• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

DarkDragonMedeus said:
I might need time to look over what was posted. And while I can see Luffy getting upset with some things you said, I think he might have misunderstood what some people have proposed as opposed to lying. I have seen plenty of people put me on one side or the other even though I was neutral or put my on neutral when I have voiced a stance and picked a side. And the same mistake has been made even though I have clarified several times. But I didn't hold it against anyone or accused someone of lying about what I agreed with.

And I agree arguing back and forth on the RVR does need to stop so staff can give a more proper analysis.
Click to expand...
If have to apply something, i want you to do it, because i have a lot of respect for you.

Furthermore, i would like to ask you to ban my account forever, because i cannot bear to be in the same place as an extremely toxic person like Omega and to avoid unnecessary fights for me it's good, i think this is enough for me

Since no one looked at Omega's offenses, i would much rather be permanently banned than stay in a place where someone has so much hate.
 
LuffyRuffy46307 said:
If have to apply something, i want you to do it, because i have a lot of respect for you.

Furthermore, i would like to ask you to ban my account forever, because i cannot bear to be in the same place as an extremely toxic person like Omega and to avoid unnecessary fights for me it's good, i think this is enough for me

Since no one looked at Omega's offenses, i would much rather be permanently banned than stay in a place where someone has so much hate.
Click to expand...
I'm sorry if I'm overstepping here (but it seems pretty important to point out) or if it's a dead topic now but I would like to point out how manipulative this is blaming Omega on how toxic he is and trying to make it out to seem like he is the problem while trying to evoke pity for himself by saying he rather be banned because of Omega's "toxicity" despite being the prime aggressor. This is pretty much gaslighting and narcissistic.
 
BestMGQScalerEver said:
I'm sorry if I'm overstepping here (but it seems pretty important to point out) or if it's a dead topic now but I would like to point out how manipulative this is blaming Omega on how toxic he is and trying to make it out to seem like he is the problem while trying to evoke pity for himself by saying he rather be banned because of Omega's "toxicity" despite being the prime aggressor. This is pretty much gaslighting and narcissistic.
Click to expand...
In your mind I'm an aggressor, but it's Omega who's being extremely toxic with his text that insulted me, I've never even dared to insult him like that, you're also not a good source to say something here, since you're often a bad person with others.

vsbattles.com

Dragon Ball Cosmology Canon

Speaking of Daizenshuu, I think it's worth mentioning that things that only appeared in anime are included in DB's Daizenshuus. Of course, but the exclusive anime things are in Daizenshuu 3 and 5 (and in the Daizenshuu 7 dictionary), but here you have Toriyama saying that the cosmology map was...
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com
 
LuffyRuffy46307 said:
In your mind I'm an aggressor, but it's Omega who's being extremely toxic with his text that insulted me, I've never even dared to insult him like that, you're also not a good source to say something here, since you're often a bad person with others.
Click to expand...
Please just stop and drop the subject, ok? If you and Omega can't get along with each other just don't speak to one another and if you still can't do that I suggest asking an admin to block each other from seeing the other's messages (an extreme measure to be sure but it's clear to me and various other users that for whatever reason there's beef and it's actually affecting DB revisions/discussions). I guess I wasn't wrong when I called the cosmology canon CRT a "crapshoot".

Personally it really shouldn't be that deep, harmless banter and facetious comments that unfortunately devolved into boundaries being crossed and now you're asking to be banned after just receiving your first official warning. Just take a small break bro, it's just online Vs debating not a court case. I've said my peace, apologies in advance if I contributed to any derailment here.
 
The_Axiom_of_Virgo said:
Please just stop and drop the subject, ok? If you and Omega can't get along with each other just don't speak to one another and if you still can't do that I suggest asking an admin to block each other from seeing the other's messages (an extreme measure to be sure but it's clear to me and various other users that for whatever reason there's beef and it's actually affecting DB revisions/discussions). I guess I wasn't wrong when I called the cosmology canon CRT a "crapshoot".

Personally it really shouldn't be that deep, harmless banter and facetious comments that unfortunately devolved into boundaries being crossed and now you're asking to be banned after just receiving your first official warning. Just take a small break bro, it's just online Vs debating not a court case. I've said my peace, apologies in advance if I contributed to any derailment here.
Click to expand...
I agree and same with the other staff that nothing beyond a light warning is fine.
 
And here we are again. Unfortunately.

Reporting @Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara for being needlessly antagonistic and insulting as a result of this thread.

