- 2,926
- 1,399
The Sonic thing is still going to be MHS and will be casting a lot of characters, so it's not going to change much.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
STRONGEST One-Punch Man Discussion Thread!
- Thread starter Phoenks
- Start date
- 24,475
- 25,521
Also why does phoenix man have a 10-C key? Seems extremely pointless imo
- 1,289
- 786
My calc with Sonic was accepted by two people. Your calc has not been accepted by anyone.
- 1,289
- 786
Thank you
- 24,475
- 25,521
You can also use the sandbox feature for convenience if you haven't known already
- 2,926
- 1,399
I did not ask for anyone's evaluation, I am expecting some things.
- 2,608
- 859
God, this is turning into a toxic debate...
- 1,289
- 786
I didn't notice this.
Is it? In my opinion, Psykos beam was accepted as MHS+. I was told that recently it was accepted that Sub-Relativistic for dodging Psycos beam was unjustified, because Tatsumaki is not so casually and not so close to it reacts to the beams.
- 24,475
- 25,521
Tats didn't casually dodge them enough, or at least she wasn't above psykorochi in speed enough to be considered to Sub-Rel
- 1,289
- 786
To be honest, it seems to me that taking the timeframe in that scene as 1 second is wank.
Even Lightning Max managed to observe the beam from a distance for several seconds.
Even Lightning Max managed to observe the beam from a distance for several seconds.
- 24,475
- 25,521
Because they were far away? That was discussed before, we used the average human timeframe for people to react to find the speed
- 3,996
- 2,789
I'm the guy who made the 1 second calc if you're referring to the beam speed in general. Why would a character with superhuman reaction times need several seconds to process a large explosion that is a couple dozen kilometers distant? Realistically, a regular human would not even need a full second to respond to a giant bright flash that lasts for a moment. The longer we make the time frame, the more explanations we have to make to explain who is doing what and how. Personally I think the beams travelled the distance in under a second, but I understand that many people will have interpreted the scene as taking longer
- 1,289
- 786
Well, okay. But I very much doubt that in anime the timeframe will also be 1 second.
- 24,475
- 25,521
We should stop relying on the whole "wait for the anime" thing. Let's be real with ourselves, at this rate the psykorochi fight will be animated over half a decade later.
- 1,289
- 786
@Ourosboros
As I recall, you are very good at calculating with the deflagration method. Here I calculated the width of the Genos beam 157.520523498 meters.
And in this scan, the beam is incredibly thin compared to the explosion. Do you think it is possible to use the deflagration method here? The explosion feels like the purest bundle of energy.
As I recall, you are very good at calculating with the deflagration method. Here I calculated the width of the Genos beam 157.520523498 meters.
And in this scan, the beam is incredibly thin compared to the explosion. Do you think it is possible to use the deflagration method here? The explosion feels like the purest bundle of energy.
- 24,475
- 25,521
That was calced to be High 7-A iirc@Ourosboros
As I recall, you are very good at calculating with the deflagration method. Here I calculated the width of the Genos beam 157.520523498 meters.
And in this scan, the beam is incredibly thin compared to the explosion. Do you think it is possible to use the deflagration method here? The explosion feels like the purest bundle of energy.
- 1,289
- 786
Then, in a couple of days I will try to start this topic. I will say all my arguments FOR a timeframe in a few seconds.
- 1,289
- 786
Yes? I just made a quick calculation and got 18 gigatons.
- 3,996
- 2,789
I can calc it with deflagration, but using the beam width would be unreliable as we can see the beams growing wider as they arc up towards the explosion (and the origin point of the beams is cut off in the feat panel)- I can however scale it to the clouds. Someone please remind me in a few days, I am finishing up moving now@Ourosboros
As I recall, you are very good at calculating with the deflagration method. Here I calculated the width of the Genos beam 157.520523498 meters.
And in this scan, the beam is incredibly thin compared to the explosion. Do you think it is possible to use the deflagration method here? The explosion feels like the purest bundle of energy.
- 1,289
- 786
If the rays become wider, does it mean that this enhances the result? Thanks anyway.
Sounds interesting. I have no idea what it will look like.
Ok.
- 1,289
- 786
And now 1.7 teratons...
- 1,289
- 786
And now 128 exatons.
I think this is worth stopping at.
I think this is worth stopping at.
- 3,996
- 2,789
Lmao how did you get this one, I'd like to take a look at this method. Not saying it's wrong but maybe I could learn something from it
- 24,475
- 25,521
That seems like a reach
- 3,996
- 2,789
If I had to guess eyeballing this feat, it's probably teratons, 6-B or 6-A. But maybe higher, maybe lower
- 24,475
- 25,521
I think there were like 3 variants to this? High 7-C, High 7-A and 6-B
- 1,289
- 786
Well. This method was an experiment. To some extent comic. I made it out of pure interest.
I thought, what if the beam of Genos becomes evenly larger? I got that at the very bottom of the page the beam width is 1.4 pixels. And closer to the explosion itself, there are already 6.4 pixels. And then, I found the distance between them (15 kilometers). I assumed that every 15 kilometers the beam becomes 4.5 times larger than it was. I assumed that they are at an altitude of 90 kilometers.
As a result, I got that the width of the explosion is three times the diameter of our planet.
I love calculations.
- 1,289
- 786
Virgin Collapsing Star Roaring Cannon <<<<<<<<<< Chad True Spiral Incineration Cannon
- 24,475
- 25,521
Get out
- 1,289
- 786
To be honest, I was surprised that only Saitama had Level 0 on April 1st.
I mean, it would be even funnier if Boros got 5-B. It would be cruel.
I mean, it would be even funnier if Boros got 5-B. It would be cruel.
- 18,685
- 16,253
Imagine if your calc gets accepted....
- 24,475
- 25,521
No
- 15,306
- 15,504
Yeah, that’s not happening
- 24,475
- 25,521
With all the downgrades for speed that's bouta happened, at least we still have Rel+ Boros and Saitama. And FTL for just Saitama
- 15,306
- 15,504
- 1,289
- 786
- 15,306
- 15,504
Flash about to get downgraded too lmao
- 1,289
- 786
To be honest, this is pretty weird. Boros needs an aura to move at nearly the speed of light and not burn up in the atmosphere. But at the same time, according to calculations, Flash is not much slower than him. It is close enough in speed to Boros.
- 1,289
- 786
What? Flash will be downgraded?
