• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
I already explained why I didn't use 609 metres. Again, they're mountains, but A) we only see the part of them, B) the crater size is totally inconsistent with 609 metres, and C) mountains don't actually have to be 609 metres, that's just kind of a minimum we've been using because it's fairly typical. The smallest mountain on Earth is 43 metres.
From this pic we get a pretty good view of the Mountain and surrounding Mountains. All of them are pretty similar in height. Would assuming the mountain to be around 300 meters be better? Since from what I've seen most geologists consider mountains to be at least 300-600 meters at least. Also that speck is a mountain in name alone, its nothing more than a large mound.
 
Again, we don't actually see the bottom there, otherwise there'd probably be some kind of slope on the first mountain. Also, none of that eliminates my previous issues, especially since you can see that a massive portion of one mountain isn't that much larger than forest trees.

Mountains are just craggier and steeper hills. Plus, Murata, to our knowledge, isn't a geologist.

For reference, the portion of the mountain we see in this panel is 100 metres, which seems reasonable for a mountain top.
 
Last edited:
Also just wondering, has anyone ever called Tatsumaki reacting to the shells? I recall a calc for it being MHS but I can't find it
 
mb, I was pretty heated due to the Hancock vs Fubuki thread, I just don't see how a guy who makes someone's shoulders crack multiple times is weaker than a guy who only made him spit blood and have a nose bleed, but I don't really care that much since it's just for some hypothetical scenario I thought up that probably isn't likely since this Garou needs to do something over 7-A which isn't necessary to fighting Bang and Fubuki.
I agree. Spiral Garou did internal damage (you can call it headcanon if you want) and got a nosebleed after all those attacks. With Cross Fang all that damage is going through Darkshine's body and coming out the other side and still pulverizing a block sized area, not even leaving a scratch on Darkshine's muscles though.

Yes they should scale, it's just that Darkshines dura >> his AP. Garou's technique can subvert that difference though.
 
Spiral Garou absolutely scales to Darkshine.
He matches his punch right after Darkshine says he’s gonna use his full power
 
I agree. Spiral Garou did internal damage (you can call it headcanon if you want) and got a nosebleed after all those attacks. With Cross Fang all that damage is going through Darkshine's body and coming out the other side and still pulverizing a block sized area, not even leaving a scratch on Darkshine's muscles though.

Yes they should scale, it's just that Darkshines dura >> his AP. Garou's technique can subvert that difference though.
But it's never stated that Garou or any of his techniques can negate durability tho, and I'm pretty sure you can make someone bleed without having to blow a hole in them
 
I don't think it's actually stated that it cuts from the inside, more like it slices through everything.
 
But it's never stated that Garou or any of his techniques can negate durability tho, and I'm pretty sure you can make someone bleed without having to blow a hole in them
The shockwaves from Cross Fang travel through Darkshine's body, hit his internal organs on the way through and come out the other side. Do you think Darkshine's insides are as durable as his muscles? Cross Fang hits with a targeted, pentrating precision that raw power doesn't, so whether or not it's explicitly dura neg, it would more likely damage Darkshine's internals where more brutish attacks of comparable power (like Darkshine's own punches) would be mostly absorbed by his muscles and skin
 
About nearly a year ago, I made a thread (It turned to be a mess now due to the form move) asking whether or not Garou did harm Darkshine by bypassing his durability and skin, therefore attacking his internal organs, causing him to bleed. But they said it just meant that Garou grew strong enough to harm Darkshine and that's how blunt force attacks work.
 
Last edited:
Void Sky aura ripping fist or whatever it’s called is just a diet version of the cross fang dragonslayer and it sent a shockwave that moved through EC’s body.
 
Why would you divide the result?

At the very best, all I see is "At most High 6-A", but it's still very iffy
 
I don't think he should scale to the serious punch either.

I was talking about the surface destruction before, just in case anybody tries to link me to these shenanigans.
 
Idek what the discussion is about cause I'm barely paying attention but no way Boros can remotely scale to the Serious Punch if that's being debated. I don't even understand the reasoning for that.
 
About nearly a year ago, I made a thread (It turned to be a mess now due to the form move) asking whether or not Garou did harm Darkshine by bypassing his durability and skin, therefore attacking his internal organs, causing him to bleed. But they said it just meant that Garou grew strong enough to harm Darkshine and that's how blunt force attacks work.
Well it's not blunt force and that's not how that works, Garou is equal to Darkshine at that point and Darkshine can't harm himself- yet Garou does. Why is that? Why would one attack with X force not do damage when another attack with X force does? It comes down to the specifics of the technique and how the energy is distributed.
 
Well it's not blunt force and that's not how that works, Garou is equal to Darkshine at that point and Darkshine can't harm himself- yet Garou does. Why is that? Why would one attack with X force not do damage when another attack with X force does? It comes down to the specifics of the technique and how the energy is distributed.
That's what they said to me and I was apparently convinced of that and for some other reason that I don't quite remember now. But basically, they said something that Garou simply became strong enough to harm Darkshine, and it is true that Darkshine's durability is significantly above his own AP to the point he claims he isn't even able to hurt himself. However; after Garou matched a punch from Darkshine and got his shirt tore off, Darkshine's strength wasn't indicated to be on the level of Garou's anymore. Garou's strength, on the other hand, was stated by Darkshine himself to have continuously increased during their fight. So their stats at the end of the fight in my opinion are like this:

Darkshine's durability (1) > Garou's strength (2) ~ Garou's durability (3) > Darkshine's strength.

(1) is because Darkshine withstood all of Garou's attacks with only minor injuries.
(2) is because Garou could match Darkshine's strength previously and continuously grew even stronger as their fight went on, strong enough to harm him but could not cause any serious injuries.
(3) is because Garou could withstand Darkshine's powerful attacks with little to no issues.
 
Could this be used?
072.jpg
078.jpg
 
Also, can we fix Boros' page? The link for his Rel+, shows the moon kick which was previously accepted at 75% SoL, even though we changed it to 90% SoL.
 
Back
Top