She makes a pretty shady comment about the reading comprehension and literacy of her opposition (and this does confirm it's about the above thread) and she actively goes on about how the entire verse in question is exaggerated, even after being told to calm down. She also feels the need to enter threads unrelated to the CRT to remind people that she would downgrade a verse,for whatever reason.

Furthermore, on the very first thread, she showed a consistently abrasive attitude when things weren't going her way.

Now, this would be one thing if it was a first offense.

Issue is, again, Fujiwara has a consistent history of showing this kind of behavior. As you probably remember, I already reported her once for...well, the same reasons : Spiting verse supporters, aggressiveness etc... And as I pointed out last time, this isn't even the first time she gets dragged to RVR. Long story short, she's already walking on thin ice and has been already banned not too long ago.


I honestly don't get the reasoning behind this kind of attitude. With that, i rest my case.
 
Ottavio_Merluzzo said:
And here we are again. Unfortunately.

Reporting @Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara for being needlessly antagonistic and insulting as a result of this thread.

She makes a pretty shady comment about the reading comprehension and literacy of her opposition (and this does confirm it's about the above thread) and she actively goes on about how the entire verse in question is exaggerated, even after being told to calm down. She also feels the need to enter threads unrelated to the CRT to remind people that she would downgrade a verse,for whatever reason.

Furthermore, on the very first thread, she showed a consistently abrasive attitude when things weren't going her way.

Now, this would be one thing if it was a first offense.

Issue is, again, Fujiwara has a consistent history of showing this kind of behavior. As you probably remember, I already reported her once for...well, the same reasons : Spiting verse supporters, aggressiveness etc... And as I pointed out last time, this isn't even the first time she gets dragged to RVR. Long story short, she's already walking on thin ice and has been already banned not too long ago.


I honestly don't get the reasoning behind this kind of attitude. With that, i rest my case.
Click to expand...
If I may interject and add something, she also has a history of expressly antagonistic remarks and comments in Dragon Ball threads, especially towards a few supporters, as well as general brashness towards anyone who talks about upgrading the verse which is best seen in the Dragon Ball Heroes thread by @Theglassman12 and its follow-up made by Fujiwara herself.
 
Just to add some insight regarding Ottavio's report, I've directly contacted Fuji in DMs regarding the "reading comprehension being nonexistent" comment and asked her to tone it down, and she refused to listen and just say that she does this a lot on the pet peeves thread and never got reported, so take that what you will.
 
Ottavio_Merluzzo said:
And here we are again. Unfortunately.

Reporting @Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara for being needlessly antagonistic and insulting as a result of this thread.

She makes a pretty shady comment about the reading comprehension and literacy of her opposition (and this does confirm it's about the above thread) and she actively goes on about how the entire verse in question is exaggerated, even after being told to calm down. She also feels the need to enter threads unrelated to the CRT to remind people that she would downgrade a verse,for whatever reason.

Furthermore, on the very first thread, she showed a consistently abrasive attitude when things weren't going her way.

Now, this would be one thing if it was a first offense.

Issue is, again, Fujiwara has a consistent history of showing this kind of behavior. As you probably remember, I already reported her once for...well, the same reasons : Spiting verse supporters, aggressiveness etc... And as I pointed out last time, this isn't even the first time she gets dragged to RVR. Long story short, she's already walking on thin ice and has been already banned not too long ago.


I honestly don't get the reasoning behind this kind of attitude. With that, i rest my case.
Click to expand...
I cleared this up with Clover in the pet peeves thread. I said it was a general complaint I've had for many years, and the latest thread was one of many examples. That's it. I didn't call out anyone in particular (unless you want to say I insulted the entire wiki, I guess?), I was just airing a very broad grievance. Saying I'm going to downgrade a verse is also... not a rule violation? Like, I'll admit to it here, I would like to downgrade God of War because I think some things are wrong.

I'd also like to point out that the issue of media literacy was brought up in the thread itself and nobody seemed to have an issue with that.

Bringing up Dragon Ball is also poisoning the well a bit here, since that issue has since been resolved with a 2 week ban.
 
Ottavio_Merluzzo said:
And here we are again. Unfortunately.

Reporting @Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara for being needlessly antagonistic and insulting as a result of this thread.

She makes a pretty shady comment about the reading comprehension and literacy of her opposition (and this does confirm it's about the above thread) and she actively goes on about how the entire verse in question is exaggerated, even after being told to calm down. She also feels the need to enter threads unrelated to the CRT to remind people that she would downgrade a verse,for whatever reason.

