the biggest issue is that I can't find any kind of definition of dimension that even remotely acknowledges time
but even if it was a "temporal dimension" it wouldn't even be comparable to an actual one, since dimensions include things like length, width, and height, while time can't really go like, sideways? From what I can tell the only reason people call it a dimension is because "you need time in order to move" but time just goes in one direction unlike any other dimension.
I'd prefer is someone actually had an explanation that made sense but none seem to exist
well yeah that's what I meant, I was just listing them all not using them all at onceNo single dimension has length, width and height on its own as far as I'm aware since all three of these things can only exist in three dimensions together. Time moving in only one way actually has a Wikipedia article called the arrow of time.
As far as I'm aware using time as a dimension works well with formulas and nobody really has an explanation why time as a dimension is different from other dimensions in the sense that it only ever moves into one direction as far as we can tell.well yeah that's what I meant, I was just listing them all not using them all at once
Well, it would be different from a 4th spatial dimension though time is still an integral part of the space-time continuum.on top of the fact that time can exist in a 2d or 1d space, I think it's safe to say that time is at the very least a different concept entirely from the the 4th dimension in particular
Well, Immeasurable characters are certainly capable of using time like an axis of movement and destroying an infinite time-space continuum does seem like something that should be superior to simply destroying the infinite amount of things that may or may not exist within it to me.well sure, space time continuum and stuff is nice but that doesn't mean that time is related to AP at all, since destroying stuff on a 4d(spatial) level is the equivalent of being infinite on a 3d as each dimension is infinitely larger than the previous, but instead we use time for some reason which is
absolutely weird to me
Why would that be relevant? There is no past or future if time itself is destroyed, so why would that something's future destroyed be relevant by comparison?except destroying something in the past would also destroy it in the future by default, seems unquantifiable at best when considering time manipulation characters
well if time itself is destroyed then that'd be like destroying spaceWhy would that be relevant? There is no past or future if time itself is destroyed, so why would that something's future destroyed be relevant by comparison?
That sounds like a pretty complicated idea when you consider higher-dimensional objects in this context.well if time itself is destroyed then that'd be like destroying space
in the sense that it isn't something tangible that can be interacted with, so it'd be more like a complicated EE or spatial manipulation
Don’t worry I’ll let it slideSo BoS Genos’ Class M rating has no justification :V
Oh. Then I think the very first comment of mine you quoted was a misclick lmao, because I wasn't talking about that at all lmao.The one whom I originally quoted before you started this conversation with me was Zillerthebucko and their comment looked like this:
Yeah temporal dimensions aren't the same as spatial dimensions in every aspect. The "only goes one way" thing is what most people consider an example of that.the biggest issue is that I can't find any kind of definition of dimension that even remotely acknowledges time
but even if it was a "temporal dimension" it wouldn't even be comparable to an actual one, since dimensions include things like length, width, and height, while time can't really go like, sideways? From what I can tell the only reason people call it a dimension is because "you need time in order to move" but time just goes in one direction unlike any other dimension.
I'd prefer is someone actually had an explanation that made sense but none seem to exist