- 6,034
- 3,061
Paul Bunyan can shatter the entire Rocky Mountain range with a single pickaxe strikeWhat's the Paul Bunyun feat again?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Paul Bunyan can shatter the entire Rocky Mountain range with a single pickaxe strikeWhat's the Paul Bunyun feat again?
"Just because a nuke was set off point-blank inside someone's body doesn't mean anything. If he was really comparable to the nuke he wouldn't have died, Ignore how this other character has TWO feats of tanking said nuke from the outside"Just because Caliburn was inside Berserker doesn't mean anything, if he was really comparable to Caliburn, he would't have been killed 7 times over
Name the two feats of him tanking an A+ Rank Noble Phantasm"Just because a nuke was set off point-blank inside someone's body doesn't mean anything. If he was really comparable to the nuke he wouldn't have died, Ignore how this other character has TWO feats of tanking said nuke from the outside"
Is that feat based on Paul Bunyans Noble Phantasm and if so? What Rank is their Noble Phantasm?
Herc got killed 7 times over by the NP inside of his own body, the sword released the light inside of himExcept you know... Herc got killed 7 times over by an A+ Rank Noble Phantasm
Bruh what, that's the opposite of how it works. Serveral things have been made outdated from that era, or changed and elaborated on, thus newer stuff takes precedence otherwise you get absurd stuff like Gil>Arjuna Alter because he's the strongest servant.And since Fate/Stay Night is the first Fate, it takes priority as the source material
I said this other character.Name the two feats of him tanking an A+ Rank Noble Phantasm
Is that feat based on Paul Bunyans Noble Phantasm and if so? What Rank is their Noble Phantasm?
His NP it's A and it's bassically she stepping, because of his great size it's treated more or less like Kingprotea.Is that feat based on Paul Bunyans Noble Phantasm and if so? What Rank is their Noble Phantasm?
I mean if the Nero feats are it, then those are the outliers, I don't agree that the Berserker feat isn't valid, it's far more valid than the Nero onesI said this other character.
Nero blocks galatine. Twice. That's two feats, above one feat that has very specific circumstances behind it that you oh-so-conveniently keep ignoring.
It's A-rank.
Cause Herc explicity has one of the best defenses and durability's in the seriesWhy focus on herc so much?
What other characters survived Rank A+ AP based NP's?
As Paul said. Why would Multiple nero feats be the outlier over a single feat that has special circumstances behind it.I mean if the Nero feats are it, then those are the outliers
Prove it. You have to prove things in threads like this instead of repeating the same claim that doesn't even help your argumentI don't agree that the Berserker feat isn't valid, it's far more valid than the Nero ones
Because it is one thing if it killed him once, but it had enough power to kill him 7 times at once!Prove it. You have to prove things in threads like this instead of repeating the same claim that doesn't even help your argument
Yeah, when it was being wielded by two people at once, one of whom was ******* artoria, and it was EMBEDDED IN HIS INTERNALS THAT ARE < HIS EXTERNAL DURABILITY, that is a WIKI WIDE ASSUMPTION. If you want to discount that, good luck doing that to every single verseBecause it is one thing if it killed him once, but it had enough power to kill him 7 times at once!
Yes, Herc has something that completely negates lower ranked attacks and is explicitly his skinCause Herc explicity has one of the best defenses and durability's in the series
What evidence is there that "A Rank Noble Phantasms" aren't far below "A+ Rank Noble Phantasms"?Yes, Herc has something that completely negates lower ranked attacks and is explicitly his skin
So something inside his body, where, shocker, his skin isn't covering, wouldn't really get defended against much
Now again as I said earlier in the thread and showed, the difference between ranks is absolutely not that big, so scaling them to different calcs doesn't make all too much sense, the weaker ones would just backscale from others bar special circumstances. And thus, treating surviving an A+ vs surviving an A as a major difference is an incorrect assumption. Unless you can prove that the difference between ranks is big and that NPs shouldn't be relative to eachother either.