Furthermore, on the very first thread, she showed a consistently abrasive attitude when things weren't going her way.

Now, this would be one thing if it was a first offense.

Issue is, again, Fujiwara has a consistent history of showing this kind of behavior. As you probably remember, I already reported her once for...well, the same reasons : Spiting verse supporters, aggressiveness etc... And as I pointed out last time, this isn't even the first time she gets dragged to RVR. Long story short, she's already walking on thin ice and has been already banned not too long ago.


I honestly don't get the reasoning behind this kind of attitude. With that, i rest my case.
Click to expand...
I'm going to be honest here, I think you're blowing things out of proportion. Yes, her speech and language she uses can be very blunt or harsh, but this is on an entirely separate thread, which is basically used to vent frustrations. Her messages were not targeted towards anyone, and I feel as if you're just looking for excuses to get her another warn or ban when, in reality, she's still in line, just a bit heated.

Treating this as "walking on thin ice" as well is also kind of stupid because she's been on good behavior, so once again, I think you're just reaching for straws when pretty much everyone has their moments and gets frustrated a bit. Not like she was actively targeting people.
 
My feelings are the same as Curry's. She vented her frustrations on a thread meant for such a purpose, she did not direct it at anyone in particular, and what she said was not overboard in any case.

Also, despite what the report said, Fuji did not "confirm" that it was about the recent CRT. Oddly, that claim links to a comment which does precisely the opposite of that.
 
Theglassman12 said:
Just to add some insight regarding Ottavio's report, I've directly contacted Fuji in DMs regarding the "reading comprehension being nonexistent" comment and asked her to tone it down, and she refused to listen and just say that she does this a lot on the pet peeves thread and never got reported, so take that what you will.
Click to expand...
I won't get too involved with this, but going by what's been brought up, I think this is especially noteworthy - as this is tantamount to ignoring staff warnings (not the formal warnings, no) about her conduct.
 
If a DM conversation is to be used as evidence, then the content of the messages should be provided in their entirety. I don't see the aforementioned comment as being an issue, so if all she did was disagree on the matter, or pointed out that precedence suggests it's acceptable, then it would be quite a stretch to characterize it as ignoring a staff warning.
 
I didn't realize it was the pet peeve thread, but at the same time, even that has a rule against "Going overboard". Based on how Ottavio's report was organized, it gave the impression she said those words on the God of War thread; which would have been a much bigger deal if that was the case. But she has behaved better mostly since her 2 week ban and also mentioned wanting to wait before attempting to downgrade anything Dragon Ball related out of respect for Akira Toriyama.

But anyway, I suppose I might have overreacted and now more neutral but leaning towards letting her have a chance. It really depends on the interpretation of "Overboard" is the main thing.
 
Deagonx said:
My feelings are the same as Curry's. She vented her frustrations on a thread meant for such a purpose, she did not direct it at anyone in particular, and what she said was not overboard in any case.

Also, despite what the report said, Fuji did not "confirm" that it was about the recent CRT. Oddly, that claim links to a comment which does precisely the opposite of that.
Click to expand...
I just said media literacy is nonexistent on this site. That's a very general complaint that I've had for years, and this latest thread is just one of many examples (which is why I brought it up).
Click to expand...

Yes, this was brought up directly because of the recent CRT. Like, objectively speaking.
 
384D059A-567F-49DE-9CD7-518A7DC861C8.jpg


A1063CCD-02EE-4A43-A003-C0E692B97B40.jpg

8C05E199-2782-4B19-9EEC-B4CE1A68F91C.jpg
I told her to tone it down with her comment about reading comprehension being nonexistent on the site and she just refused despite the fact that she's had 9 warnings and a ban prior to this.
 
I don't think a ban is needed but in no way do I think that comment was okay regardless of if it was on the pet peevs thread, especially as a person who has reading issues. That comment didn't need to be directed at a person when we know it's caused by a thread or threads which consists of individuals. Once again, that's my opinion but I definitely don't think a ban is needed.
 
I'm fine with simply affirming a broader collective staff judgment that such comments, even if unspecific, are too inflammatory for the forum. I don't think any action further than that would be justified given the inconsistent messaging on these sorts of things.
 
