Wait, I'm just basing this on the response to the warning, but are PartialPriority54 and @OptimisticCynic the same person?
Was 2 slow
Wrong thread
All purpose thread instead, also that's not worth a thread deletion, a close is enough.
I meant to close but used the word delete, apologies for the confusion my bad but thank you for redirecting me.
And now, PartialPriority54, who is evidently @OptimisticCynic after all, has once again (half-assedly) reapplied changes to profiles linking a CRT that has literally zero input. I've again reverted it. The user in question (again) additionally made scaling adjustments that were not included in the CRT's proposals.
..What role is required for that?
Admin or Bureaucrats.
They cannot. Dereck just has admin rights for convenience without actually being a full admin.
The Content Moderators that can only do that are Temporary Administrators.
You may not have noticed, but we both have the role of administrator on the wiki, tho I had to ask Ant for permission to be able to block vandals.
I am aware, but yeah, I only have this to be able to clean-up more efficiently.
You should bring proof of what you claim. Any threads links?
I will give them but on "Chara vs Mario" "Asriel Dreemurr vs Kirby" "Golden Frieza vs Sans" are the worst ones
I mean, I'll apologize and even take some of the blame, but you've done this:
Like, I can admit that I've been a tad immature my self, and I should have just ignored your childish behavior, but you can't say you haven't done that as well..Most game mechanics are canon on UT educate yourself on the verse please
In turn, Cynic played dumb and continued to speak to me as if PartialPriority54 was an unrelated third party. Saying this, I quote:
Which, aside from Cynic's clear awareness of what he was doing and lack of self-reflection, somewhat strikes me as a mock attempt.
Thank you. But, while I don't mean to stick my nose into staff business, banning users without giving them a chance to defend themselves doesn't sit right with me. A year-long ban is also excessive in my opinion; Cynic genuinely wanted to help out. I don't think his acts were driven by malice enough to warrant a whole year.
Wasn't entirely confident on an exact ban length, but according to the report he got multiple warnings and was doing this for 3 months straight. The "No chance to defend himself" sounds like an astute accusation and simply the opposite of what the report said. If they been doing so for a long time, a ban would need to be quite lengthy in general.
Also, do not ever try to thread ban me when you're literally the one obsessed with UT ( look at your pfp for example ) and even when I vote for the contrary I don't brag about it and I try to see the reasons from both sides.
That was not in any of my reports, no. It was added by @TheMonkeMan after the third report, which isn’t particularly wrong. Cynic was ignoring warnings and applying things for a while, but saying 3 months straight is a bit of an exaggeration, I’d say.
Please don’t take this elsewhere; I’m not accusing anybody in any capacity; it just feels unfair that Cynic was banned for a year as a result of my report without his knowledge.
A ban definitely should be given, I personally cannot accept any other conclusion, though again, I have no say in this.
Sorry, but I think that I saw them get about 3/4 reports from November to now.
Cynic did get a warning from Antvasima in November; afterwards, he stopped for a while, but like I said, that doesn't excuse his actions in my opinion. I've made several points, excluding that, where he was being dishonest even.
Thank you again.
Yes, thank you. We've handled that matter starting with this post.
