- 11,908
- 4,281
i still feel like it is kind of redundant since it changes absolutely nothing whatsoever, but meh, add it
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can you unlockYeah
Manga profiles too bro
sadly nobody is shown to resist hakai in the manga but son goku DBS manga already has soul destruction listed idk why it took so lojg forManga profiles too bro
there isn't enough agreement, damage disagrees, lord grifin is neutral and qaw agrees, 1 agree, 1 neutral, 1 disagree, not enough to be applied
I understand, if the manga has it then that's fine.sadly nobody is shown to resist hakai in the manga but son goku DBS manga already has soul destruction listed idk why it took so lojg for
there isn't enough agreement, damage disagrees, lord grifin is neutral and qaw agrees, 1 agree, 1 neutral, 1 disagree, not enough to be applied
Yes we have.Yeah
.Seems okay
no we don't, the word of one admin saying that he agrees with the changes and that they could be applied in his opinion does not mean that a thread is aproved, we need at least 3 agreement by staff for threads to be able to be added in cases of big verses like dbYes we have.
content mods to not have the authority to approve content revisions, that role is to burecrats, admins and thread mods, these are the rules
content mods to not have the authority to approve content revisions, that role is to burecrats, admins and thread mods, these are the rules
Is this true, bro?Yeah
Well my yeah was "Yeah I believe the changes can be applied" rather than "Yeah, apply the changes now".Yes we have.
Is this true, bro?
also in the linked page:Its a very minor edit anyway
Right, bro! Thank you very much.Well my yeah was "Yeah I believe the changes can be applied" rather than "Yeah, apply the changes now".
He has authority over it, so yes! He can give his opinion and his opinion is law."It is the responsibility of Thread Moderators, Administrators, and Bureaucrats to review and approve content revisions for the verses in this wiki, and they should make an effort to base their evaluations on valid arguments, not personal opinions."Discussion Rules
VS Battles Wiki is a site where the members attempt to index the statistics of characters across different fictional franchises. These efforts lead to much discussion about certain feats, statements and calculations regarding their validity, reliability, etc. However, certain topics keep popping...vsbattles.fandom.com
only these 3 staff can approve content revisions, written in the link posted
also in the linked page:
"n cases where the series verse has a significant following or a large amount of material has been published based on its content, it may be necessary to seek approval from a minimum of three staff members to ensure that all relevant parties are aware of and agree with the proposed revisions."
db is too big, we need at least 3
Dang I didn’t know content moderators didnt count so we’ll need one more but we don’t need 3 since this isn’t controversial 3 is only needed for controversial crts this crt is pretty straightforward and already accepted pretty much
Administrator ordered to apply now!Well my yeah was "Yeah I believe the changes can be applied" rather than "Yeah, apply the changes now".
who are you talking about? because i think you are confusing what i said, @Marvel_Champion_07 agreement was what i was talking about, also no ones opinion is law, wtf are you talking about?He has authority over it, so yes! He can give his opinion and his opinion is law.
it is a big verse so yes we do, if the verse is big then it automatically needs 3Dang I didn’t know content moderators didnt count so we’ll need one more but we don’t need 3 since this isn’t controversial 3 is only needed for controversial crts this crt is pretty straightforward and already accepted pretty much
Well i wouldnt be able to do son goku vegeta and frieza’s profile either way but can you get another staff id rather be safe than sorryAdministrator ordered to apply now!
Its for controversial crts this crt isnt controversial only 2 staff agrees are neededwho are you talking about? because i think you are confusing what i said, @Marvel_Champion_07 agreement was what i was talking about, also no ones opinion is law, wtf are you talking about?
it is a big verse so yes we do, if the verse is big then it automatically needs 3
no he didn'tAdministrator ordered to apply now!
he was just agreeing, one admin agreeing is not enough for a content revision to be applied, i think you should really read the page i linkedWell my yeah was "Yeah I believe the changes can be applied" rather than "Yeah, apply the changes now".
nope:Well i wouldnt be able to do son goku vegeta and frieza’s profile either way but can you get another staff id rather be safe than sorry
Its for controversial crts this crt isnt controversial only 2 staff agrees are needed
Read the final part where it quotes "apply changes now"no he didn't
he was just agreeing, one admin agreeing is not enough for a content revision to be applied, i think you should really read the page i linked
I'll call more others, so Omega doesn't get derailed endlessly here.Well i wouldnt be able to do son goku vegeta and frieza’s profile either way but can you get another staff id rather be safe than sorry
are you okay? i don't want to be rude, but the message was he litterally saying that he didn't said thatRead the final part where it quotes "apply changes now"
Well my yeah was "Yeah I believe the changes can be applied" rather than "Yeah, apply the changes now".
you are the one derailing by trying to apply a not yet approved thread, anyway can you not start with the petty accusations please? you always do that and it serves no purpose whatsoeverI'll call more others, so Omega doesn't get derailed endlessly here.
Did you say apply or was that a misinterpretation on my part?Well my yeah was "Yeah I believe the changes can be applied" rather than "Yeah, apply the changes now".
We aren’t breaking any rules it also mentions that that’s only needed when it’s a controversial topic https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Discussion_Rules#Content_Revisions only a minimum of 2 are needed but yeah it does seem like content moderators votes don’t count so ill try to get more staff inputnope:
"in cases where the series verse has a significant following or a large amount of material has been published based on its content, it may be necessary to seek approval from a minimum of three staff members to ensure that all relevant parties are aware of and agree with the proposed revisions."
the series is big enough, so it needs 3, these are the rules, we need to follow them
when did i said that you were?We aren’t breaking any rules
in small verses yes, but in cases of big verses like db we need at least 3 no matter what, that is why there is separated section for big verses on the page, cases like db, naruto, one piece etc are exeptions that need 3 votes no matter what due to how big their following isit also mentions that that’s only needed when it’s a controversial topic https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Discussion_Rules#Content_Revisions only a minimum of 2 are needed but yeah it does seem like content moderators votes don’t count so ill try to get more staff input
It tells us that it may ne necessary meaning it’s situational and gives an example of when this may need to happen this is supported by the fact that in basically every db crt 2 staff is all that is needed besides the controversial one which was infinite db universewhen did i said that you were?
in small verses yes, but in cases of big verses like db we need at least 3 no matter what, that is why there is separated section for big verses on the page, cases like db, naruto, one piece etc are exeptions that need 3 votes no matter what due to how big their following is
yeah, in cases where the verse has a huge followingIt tells us that it may ne necessary meaning it’s situational
and gives an example of when this may need to happen
not according to the rules nothis is supported by the fact that in basically every db crt 2 staff is all that is needed besides the controversial one which was infinite db universe
it isn't accepted, that is the point of the thread in the first placeAnd adding something that’s already accepted isn’t controversial in anyway
You’re kinda taking it out of context and I gave the explanation for it but i suppose we can ask a staffyeah, in cases where the verse has a huge following
not according to the rules no
it isn't accepted, that is the point of the thread in the first place
anyway, this back and forth is derail and we should stop, just go ask an admin or mod about or something
Yeah, for uncontroversial CRTs 2 staff agreements are enough, infact I recently have seen many CRTs to pass with just 1 thread mod and 1 content mod, users don't really disregard their votes even in controversial CRTs. This thread can be applied. It's just small P&A addition.You’re kinda taking it out of context and I gave the explanation for it but i suppose we can ask a staff
Its accepted that it can destroy souls we’re merely adding it on the profile like how it is for manga but Luffy is getting staff evaluation either way
Yeah but now there should be no stone walling since we have 2 admins agreements this thread is pretty much done besides thisYeah, for uncontroversial CRTs 2 staff agreements are enough, infact I recently have seen many CRTs to pass with just 1 thread mod and 1 content mod, users don't really disregard their votes even in controversial CRTs. This thread can be applied. It's just small P&A addition.If each random small CRT needs 3 staff then many CRTs will just stay unapplied for weeks to months.
content mods do not have the authority sadly enough, but go onYeah, for uncontroversial CRTs 2 staff agreements are enough, infact I recently have seen many CRTs to pass with just 1 thread mod and 1 content mod, users don't really disregard their votes even in controversial CRTs. This thread can be applied. It's just small P&A addition.If each random small CRT needs 3 staff then many CRTs will just stay unapplied for weeks to months.
Yeah and the discussion rules don’t even say we need 3 votes for each minor individual thread just for controversial ones
They're unlocked now, you can apply the changes.
it says that we need for any crt of big following verses period
I have done so you may ask to close those profilesThey're unlocked now, you can apply the changes.
You can close this thread. Changes has been applied.Looks alright.