- 10,275
- 17,264
Should hopefully be a pretty simple thread.
I’m changing the provided examples on the Abstract Existence page that aren’t applicable anymore, either through them having bad explanations, no scans or them not even having that level of AE anymore, this is exactly in the same vein as my previous thread on our Regeneration page.
There’s also other small changes I’m making, mostly grammatical ones, but the biggest change of these small changes would be me changing the obligation of referencing the exact type of concept for conceptual abstractions, and making it so it's applicable with every other type of abstract existence. It doesn’t make sense to me why we would only require/heavily insinuate those with conceptual abstractions to reference the exact type of concept they embody/purely exist as, and not have say, those with informational AE reference the exact type of information manipulation they have, or just reference the fact they embody/purely exist as "information" at least.
For a more visual example of what I’m advocating, here’s Alucard’s profile, as you can see, the profile references the level of AE he possesses, which is Type 1, and the specific type he possesses, which is thoughts. Not only is this an overall more aesthetically pleasing explanation, but it also provides a little bit more context to the exact “type” these abstract characters possess. If anyone has a better way to explain this idea compared to what I’ve provided then please post it, and if it’s majority agreed upon i’ll add it to the blog.
I’ve also added examples to our Conceptual Manipulation page, which surprisingly doesn’t have either examples or a sub-sect “users” section. Which, considering the fact Conceptual Manipulation is one the largest and most important abilities we have on our wiki, is puzzling to say the least.
So here’s the blog which contains the newly changed Abstract Existence and Conceptual Manipulation examples, here’s both of our pages for both respective abilities so y’all can cross examine everything. If y’all have better examples for both pages than let me know and i’ll add them.
Voting:
Agree - @LephyrTheRevanchist, @KLOL506, @Planck69, @Theglassman12, @Dereck03, @DarkDragonMedeus
Disagree -
Neutral -
I’m changing the provided examples on the Abstract Existence page that aren’t applicable anymore, either through them having bad explanations, no scans or them not even having that level of AE anymore, this is exactly in the same vein as my previous thread on our Regeneration page.
There’s also other small changes I’m making, mostly grammatical ones, but the biggest change of these small changes would be me changing the obligation of referencing the exact type of concept for conceptual abstractions, and making it so it's applicable with every other type of abstract existence. It doesn’t make sense to me why we would only require/heavily insinuate those with conceptual abstractions to reference the exact type of concept they embody/purely exist as, and not have say, those with informational AE reference the exact type of information manipulation they have, or just reference the fact they embody/purely exist as "information" at least.
For a more visual example of what I’m advocating, here’s Alucard’s profile, as you can see, the profile references the level of AE he possesses, which is Type 1, and the specific type he possesses, which is thoughts. Not only is this an overall more aesthetically pleasing explanation, but it also provides a little bit more context to the exact “type” these abstract characters possess. If anyone has a better way to explain this idea compared to what I’ve provided then please post it, and if it’s majority agreed upon i’ll add it to the blog.
I’ve also added examples to our Conceptual Manipulation page, which surprisingly doesn’t have either examples or a sub-sect “users” section. Which, considering the fact Conceptual Manipulation is one the largest and most important abilities we have on our wiki, is puzzling to say the least.
So here’s the blog which contains the newly changed Abstract Existence and Conceptual Manipulation examples, here’s both of our pages for both respective abilities so y’all can cross examine everything. If y’all have better examples for both pages than let me know and i’ll add them.
Voting:
Agree - @LephyrTheRevanchist, @KLOL506, @Planck69, @Theglassman12, @Dereck03, @DarkDragonMedeus
Disagree -
Neutral -
Last edited:
