• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Um...


 
Um...


From a quick glance, this was proposed and accepted in this thread, but I haven't checked if the uploaded page matched what was agreed upon.
 
I propose to delete this profile for the following reasons:

"After careful consideration, I think the Ice Dragons profile should be removed.
Since their existence is unproven (for the moment), the powers and abilities mentioned are also just sailors stories, and there is nothing to say that this is also true."

And the profile creator agrees with it if it's accepted (said in the same link above)
 
I propose to delete this profile for the following reasons:

"After careful consideration, I think the Ice Dragons profile should be removed.
Since their existence is unproven (for the moment), the powers and abilities mentioned are also just sailors stories, and there is nothing to say that this is also true."

And the profile creator agrees with it if it's accepted (said in the same link above)
Nuked
 
Many stats lack solid reasoning, no scans overall some of the stuff also doesn't follow established ratings like Intelligence being labelled Sub-Human
@Apex_Predator_GX, @Kiryu-MG3 , @EnnardTrap1987 and @Vizer04 can further comment on if they want to revise this pages to begin with
Also I should note that the verse page is structured kinda weirdly and doesn't really align with other pages so might want to change it
 
Many stats lack solid reasoning, no scans overall some of the stuff also doesn't follow established ratings like Intelligence being labelled Sub-Human
@Apex_Predator_GX, @Kiryu-MG3 , @EnnardTrap1987 and @Vizer04 can further comment on if they want to revise this pages to begin with
Also I should note that the verse page is structured kinda weirdly and doesn't really align with other pages so might want to change it
If they are that bad, then will be better nuke them. Unfortunately I'm not so knowledgeable in those Silent Hills.

I'm gonna see what I can do for the verse page later...
 
Yeah SH is unfortunately in a bad spot, and not many people are gonna revise it since most of the later games (which likely contain more feats) are not well liked.

I can probably quickly touch up the Bubble Head Nurse, scale her to the SH2 MC, since Silent Hill 2 is the one I've played.
 
I propose to delete this profile for the following reasons:

"After careful consideration, I think the Ice Dragons profile should be removed.
Since their existence is unproven (for the moment), the powers and abilities mentioned are also just sailors stories, and there is nothing to say that this is also true."

And the profile creator agrees with it if it's accepted (said in the same link above)
So, about this...
 
Also, thank you to everybody who are helping out here.
 
Thank you for the help.
 
Many stats lack solid reasoning, no scans overall some of the stuff also doesn't follow established ratings like Intelligence being labelled Sub-Human
@Apex_Predator_GX, @Kiryu-MG3 , @EnnardTrap1987 and @Vizer04 can further comment on if they want to revise this pages to begin with
Also I should note that the verse page is structured kinda weirdly and doesn't really align with other pages so might want to change it
I was kinda planning on doing something with Silent Hill on this wiki, but that may take some time.
 
So what do the rest of you think about the SIlent Hill pages that Tllmbrg linked to? Should they be deleted?
 
I was kinda planning on doing something with Silent Hill on this wiki, but that may take some time.
Do tell me if you need any help with calculations and the like, I have only played one game but I'd still like to contribute since I really liked it.
 
I know there is major 40k revisions planned for the future, these profiles just make me sad/mad.

Zero scans/justifications/poor reasonings. Just old 2017 era profiles that make the verse look worse then it needs too, I also doubt that anyone is going to remake/fix them for an extremely long time as well.








I genuinely think the only one worth keeping potentially is


because he can be fixed fairly easily.
 
I know there is major 40k revisions planned for the future, these profiles just make me sad/mad.

Zero scans/justifications/poor reasonings. Just old 2017 era profiles that make the verse look worse then it needs too, I also doubt that anyone is going to remake/fix them for an extremely long time as well.








I genuinely think the only one worth keeping potentially is


because he can be fixed fairly easily.
I do not mind, but need to confirm first.

@Wokistan @Crabwhale @Mr._Bambu @AbaddonTheDisappointment @Spinosaurus75DinosaurFan @EmperorRorepme @Matthew_Schroeder @EliminatorVenom

Is this fine with you?
 
Okay. Thank you for the reply.
 
I'd like to note that while I am a proponent on Warhammer and have consumed a good chunk of the media, my ass should not be making executive decisions. The verse is massive and despite having read some books and played some games, I don't even recognize half the names of those pages. Crab and Holy ought to be your go-to's for that.
 
I know there is major 40k revisions planned for the future, these profiles just make me sad/mad.

Zero scans/justifications/poor reasonings. Just old 2017 era profiles that make the verse look worse then it needs too, I also doubt that anyone is going to remake/fix them for an extremely long time as well.








I genuinely think the only one worth keeping potentially is


because he can be fixed fairly easily.
I'd like to note that while I am a proponent on Warhammer and have consumed a good chunk of the media, my ass should not be making executive decisions. The verse is massive and despite having read some books and played some games, I don't even recognize half the names of those pages. Crab and Holy ought to be your go-to's for that.
Okay.

@Holyhotsauce

Your input would also be appreciated here.
 
I am with Jason. I would rather have less of low quality files than having "muh not interested in this info". The same visitors could turn around and make pages. Ant, you don't have to deal with them most of the time, but we do. Just increases workload for verse supporters. So, yes, that should be added. Visitors can just ignore it.
I have been hammering people since the dawn of time to give references to the Marvel and DC scans in calcs and especially in the profiles (In calcs you don't have to go that far, just name the issue and that's that), and I am fairly certain Marvel and DC were the very first verses where references were deemed mandatory even before any talks of applying the References rules were applied.

We are certainly not going to delete old profiles just because they don't have references, but we will work on giving them the love and care they truly deserve. However, if new pages are going to be made without careful planning in advance, people are just asking for them to be deleted.

Which is where the sandbox comes in. You can do whatever you want in the world there and nobody will bat an eye, you can take your time creating the profile, finessing the sandbox and asking others to help out, it's essentially your playground where others can also edit out without fear of being locked out by page locks by staff members.

Honestly at this point I'd recommend asking people to make a sandbox to test out the waters on their page first before making it an actual profile page. Saves time later.
 
The problem here is that I think that only a few staff members other than myself patrol the wiki edits currently, and I am already working very hard to keep up on top of trying to fit in exercise and meditation lessons and trying to be a bit social IRL. As such, I cannot constantly backup all new pages without references to sandboxes for the page creators, and then delete them every day, on top of everything else.
 
Also Second Form's shot has a gal in her teens with a panty shot, so could be a wee innapropriate if we REALLY want to get picky, I personally don't give a damn, but still.
 
Back
Top