- 3,313
- 661
Spiral is downplayed???Character's downplayed to 7-B off of this supposed rivalry off ONE RUN when she's pretty consistent at High 6-C with powers otherwise, and using whataboutisms on other files is inconsiderate of the fact it's 600 ******* files, we've already tried doing major referencing and updating projects like Daredevil, Deadpool and Iron Man which was taxing as ****, and no, it's still adding to the workload since I'd have to scour 100 more issues, and ****, Spiral is a 90s character.
Meanwhile page poster admits to not having read her appearances fully, and for some reason acts like we don't list the references thing very bluntly in Powerscaling Rules page, hell it's site standard now.
Jinx if you want we can retrieve the source code for you to shift it into your sandbox to fix up the issues stated, but the page in its current state I completely disagree being up.
I don't think shes High 6-C at all honestly, she just relies heavily on Hax and magic. You could make the argument but I did mention it could have been higher. Nonetheless her run with Psylocke is clearly her most involved run and display of prowess. Shes a menace to characters like Rogue at most, but shes always knocked out in one hit usually.
I still dont see the problem with just Spiral when these 600 files contain the majority of much more appeared and controversial characters. If you're giving this treatment to 1 page, and you havent bothered to inform beforehand of the way it works in disclaimer, and every other page is allowed to thrive on scans (and i had more references than most), then i dont see why just Spiral is so intimidating. Especially when the respect thread compiles most of her feats since 2017. Certainly not enough to outright delete.
No, not every Marvel fan reads every single comic iteration of the character, nor has the time or interest to go down that rabbit hole. I get that clearly makes me 'inferior' in being able to reference (Though nobody uses references over scans in debating just generally, theyre a courtesy), but nonetheless shouldnt be enough to gatekeep, especially when i had scans that show individual powers in just one page.
It certainly was never inforced. In Editing Rules, it states that 'Always include the References section in character pages', but from what im seeing, tons of pages, even new ones dont have (or need most of the time) the references. None of them get deleted for not referencing absolutely every single thing. I get Marvel and DC are convoluted verses, but i dont see why scans dont suffice for power ability listings, and i compromised with referencing for actual stat justifications. I dont see why its only my 1 page thats being enforced this strongly about it
You need a bold disclaimer on the actual Marvel Verse page that the pages are all apparently being revamped to fit this new 'minimum standard', so that people dont waste their time and feel trampled on when the page gets completely deleted cause it was using scans like mostly every other Marvel page on this wiki.
I saved the source code myself knowing something like this could happen, and if its a compromise then whatever, (I dont exactly want to read every iteration of Spirals appearances, thats homework. I have a paid job and land to look over) but I still really dont see why just Spiral is being targeted with this treatment. Because shes a 90s character? When mostly every other character whose got a page has had more appearences and more controversy behind her?
Seems to just be a hugely unnecessary delete, and hardly anything added to your workload as is given the state of the majority of profiles now incomplete.