So for other NPs he tanked, Caladbolg, with 0 damage. A broken phantasm one too so yes, it would have pierced his defense. Skinned Herc (no defenses or extra lives) survived eight hits (eight hits using his own strength which has been seen to be relative to NPs) from Nine Lives Blade Works. He survived Durandina through the chest, as did Asterios, the list goes on, and this is just for Herc.
I mean i don't have much problem with how you want backscake thing.What evidence is there that "A Rank Noble Phantasms" aren't far below "A+ Rank Noble Phantasms"?
Is that stated anywhere?
I mean in the same visual novel saber alter have tank a little weakened belcephon which is A+Based on the info I'm seeing, I'm in agreement with Mitch. That Arondight thing came in clutch for the 1/3 scaling. 6-C base stats, 6-C+ A-Rank NPs, and Low 6-B A+ and higher NPs is what I'm gathering and I think that's good.
As for Nero, that's one character compared to others, especially when Heracles has one of the best defenses in the series. Let me put it this way: Berserker has one of the best defenses in the series and dies to an A-Rank NP, but somehow that's less valid than Nero, someone with less defensive prowess than Berserker, surviving an A+ Rank? Even if you say that the gap between A and A+ isn't much, that doesn't change the questionability of someone with less defense surviving a stronger attack when a weaker one killed a more defensively capable character.
Not even the "attacking from the inside" argument changes that fact.
Caliburn's not A-rank, it's A+-rank.As for Nero, that's one character compared to others, especially when Heracles has one of the best defenses in the series. Let me put it this way: Berserker has one of the best defenses in the series and dies to an A-Rank NP, but somehow that's less valid than Nero, someone with less defensive prowess than Berserker, surviving an A+ Rank? Even if you say that the gap between A and A+ isn't much, that doesn't change the questionability of someone with less defense surviving a stronger attack when a weaker one killed a more defensively capable character.
Blocking an attack and being exhausted afterwards and dying to an equally-powerful attack that bypasses your main defense and goes off inside your internal organs are two things that can coexist, and it's really dumb to pretend they can'tNot even the "attacking from the inside" argument changes that fact.
I'd retort with, what evidence is there that A+ rank NPs are far above A rank ones? The person making the positive claim "A+ rank NPs are far beyond A ranks" is the one who has to prove itWhat evidence is there that "A Rank Noble Phantasms" aren't far below "A+ Rank Noble Phantasms"?
Is that stated anywhere?
He died before the Hector thing actually, our group takes him out, he comes back, then Jason has Hector spear Asterios, which gets Herc as well.Is it relevant to mention that Herc lost a life to Hekrors NP in ocean's? Just 1 life. It's rank A.
Except again, Nero's is more recent, thats the bottom line. Newer, if it contradicts older, takes precedent. And even disregarding that fact, Herc has survived A rank NPs before. He's also survived literal 2-A attacks, so his defenses being used as a consistent thing to rule out other examples doesn't even make sense when its inconsistent. He goes from dying to the internal attacks of Caliburn, to tanking Caladbolg, to having Gil's spears pierce him, to tanking Loptr Laegjarn, to tanking 2 shots from Artemis, to dying to Chaldea, to tanking Hector's spear and living. Yes, definitely a much more consistent thing than Nero surviving something twice, proving that it wasn't a fluke.As for Nero, that's one character compared to others, especially when Heracles has one of the best defenses in the series. Let me put it this way: Berserker has one of the best defenses in the series and dies to an A-Rank NP, but somehow that's less valid than Nero, someone with less defensive prowess than Berserker, surviving an A+ Rank? Even if you say that the gap between A and A+ isn't much, that doesn't change the questionability of someone with less defense surviving a stronger attack when a weaker one killed a more defensively capable character.
Why wouldn't it? Is internal durability suddenly equal to the external one? Is God Hand (His skin) suddenly protecting his insides too?Not even the "attacking from the inside" argument changes that fact.
First off, I'm talking about Gil's A-Rank NP spam. A-Rank NPs from Gate of Babylon could kill him.Caliburn's not A-rank, it's A+-rank.
