• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

Hi! I'd like to report user @Veronica for consistent antagonistic and condescending remarks in dragon ball threads both against individual users (the one quoted below in particular aimed at me) and the fandom in general as well. She has consistently make such vitriolic and disparaging remarks despite being told off multiple times by staff such as @Damage3245 to drop it, which also include cluttering and derailing threads by peddling her own personal interpretation and rules for Dragon Ball scaling that the wiki has consistently rejected over and over (and thread banned her for as well)

On that note I should also add that this user has been reported and banned in multiple DB threads before for the exact same reason including but not limited to making threads that were against the rules as well. This user refuses to heed any warnings from staff.

If needed I can include more evidence and examples of this continued behavior as well from many different dragon ball threads.

You go against all the in verse evidence for your head-canon and hyper-wank Interpretation. I already debunked your wank that base is SSG during Future Trunks arc with Beerus statement. Also that character X always scales to B at full power, even if they made a tiny stratch. It's sad honesty, how desperate you arem
 
Last edited:
Hi! I'd like to report user @Veronica for consistent antagonistic and condescending remarks in dragon ball threads both against individual users (the one quoted below in particular aimed at me) and the fandom in general as well. She has consistently make such vitriolic and disparaging remarks despite being told off multiple times by staff such as @Damage3245 to drop it, which also include cluttering and derailing threads by peddling her own personal interpretation and rules for Dragon Ball scaling that the wiki has consistently rejected over and over (and thread banned her for as well)

On that note I should also add that this user has been reported and banned in multiple DB threads before for the exact same reason including but not limited to making threads that were against the rules as well. This user refuses to heed any warnings from staff.

If needed I can include more evidence and examples of this continued behavior as well from many different dragon ball threads.
I would also like to add this, someone has to fix her, she is always sending spam in the general discussion and among others (it's all about the argument of Goku absorbing the God form for base), we're all tired of telling her to stop, but it never happens

 
I would also like to add this, someone has to fix her, she is always sending spam in the general discussion and among others (it's all about the argument of Goku absorbing the God form for base), we're all tired of telling her to stop, but it never happens
I didn't it bring it up for months. So keep the "spamming" nonsense accusations away.
 
Serious? You made more than 5 crt on the subject in the past, Dragon Ball has been filling up super general discussion on the same subject, we have already asked you to stop that.
That was around a year ago. If you think talking about it again in that timeframe is spam. Than by definition your comment is spamm and should be reported.
 
Hi! I'd like to report user @Veronica for consistent antagonistic and condescending remarks in dragon ball threads both against individual users (the one quoted below in particular aimed at me) and the fandom in general as well. She has consistently make such vitriolic and disparaging remarks despite being told off multiple times by staff such as @Damage3245 to drop it, which also include cluttering and derailing threads by peddling her own personal interpretation and rules for Dragon Ball scaling that the wiki has consistently rejected over and over (and thread banned her for as well)

On that note I should also add that this user has been reported and banned in multiple DB threads before for the exact same reason including but not limited to making threads that were against the rules as well. This user refuses to heed any warnings from staff.

If needed I can include more evidence and examples of this continued behavior as well from many different dragon ball threads.
This aggression is not entirely one-sided, so whether she is deserving of a warning is difficult to tell (or, indeed, if other parties may deserve one). She is aggressive, yes, but notably the "stop whining" comment came after a comment against her that wasn't exactly kind or fruitful.

If you have a great deal of recent evidence, then yes, you should probably show it to the class for proper consideration.
 
Hi! I'd like to report user @Veronica for consistent antagonistic and condescending remarks in dragon ball threads both against individual users (the one quoted below in particular aimed at me) and the fandom in general as well. She has consistently make such vitriolic and disparaging remarks despite being told off multiple times by staff such as @Damage3245 to drop it, which also include cluttering and derailing threads by peddling her own personal interpretation and rules for Dragon Ball scaling that the wiki has consistently rejected over and over (and thread banned her for as well)

On that note I should also add that this user has been reported and banned in multiple DB threads before for the exact same reason including but not limited to making threads that were against the rules as well. This user refuses to heed any warnings from staff.

