• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
There's not even the remotest consistency in characters one-shotting each other, especially within verses themselves (NNT loves changing it up), so I disagree.
 
Last edited:
First of all, this still doesn't mean that power levels are seen as linear or consistent on the wiki either way
secondly, obviously if a way a specific verse worked was completely contradicting how the wiki assumes, then of course the verse would take precedence. The suggestion was geared towards a multiplier that would be used until proven otherwise
Goku throttled Nappa with only a few time difference via basic Kaioken.
Went from stronger but still comparable, to whipping out a 2x multiplier and crippling him.

DBZ just has one shots and stomps with negligible to a few times difference at worst.
 
On that note, Vegeta (who was also suppressed at the time) was well under 3x Goku/full power Nappa when he one-shot Nappa.

And it's implied suppressed Vegeta could have heavily injured Kaioken x2 Goku with a single blast if he didn't make it easier to dodge.
 
Here’s what I would have proposed, a minimum limit for the multiplier for one shotting, perhaps 2 times would be fine enough. In the case where it’s proven that a verse has a different one shot threshold then for that verse only the standard wouldn’t apply. But just because there’s verses with an incredibly low or high multiplier, doesn’t mean we should just screw over scaling chains in the verses without an established one shot threshold, ultimately there’s no reason for us to not have a “default” multiplier assumption for when there is a lack of info. Especially considering that if there ever was a lack of one shot requirements in that verse, it would also mean the multiplier wouldn’t be inconsistent with anything either.
Goku throttled Nappa with only a few time difference via basic Kaioken.
Went from stronger but still comparable, to whipping out a 2x multiplier and crippling him.

DBZ just has one shots and stomps with negligible to a few times difference at worst.
Well this is fair. Dragon ball is just one of thousands and thousands of verses though.
There's not even the remotest consistency in characters one-shotting each other, especially within verses themselves (NNT, especially), so I disagree.
This is a generalization, but I sorta agree that this can be true often. Regardless I stand by what I said above.

If the site aims to be as accurate as possible, then we should start with not having Jotaro scaling chains occur (for lack of a better term, since it’s insane how he was like 1.1 times away from the upscale value and has an absolutely massive scaling chain lol) and just go with some kind of bare minimum 2x or so multiplier for AP stomps happening, which would at least be closer to accurate than characters with insane scaling amounting to nothing.
 
I still say no to a minimum limit for something this insanely arbitrary (as in the thought processes of authors themselves, not your suggestion) and inconsistent in fictional media; it's literally not accurate, and that's the problem. But I'd be lying if I also said I wasn't rooting for it to happen.
 
I still say no to a minimum limit for something this insanely arbitrary (as in the thought processes of authors themselves, not your suggestion) and inconsistent in fictional media; it's literally not accurate, and that's the problem. But I'd be lying if I also said I wasn't rooting for it to happen.
I feel as though a compromise can be made if we just keep the multiplier fairly low, or compared it to real life situations, like the amount stronger you'd on average have to be to no sell an someone's full strength attack
here's my logic train, to make it the most fair
while some people would say a one shot should take 7.5 times or something, if we keep the multiplier to something low like x2 or even x1.5 then it reduces how much we downplay characters and also guarantees it's not wank.
Usually when a character scales massively above their value then we know they're way higher but can't really quantify it, maybe a character at 1 billion joules got his value by completely tanking the full force of then and casually one shotting a character who scales above another character, who scales above that 1 billion joules. While some would agree "there's no way this guy isn't like 100 times stronger", I think the safe bet is to keep a small multiplier, so while with the 1.5 it would never reach that 100 times or whatever headcanon value, it would also be significantly closer to what they should be, than what the actual value they scale to is
like, we have point A as the value they get their scaling from, and point B as their value, and point C as what a highball might look like for their scaling chain's value
it would go from being this:
A/B - - - C
to this
A - B - - - - - C
while we would retain what would be a lowball in these situations, we'd at least be getting much closer to what the truth probably is as opposed to just not having it do any amp at all.

what I'm basically saying is, while a multiplier being too high would be very bad, a multiplier being a little too low would keep things in a safe ballpark, while being a minor solution to the issue of scaling chains amounting to nothing, and people having to resort to their own headcanon in vs threads as to if a character who upscales from a value would be able to harm a character who, say, downscales from a significantly higher value (but within the same tier, or at least lower end of a higher tier or whatever)
a less controversial minimal multiplier, is far superior to no multiplier at all. There's my case.
 
