Nothing Thor has done would limit him and all the statements for the other gods would serve as nothing but hype themselves. Unlike Thor’s statements which refer to actual events and feats in the history of the verse, the others have no such backing. Heimdall saying he can bust worlds doesn’t mean much when you are trying to dismiss the statements he made for Thor and Lu Bu being the strongest. You can’t have your cake and eat it. And if you really want to talk about feats, all the other gods so far are being harmed by Divine Weapons while Thor would break the strongest Divine Weapon with a swing.
Zeus being stated to be omniscient and omnipotent doesn’t work since during the first fight, the narrator even calls the gods
supposedly omniscient which shows the statement is wrong. If you want to say that it doesn’t go against the omnipotent part, Zeus got his face kicked in by AdamRuling something doesn’t mean you scale above everything in it nor does it imply you rule by virtue of strength. Even when
Zeus threatens everyone to stop fighting in Chapter 34, all of them are still ready to go until
Odin makes them **** down instantly.
You completely ignored the actual information in favour of the hype text. It not being from a character only lends more support to its accuracy, not diminish its credibility as the characters have been repeatedly shown as fallible sources of information. Killing a bear refers to him being strong even in his childhood, dying of boredom refers to what happened in his past where he didn’t give a shit about anything and let himself be killed because nothing could challenge him anymore. If you really want to bring up the point of highlighting words, why not mention the fact that harming the strongest among the gods is highlighted.
Long story shorter, you ignore Thor and Lu Bu’s statements because they are “hype” in favour of their feats but proceed to compare it to the completely vacuous and unfounded hype statements of the other gods. You present these as fact but don’t bother to mention that all of the statements that mean something are all contradicted or come from a fallible source. In comparison, the statements I presented are not “contradicted” by anything but your statement which has been proven false by other scans independent of my own. You even bring attention to the headings of my scan rather than the non-hype information all while blatantly ignoring context of said information, and the narrative.
On the Shiva vs Rudra, anyone have any idea how to calc it? My initial thought was that they dispersed the clouds with the shock wave but later on it starts raining so I’m not too sure on that. It does say that the rain was their sweat that flowed so maybe they created the rain clouds? Does keep with Rudra being the tempest, though that is a windy storm rather than rain. Rn all I got is their fight was loud enough to be heard throughout all of India so the decibels should be pretty high.