If needed I can include more evidence and examples of this continued behavior as well from many different dragon ball threads.
I agree that she is persistently pesky on nearly every Dragon Ball related thread she seems to partake in. And seems to consistently dodge the bullet on nearly every Dragon Ball specific discussion rule. While she's not the most hostile person ever, she tends to get quite obnoxious about the whole Goku Vs Beerus feat and ignores the very basic face value evidence. And has a history of seeming feigning ignorance and a tendency to be oblivious for what she did wrong. Even to the point where she has been topic banned before and made a thread during a topic ban thus basically alluding her own topic ban.

While I don't think she needs another ban at least not right away, a final warning to stop seems reasonable.
 
I agree that she is persistently pesky on nearly every Dragon Ball related thread she seems to partake in. And seems to consistently dodge the bullet on nearly every Dragon Ball specific discussion rule. While she's not the most hostile person ever, she tends to get quite obnoxious about the whole Goku Vs Beerus feat and ignores the very basic face value evidence. And has a history of seeming feigning ignorance and a tendency to be oblivious for what she did wrong. Even to the point where she has been topic banned before and made a thread during a topic ban thus basically alluding her own topic ban.

While I don't think she needs another ban at least not right away, a final warning to stop seems reasonable.
I'll note that Veronica does not have any warnings on our tracker. This would be her first.
 
I agree that she is persistently pesky on nearly every Dragon Ball related thread she seems to partake in. And seems to consistently dodge the bullet on nearly every Dragon Ball specific discussion rule. While she's not the most hostile person ever, she tends to get quite obnoxious about the whole Goku Vs Beerus feat and ignores the very basic face value evidence. And has a history of seeming feigning ignorance and a tendency to be oblivious for what she did wrong. Even to the point where she has been topic banned before and made a thread during a topic ban thus basically alluding her own topic ban.

While I don't think she needs another ban at least not right away, a final warning to stop seems reasonable.
All of that got refuted. Monaka Beerus vs Goku is SBG concept being used from RoF, being a writing mistake like the copy-Vegeta as both are filler and contradicting U6 arc. So it isn't a coincidence. Also refute my explanation. Btw you can call me "ignorant and obnoxious" but saying" whiny" goes to far?!

Which is quite ironic, since you are the one that believes U6 SSJ3 Goku would be 400x SSG. Which is completely false and ignorant. When SSB is only described as 50x SSG. Yet, you magically make SSB 10 million times SSG.
 
Last edited:
I'll note that Veronica does not have any warnings on our tracker. This would be her first.
The best evidence for the behavior and the one DDM mentioned is right here in front of you

All of that got refuted. Monaka Beerus vs Goku is SBG concept being used from RoF, being a writing mistake like the copy-Vegeta as both are filler and contradicting U6 arc. So it isn't a coincidence. Also refute my explanation. Btw you can call me "ignorant and obnoxious" but saying" whiny" goes to far?!

Which is quite ironic, since you are the one that believes U6 SSJ3 Goku would be 400x SSG. Which is completely false and ignorant. When SSB is only described as 50x SSG. Yet, you magically make SSB 10 million times SSG.
Though if insufficient I’ll post more soon
 
Damage already made a small step towards my way. Showing I'm factualy right
Not my point. You've been repeatedly been condescending, antagonistic, and overall super insistent on having your way no matter what in Damage's thread. You've been asked to stop repeatedly, including twice by Damage, and you've ignored such things every time. This behavior's gotten you banned from discussing Dragon Ball before, and you haven't changed it at all.
 
Not my point. You've been repeatedly been condescending, antagonistic, and overall super insistent on having your way no matter what in Damage's thread. You've been asked to stop repeatedly, including twice by Damage, and you've ignored such things every time. This behavior's gotten you banned from discussing Dragon Ball before, and you haven't changed it at all.
I make only remarks towards arguments not the person, which isn't a fallacy. The thread showed my insistent is right though. Also I got banned not because of my "behavior" but because is was a closet subject from what I remember. I could be wrong.
 