TBH there's a massive difference between knockout one-shots (wich might just be a skill/speed/the enemy being unaware difference like the anime neck slap) where even irl you can knockout someone stronger than you by landing a hit in the hit place with one punch and instant death oneshots where a character donuts or severely gores the one they killed, like Diavolo putting a hole through other stand users's chests, Saitama one-shot exploding monsters and Goku vaporizing enemies with his Kamehameha damage amp.
 
Saitama was probably an insane martial artist in his earlier training years, since there still existed threats he had to outskill
but until cosmic garou, he had forgotten he had that potential in him, which is why he didn't know he could copy time travel unless garou reminded him of his skill. If saitama had never outclassed the rest of the verse in strength, he'd have continued being a god tier martial artist, even better than garou lol
it lines up, since he also shows some action movie looking style when fighting the subterraneans in his dream.
 
nanatsu no taizai powerlevels are SHIT.
merlin is the greatest example, being blitzed by Galand and then stomping and having higher reaction speed than the two of the strongest demons without even a major buff, the only excuse for it is that she "forgot who she was" back then.......................


merlin with 4k of powerlevel is stronger than 99% of the verse 💀
 
How good Saitama as a fighter, can he defete Bang in a haxless equal stats battle
Yes, if Saitama is serious.

He casually copied several moves from Garou's God Slaying Fist, a style of fighting which, in terms of raw skill, capabilities, and power amps, dwarfs any style Bang knows into utter insignificance. Saitama has more natural stamina and endurance. Saitama has shown the ability to strategize and use his environment while in combat, though to a limited extent. And he outright learned how to manipulate time just by looking at Garou trying to do it.

Honestly, Bang gets low-diffed even with equal stats.
 
the same goes for kurama, which is stronger than all bijuus together, i mean, 50% kurama>>>>> 5 bijuus....
why didnt akatsuki capture kurama first with a powerful combo and then uses it to capture the left bijuus?
💀

and she is meant to be just a % of juubis power, and yet she is stronger than all eight bijuus combined oof
 
the same goes for kurama, which is stronger than all bijuus together, i mean, 50% kurama>>>>> 5 bijuus....
why didnt akatsuki capture kurama first with a powerful combo and then uses it to capture the left bijuus?
💀

and she is meant to be just a % of juubis power, and yet she is stronger than all eight bijuus combined oof
Well that makes more sense. The Merlin point is totally valid, but naturally, the plot would avoid the Akatsuki immediately targeting our MC's Tailed-Beast, especially to give Naruto the time to train and grow so he can face them without it seeming contrived. From an in-universe perspective it's weird and makes the Akatsuki look stupid, but from a story perspective I can totally understand it.
 
Tbh, while I'm perfectly fine with Saitama's new rate of growth, and to some extent his power mimicry, I do feel it's a bit weird to make Saitama also be a genius that can learn insane things with ease. While it sort of makes sense under the context of what the limiter actually defines (it isn't just power, but limitations as a whole, thus, removing it would make Saitama's limit of knowledge also removed), it still just feels weird for Saitama to apparently be the most skilled fighter in existence when he feels like it, especially because a consistent plot point used as a joke is that Saitama isn't very bright or talented. Even ONE himself has said that Saitama'd be terrible in sports because Saitama doesn't know how to play sports.
 
Well that makes more sense. The Merlin point is totally valid, but naturally, the plot would avoid the Akatsuki immediately targeting our MC's Tailed-Beast, especially to give Naruto the time to train and grow so he can face them without it seeming contrived. From an in-universe perspective it's weird and makes the Akatsuki look stupid, but from a story perspective I can totally understand it.
I recall there being a thing where the Akatsuki were supposed to capture the Bijuu in number order, from the One-Tail to the Nine-Tails, but they kinda just… didn’t do that in canon so I dunno what the deal was.
 