ALso, what Regidan said. Bellerophon is A+ and hit Saber directly and she was getting back up before Shirou finished the job
Blocking an attack and being exhausted afterwards and dying to an equally-powerful attack that bypasses your main defense and goes off inside your internal organs are two things that can coexist, and it's really dumb to pretend they can't
So just because it's newer, it should take precedence when someone with higher defensive ability dies to something weaker? I don't agree with that. Also, about what you said with A and A+ Ranks, the burden of proof is on you to prove that there isn't much of a gap. You need to do that, not answer it with a question asking the opposite.Except again, Nero's is more recent, thats the bottom line. Newer, if it contradicts older, takes precedent. And even disregarding that fact, Herc has survived A rank NPs before. He's also survived literal 2-A attacks, so his defenses being used as a consistent thing to rule out other examples doesn't even make sense when its inconsistent. He goes from dying to the internal attacks of Caliburn, to tanking Caladbolg, to having Gil's spears pierce him, to tanking Loptr Laegjarn, to tanking 2 shots from Artemis, to dying to Chaldea, to tanking Hector's spear and living. Yes, definitely a much more consistent thing than Nero surviving something twice, proving that it wasn't a fluke.
Nuh uh, that's not how it works, the burden of proof is on you to prove that A Rank NP's are comparable to A+ Rank NP's, the higher Rank means a lot as A++ are far stronger than A+ NP'sI'd retort with, what evidence is there that A+ rank NPs are far above A rank ones? The person making the positive claim "A+ rank NPs are far beyond A ranks" is the one who has to prove it
Don't have tell she get hit by the full NP and She was not really crippled, as she was able to lift up in the vn she just need regen for being able to refight. And tanking 10% A+ rank is still bigIn the VN, Saber didn't get hit by the full power of Bellerophon at all, Excalibur Morgan was said to have offset 90% of the attack because of the clash and even then, Saber was left crippled on the floor and would have gotten back up because of her regeneration, not because of just her durability
Hektor kills Herc 1 time with an A-Rank Np while a Buffed Caliburn can kill Herc 7 times over, As Rank A+. That's a comparison of power isn't it? Is that a 6x difference?Nuh uh, that's not how it works, the burden of proof is on you to prove that A Rank NP's are comparable to A+ Rank NP's, the higher Rank means a lot as A++ are far stronger than A+ NP's
Higher Rank = More Power
So you need to provide evidence as to why A Rank is the same level of power as A+ Rank
For the higher rank, is not really true in fgo (look at kama rank C, and kingprotea rank E that allow her to use her full power, Arn nova salomon D rank)Nuh uh, that's not how it works, the burden of proof is on you to prove that A Rank NP's are comparable to A+ Rank NP's, the higher Rank means a lot as A++ are far stronger than A+ NP's
Higher Rank = More Power
So you need to provide evidence as to why A Rank is the same level of power as A+ Rank
Well killing Herc 1 time is still one-shotting Base Servant statsHektor kills Herc 1 time with an A-Rank Np while a Buffed Caliburn can kill Herc 7 times over. As Rank A+. That's a comparison of power isn't it? Is that a 6x difference?
I have the scans if needed. not idea if this is usable though for anything though..
Bellerophon is 2.8 teratons, so Saber Alter basically took 280 gigatons of AP and was severely injured from it. That's consistent with 6-C base Servants, and way more consistent than taking a full A+ Rank twice. Sure, it happened twice, but it's inconsistent with other feats of NPs nuking or severely wounding Servants, and even the established fact that NPs are basically special moves that are far above what a Servant can normally do.Don't have tell she get hit by the full NP and She was not really crippled, as she was able to lift up in the vn she just need regen for being able to refight. And tanking 10% A+ rank is still big
280 is High 6-C tho but i have no prob with thisBellerophon is 2.8 teratons, so Saber Alter basically took 280 gigatons of AP and was severely injured from it. That's consistent with 6-C base Servants, and way more consistent than taking a full A+ Rank twice. Sure, it happened twice, but it's inconsistent with other feats of NPs nuking or severely wounding Servants, and even the established fact that NPs are basically special moves that are far above what a Servant can normally do.
My point for that was that she was severely injured by a 280 gigaton attack. That's consistent with the 6-C rating, as it's not uncommon in fiction to be severely wounded by attacks much stronger than you.280 is High 6-C tho but i have no prob with this