Dark_Soul20189 said:
If i may share my opinion on this matter, A ban seems much to harsh. Fujiwara behavior in the latest thread was resanable.... Having to debate over 10 pages for what seems to be "possibly Biological manipulation" at best would make anyone act out a bit. To make it even worse, it was only 3 real arguments for why it should stay that was repeated over and over again.

So i don't believe any such strict action as a ban or even a strict warning is deserved in this case.
Click to expand...
Would be more appreciative if you had a stake in the conversation.
 
CloverDragon03 said:
I think some level of action should be taken. If not a ban, definitely a warning.

Edit: Though if she has 9 warnings as Glass mentioned, things get a little different imo
Click to expand...
Yeah, I second this. I'm alright with whatever action is decided to be taken by the collective staff but having 9 warnings, many of which are presumably of similar instances, should be taken into account.
 
The_Axiom_of_Virgo said:
Please just stop and drop the subject, ok? If you and Omega can't get along with each other just don't speak to one another and if you still can't do that I suggest asking an admin to block each other from seeing the other's messages (an extreme measure to be sure but it's clear to me and various other users that for whatever reason there's beef and it's actually affecting DB revisions/discussions). I guess I wasn't wrong when I called the cosmology canon CRT a "crapshoot".

Personally it really shouldn't be that deep, harmless banter and facetious comments that unfortunately devolved into boundaries being crossed and now you're asking to be banned after just receiving your first official warning. Just take a small break bro, it's just online Vs debating not a court case. I've said my peace, apologies in advance if I contributed to any derailment here.
Click to expand...
DarkDragonMedeus said:
I agree and same with the other staff that nothing beyond a light warning is fine.
Click to expand...
I agree with Medeus.

@LuffyRuffy46307 @omegabronic

Is it acceptable if I prevent both of you from seeing each other's posts in this forum?
 
Theglassman12 said:
I'm fine with either a ban or a warning, though the 9 previous reports Fuji has should be some sign that this can't be tolerated any longer, especially if she acts up again which just shows she's not learned anything from her 2 week ban.
Click to expand...
i do think 4 prior warnings on the tracker + more informal ones that aren't on there + being right off the heels of a previous 2 week ban for a similar reason should be taken into consideration, yeah
 
CurrySenpai said:
I'm going to be honest here, I think you're blowing things out of proportion. Yes, her speech and language she uses can be very blunt or harsh, but this is on an entirely separate thread, which is basically used to vent frustrations. Her messages were not targeted towards anyone, and I feel as if you're just looking for excuses to get her another warn or ban when, in reality, she's still in line, just a bit heated.

Treating this as "walking on thin ice" as well is also kind of stupid because she's been on good behavior, so once again, I think you're just reaching for straws when pretty much everyone has their moments and gets frustrated a bit. Not like she was actively targeting people.
Click to expand...
Regarding the Fujiwara situation (since I missed it when it was initially brought up): I am largely in agreement with Curry, although Fujiwara does need to cease the use of various other threads to slander others she doesn't like. It is and has been a problem for some time.
 
CloverDragon03 said:
Personally I'm not a fan of Curry's response, especially the accusations that Ottavio is trying to get Fuji warned/banned. The fact of the matter is that this has been a repeated problem, as has been pointed out, and it's very reductive to paint this as such.
Click to expand...
I don't think Fuji should be free from punishment, in fact, I think a final warning before a much longer than 2 week ban for a potential next offense would be the best bet here.

My personal advice would be to vent frustrations in private, whether that be in the dms of a trusted friend or a discord server. Obviously, we all have moments where we slip up and get frustrated, but it should be avoided, especially considering there's a delete feature for your own messages. Just taking a step back and going "Is this really necessary and will saying this get me in trouble." is always good to do, especially on a site focused on debating like this one.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Antvasima
  • Sticky
Wiki Vandalism Reports
37 38 39
Replies
2K
Views
113K
Dereck03
Dereck03
Lloydblitzed
  • Locked
Discussion Rules lil Revision
Replies
39
Views
3K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Antvasima
  • Sticky
  • Featured
Extremely important announcements for our community
Replies
31
Views
6K
Agnaa
Agnaa
  • Locked
Clarification Of Sentence Phrasings And Addition Of Expected Punishments For Each Type Of Rule Breach For All Rules Pages
Replies
21
Views
2K
Mahek_The_Assassin_Silent_Killer
AThe1412
Can you restrict a character's Standard Equipment if it gives them a different tier?
Replies
2
Views
711
TheGreatJedi13
TheGreatJedi13
Back
Top