Tbh, while I'm perfectly fine with Saitama's new rate of growth, and to some extent his power mimicry, I do feel it's a bit weird to make Saitama also be a genius that can learn insane things with ease. While it sort of makes sense under the context of what the limiter actually defines (it isn't just power, but limitations as a whole, thus, removing it would make Saitama's limit of knowledge also removed), it still just feels weird for Saitama to apparently be the most skilled fighter in existence when he feels like it, especially because a consistent plot point used as a joke is that Saitama isn't very bright or talented. Even ONE himself has said that Saitama'd be terrible in sports because Saitama doesn't know how to play sports.
I think the intended interpretation is that saitama is an incredible guy, but he got so strong that he was never able to express himself any more, so he just comes off as a boring dude
think back to his training and drive to fight monsters, back when he was working insanely hard to become strong. It'd make sense that in that time, he adapted some martial arts skill to become the strongest fighter he could. He used to use effort, but he became laid back since nothing can even be an obstacle to him anymore
 
I recall there being a thing where the Akatsuki were supposed to capture the Bijuu in number order, from the One-Tail to the Nine-Tails, but they kinda just… didn’t do that in canon so I dunno what the deal was.
this theory is totally ******* when you remember that the first bijuus captured were 5 tails and 7 tails.
actually, shukaku was the third one
naruto's verse is nonsense
 
this theory is totally ******* when you remember that the first bijuus captured were 5 tails and 7 tails.
actually, shukaku was the third one
naruto's verse is nonsense
It’s not a theory, it’s canon, and I literally said that the Akatsuki didn’t actually do it in order ☠️
 
Pretty sure they captured Fu before Gaara, unless I’m thinking of non-canon shit.
no, they did capture Fuu and Han before.
Deidara mentioned this, when talking to Naruto.
he said that Gaara was the only jinchuriki which friends were there for him and came to rescue after being captured by akatsuki
 
Last edited:
The same logic applies to both unironically.
Not really because Saitama is explicitly stated to have no limit to his growth numerous times. Although you really have to stretch to argue against Garou getting to 3A, for Saitama it's physically impossible to deny that he could reach that level.
 
Saitama looks at himself in the mirror, tries his hardest and starts copying himself so his baseline becomes his peak and does that nonstop for 3 more years
 
god boosted Tatsumaki would be cool, but i really can't see it happening in near future. Specially when fighting another hero for somewhat petty reasons.
 
I expected more than enhanced energy beams from a god enhanced esper tbh. Specially from a giant monster king shapeshifting martial arts master Kaiju fused Esper.
well, psykorochi was the only thing availabe atm for GOD.
his true objective there was Tatsumaki, it never was Psykos.
The proof is that he did give his hand for her, he wanted tatsumaki as his avatar.
and honestly, she would've become more badass than Garou
 
imagine tatsumaki throwing planets and stars at saitama, shaking milkway with her TK, creating black holes with gravity manipulation
maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaan.
also, if she is actually upgraded with the new calcs, it would make me even more hyped to think about her GOD'S form. Like, small planet level+ GOD's buff, the powerlevel that she could reach is massive, prob higher than garou's
 
god boosted Tatsumaki would be cool, but i really can't see it happening in near future. Specially when fighting another hero for somewhat petty reasons.
i can see it happening in only one ocasion, where GOD wants to play with blast's feelings, knowing that he have sweet feelings for tatsumaki
 
Well that makes more sense. The Merlin point is totally valid, but naturally, the plot would avoid the Akatsuki immediately targeting our MC's Tailed-Beast, especially to give Naruto the time to train and grow so he can face them without it seeming contrived. From an in-universe perspective it's weird and makes the Akatsuki look stupid, but from a story perspective I can totally understand it.
to be fair most biju except garu naruto bee were known villages others were outlaws apart naruto was protected by jiraya kakashi and several others and even itachi inside akatsuki logically more complicated to get
 
Not really because Saitama is explicitly stated to have no limit to his growth numerous times. Although you really have to stretch to argue against Garou getting to 3A, for Saitama it's physically impossible to deny that he could reach that level.
Even if Saitama has more limit statements that don't mean the same logic for Garou's copying doesn't apply according to the wiki. He didn't reach 3-A or even 3-B therefore he cannot so it's NLF to assume he can.
 
Not really because Saitama is explicitly stated to have no limit to his growth numerous times. Although you really have to stretch to argue against Garou getting to 3A, for Saitama it's physically impossible to deny that he could reach that level.
A limitless statement didn’t save the Garou thread from rejection
 
Back
Top