Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Looking through the profiles, it seems like there was some kind of speed revision that wasn't applied to the needed profiles or something, and as a result the Speed ratings look to be all over the placeRakudai Kishi no Cavalry
A quick browsing shows that the pages lack scans for most powers, but everything else is in good state from a glance
Speed: Massively Hypersonic (1/20th of his Ittou Shura speed)
Speed: High Hypersonic (Comparable to Ikki)
I think I was too late but I've read the vast bulk of Xeelee works albeit it was quite a while ago.I agree. Aca 5 without an explanation is a big no no but maybe we can just remove the ones that dont have any justification and leave the rest?
@Celestial_Pegasus @Starter_Pack @Ionliosite @Zencha9 @Firephoenixearl @AshMcXuelan23Rakudai Kishi no Cavalry
A quick browsing shows that the pages lack scans for most powers, but everything else is in good state from a glance, I'd like other thoughts on this case as it's a dead verse from what I've heard, and it seems no one is interested lately on raising the quality of the pages.
Well it lacks scans, lacks consistency, and lacks references. The main supporters have also since left.Wait, why removing this work? It is still plenty hard work from people. The issue can be solved to add references or scans, but not direct deletion?
Actual respect that the profiles are still outstanding, and specially MC with his formatting.
But it is nowhere a dead verse, it is pretty famous series. And even if its dead, you can't simply delete every dead verse that has been heavily worked on.
It is the same argument, that verses that has no longer continued should be deleted.
Okay, that doesn't change our guidelines which require scans, references, and consistency between profiles.Because it was created prior to the new reference obligation rule.
Unless you think we need to delete every verse priorly to the new rule, you are destroying the fandom by that.
The verse is pretty much known and popular, the work is definitely not cheap, and it was invested significantly.
If pages do not have references, they need to be updated to fit our current standards, otherwise they are candidates for deletion.No, there is absolutely no rule to remove every verse before the creation of new reference guideline because it lacks references.
By that you are removing half of profiles simply of this argument.
Also, which consistency are you talking about? The verse pretty much holds a good balance in consistency, I only see lacking references, but otherwise the profiles are actually outstanding and created very well.
We actually said we apply reference / scan requirements only to new pages, as it can't be expected that thousands of profiles get updated with references within any reasonable timeframe and we don't want to destroy years of accepted wiki content based on new standards. (That's why the editing rules state "New pages without that section may be deleted" not just any pages)If pages do not have references, they need to be updated to fit our current standards, otherwise they are candidates for deletion.
Not only do these pages lack refs, they lack scans, and the statistics aren't even correct.
I don't know what pages you're looking at but the only Rakudai page with any effort put into it is Ikki, and even he has a severe lack of scans and no references.
So, not seeing what you're getting at here. If you're not going to update them, then stop suggesting that we keep blatantly lackluster pages.
I don't know why you're pretending as if they are just missing references.There is absolutely no evidence that the rule is for all profiles, Agnaa made it specifically clear that future profiles are “must stick” to the obligation while older profiles are preferred to be re-worked on (and have exceptions)
The verse pretty much only lacks references, and some calculation needs to be updated after new policies exists.
But there is no reason to delete it fully. And your argument simply is “We delete every profile in fandom for lacking references” is a bit ignorant for even not acknowledging how much time investment people have done while creating profiles to prior rules.
So you want to save the Page's code in sandbox before deletion? Should be fine tho.I mean, if I'm allowed to copy-paste the pages' code before, I personally don't mind them get deleted. It'll take way too long to get 12 books worth of scans and references for something like this when most people who like the verse aren't even in the site anymore (even I have become mostly lurker by now).
Any updates on this?I mean, if I'm allowed to copy-paste the pages' code before, I personally don't mind them get deleted. It'll take way too long to get 12 books worth of scans and references for something like this when most people who like the verse aren't even in the site anymore (even I have become mostly lurker by now).
I mean, if you fix the speed thing that was mentioned they would be allowed to stay even without references. But do as you prefer.I mean, if I'm allowed to copy-paste the pages' code before, I personally don't mind them get deleted. It'll take way too long to get 12 books worth of scans and references for something like this when most people who like the verse aren't even in the site anymore (even I have become mostly lurker by now).
Is it possible for this verse to be un-deleted?.speaking of a verse that lacks supporters....
Hoshin Engi
Hoshin Engi (Japanese: 封神演義 Hepburn: Hōshin Engi?), also known as Soul Hunter, is a Japanese manga series by Ryu Fujisaki. Hoshin Engiwas inspired by the Chinese literary classic Fengshen Yanyi, a shenmonovel (in fact, Houshin Engi is just the Japanese pronunciation of it). The story involves...vsbattles.fandom.com
Well it can be undeleted with the help of staffIs it possible for this verse to be un-deleted?.
I'm planning on revising it in the near future and having the foundation of those profiles would be very helpful for that process.
I literally said you're free to delete them soAny updates on this?
The verse is pretty bare bones, but I don't mind giving you the codes of the deleted pages later.Is it possible for this verse to be un-deleted?.
I'm planning on revising it in the near future and having the foundation of those profiles would be very helpful for that process.
If you point out which one, I will fix it in this weekend.I mean, if you fix the speed thing that was mentioned they would be allowed to stay even without references. But do as you prefer.
Oh... F I am late.Agreed, deleted.
I wasn't talking about the verse Dereck is talking about.Oh... F I am late.
Bambu. Could you delete this?I wasn't talking about the verse Dereck is talking about.