I'll note that Veronica does not have any warnings on our tracker. This would be her first.
As one of the staff that participated on the discussion rule added because of her and her subsequent topic ban, this is because her issues were ignored for a time until it was decided to directly topic ban without warning after enough evidence of her continued derailment and spam were shown.
 
As one of the staff that participated on the discussion rule added because of her and her subsequent topic ban, this is because her issues were ignored for a time until it was decided to directly topic ban without warning after enough evidence of her continued derailment and spam were shown.
Aye, this had been mentioned afterwards. Without the further evidence being brought in from then to now, though, I'd still be opposed to anything more than a bog standard warning.
 
As one of the staff that participated on the discussion rule added because of her and her subsequent topic ban, this is because her issues were ignored for a time until it was decided to directly topic ban without warning after enough evidence of her continued derailment and spam were shown.
I and many others have never "Ignored her" per say, but all of her issues were based solely on knit picks, Goku and Vegeta getting stronger as the series progresses is the most face value fact about what Dragon Ball is all about. And there's too much over reliance on something that was completely retconned. There never was such a form called "Saiyan Beyond God" and was at best a title for someone who could showcase Cosmic levels of power never thought seen without a SSG form, but able to input the same level of power in their base forms. And Goku and Vegeta having their base forms surpass how strong SSG/SSB forms were previously also happens multiple times hence the stacked up power scaling chains. And the only argument she can basically ever give is "They are not SSG tier because I said so." That's exactly why people have issues with her.
 
Aye, this had been mentioned afterwards. Without the further evidence being brought in from then to now, though, I'd still be opposed to anything more than a bog standard warning.
Is it allowed to post memes of victory? Also my pronounce are hir/hirs
 
Is anyone in contact with Topaz who can attest to her emotional state since making the comment? A verdict can be reached either way, but I think it is a relevant extenuating factor. The comment was not acceptable by any standard, but I believe it was also a product of a lapse of judgement at a very unstable time. This doesn't excuse it, or make it 'better', but it does reframe how I'd approach handling it. I don't think it would do her, or the site, or the community at large any benefit to pursue a ban if she has calmed down since then and can rejoin discussions.
Bump
 
People are distorting my crt with random things, could you delete the unnecessary things please
 
People are distorting my crt with random things, could you delete the unnecessary things please
no one is doing that. people are countering your arguments. aside from 1 or 2 posts, no one has been derailing and has been on topic for the thread.
 
Of course
 
Of course
no one is doing that. people are countering your arguments. aside from 1 or 2 posts, no one has been derailing and has been on topic for the thread.
and lets not forget that was something that you started yourself
 
I was shown this by I was shown this by users who thought it was suspicious so I wanted to bring it up preemptively but a user is very very likely using exploits to try and justify an upgrade.

Essentially what stuck out to them was the fact that one Arthur Morgan with no boost somehow survived a point blank dynamite explosion something they and myself knew is always an instant kill but moreso the fact thay strangely for the first half of the clip the calcer stands still not moving for about almost the full first 30 seconds of the video prior to doing something already normally impossible in the game.

@Chariot190 has also wrote him on his wall asking about the clip inquiring about how he survived this to verify the validity of him trying to justify durability scaling for the calc.

For context here Arthur Morgan is instant killed by even a single dynamite stick under normal circumstances without the consumption of health tonics which essentially act as a multiplier for his health and fortitude in the game. Their activation is easily discernable by Arthur's health having a golden ring around the heart in the corner, something which is clearly missing from the video in the calc. Worst is that just using a tonic isn't an end all be all to your survival either, see here in these 3 videos.

This is no tonic, level one tonic, and level two tonic.

You'd need 2 full layers of amps from tonics to even remotely survive what he survives in the clip as even with level 1 tonics you still instantly die and even then with level 2 it leaves Arthur near death as you can see. Now this would normally be something I'd treat as them just happening upon a staged video but what's bad is that this new user does this as their first and only calc with the video being uploaded right alongside the same time as the blogs creation and posting on a Youtube channel with no videos prior to this one, that is to say the coincidence of just happen to find this exploited gameplay that was posted right alongside the time of the creation of the blog and using it for the basis of the calc seems just to convenient to be coincidence I think.

That all coupled with the strange clip with him waiting for a while as if he was doing something else in the background, it just all feels a bit off to me after being shown it for myself.
 
I was shown this by I was shown this by users who thought it was suspicious so I wanted to bring it up preemptively but a user is very very likely using exploits to try and justify an upgrade.

Essentially what stuck out to them was the fact that one Arthur Morgan with no boost somehow survived a point blank dynamite explosion something they and myself knew is always an instant kill but moreso the fact thay strangely for the first half of the clip the calcer stands still not moving for about almost the full first 30 seconds of the video prior to doing something already normally impossible in the game.

@Chariot190 has also wrote him on his wall asking about the clip inquiring about how he survived this to verify the validity of him trying to justify durability scaling for the calc.

For context here Arthur Morgan is instant killed by even a single dynamite stick under normal circumstances without the consumption of health tonics which essentially act as a multiplier for his health and fortitude in the game. Their activation is easily discernable by Arthur's health having a golden ring around the heart in the corner, something which is clearly missing from the video in the calc. Worst is that just using a tonic isn't an end all be all to your survival either, see here in these 3 videos.

This is no tonic, level one tonic, and level two tonic.

You'd need 2 full layers of amps from tonics to even remotely survive what he survives in the clip as even with level 1 tonics you still instantly die and even then with level 2 it leaves Arthur near death as you can see. Now this would normally be something I'd treat as them just happening upon a staged video but what's bad is that this new user does this as their first and only calc with the video being uploaded right alongside the same time as the blogs creation and posting on a Youtube channel with no videos prior to this one, that is to say the coincidence of just happen to find this exploited gameplay that was posted right alongside the time of the creation of the blog and using it for the basis of the calc seems just to convenient to be coincidence I think.

That all coupled with the strange clip with him waiting for a while as if he was doing something else in the background, it just all feels a bit off to me after being shown it for myself.
I’m not gonna lie, based off the proof this is clearly cheating/exploiting. If this is their first calc / contribution and it’s something meant to falsify statistics through what could normally be overlooked I say permaban, this is extremely deceptive, beyond what’s normally seen, imo.
 
Gonna be honest, the only thing I can think of at the moment is that the user hacked the game in some way to make Arthur invulnerable to damage. I don't want to jump to conclusions immediately, but considering also the fact that this is a new user and this is their only major contribution, it seems quite likely. If that's the case, I'd permaban them, as this is very deceptive behavior done in an attempt to upgrade the verse.
 
Ped is being a nuisance. The conversation otherwise isn't fully restrained but he is intentionally egging it on. Should be warned, as he's been lightly warned before but never added to the tracker.
Light warning seems fine for now.
I’m not gonna lie, based off the proof this is clearly cheating/exploiting. If this is their first calc / contribution and it’s something meant to falsify statistics through what could normally be overlooked I say permaban, this is extremely deceptive, beyond what’s normally seen, imo.
Calculation Manipulation is indeed a serious offense if that is what's going on. I mostly skimmed and currently tied up with notification swarm to read up full context. Though based on Dalesean and Clover's reaction. It seems a permaban is indeed agreed.
 
I agree that this is an instance of at least untruthfulness, but I'm curious if this is an exploit in the game or outright hacking: the latter would constitute a far more severe level of untruthfulness, in my view, and would indeed support an instant, permanent ban. Otherwise, I think the punishment should be lighter as a very strong first warning: perhaps a ban spanning several months, instead.
 
Back
Top