- 9,692
- 3,310
i still feel like it is kind of redundant since it changes absolutely nothing whatsoever, but meh, add it
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Minor revision towards resisting destruction energy
- Thread starter Ikelaggan
- Start date
- Status
- 3,330
- 4,350
- 10,160
- 5,036
Manga profiles too bro
- 3,330
- 4,350
sadly nobody is shown to resist hakai in the manga but son goku DBS manga already has soul destruction listed idk why it took so lojg for
- 9,692
- 3,310
there isn't enough agreement, damage disagrees, lord grifin is neutral and qaw agrees, 1 agree, 1 neutral, 1 disagree, not enough to be applied
- 10,160
- 5,036
I understand, if the manga has it then that's fine.
- 10,160
- 5,036
Yes we have.
- 10,160
- 5,036
- 9,692
- 3,310
no we don't, the word of one admin saying that he agrees with the changes and that they could be applied in his opinion does not mean that a thread is aproved, we need at least 3 agreement by staff for threads to be able to be added in cases of big verses like db
- 9,692
- 3,310
content mods to not have the authority to approve content revisions, that role is to burecrats, admins and thread mods, these are the rules
- 10,160
- 5,036
Is this true, bro?
- 5,823
- 5,650
Its a very minor edit anyway
- 19,528
- 15,822
Well my yeah was "Yeah I believe the changes can be applied" rather than "Yeah, apply the changes now".
- 9,692
- 3,310
Discussion Rules
VS Battles Wiki is a site where the members attempt to index the statistics of characters across different fictional franchises. These efforts lead to much discussion about certain feats, statements and calculations regarding their validity, reliability, etc. However, certain topics keep popping...
vsbattles.fandom.com
only these 3 staff can approve content revisions, written in the link posted
also in the linked page:
"n cases where the series verse has a significant following or a large amount of material has been published based on its content, it may be necessary to seek approval from a minimum of three staff members to ensure that all relevant parties are aware of and agree with the proposed revisions."
db is too big, we need at least 3
- 10,160
- 5,036
Right, bro! Thank you very much.
- 10,160
- 5,036
He has authority over it, so yes! He can give his opinion and his opinion is law."It is the responsibility of Thread Moderators, Administrators, and Bureaucrats to review and approve content revisions for the verses in this wiki, and they should make an effort to base their evaluations on valid arguments, not personal opinions."Discussion Rules
VS Battles Wiki is a site where the members attempt to index the statistics of characters across different fictional franchises. These efforts lead to much discussion about certain feats, statements and calculations regarding their validity, reliability, etc. However, certain topics keep popping...
only these 3 staff can approve content revisions, written in the link posted
also in the linked page:
"n cases where the series verse has a significant following or a large amount of material has been published based on its content, it may be necessary to seek approval from a minimum of three staff members to ensure that all relevant parties are aware of and agree with the proposed revisions."
db is too big, we need at least 3
- 3,330
- 4,350
Dang I didn’t know content moderators didnt count so we’ll need one more but we don’t need 3 since this isn’t controversial 3 is only needed for controversial crts this crt is pretty straightforward and already accepted pretty much
- 10,160
- 5,036
Administrator ordered to apply now!
- 9,692
- 3,310
who are you talking about? because i think you are confusing what i said, @Marvel_Champion_07 agreement was what i was talking about, also no ones opinion is law, wtf are you talking about?
it is a big verse so yes we do, if the verse is big then it automatically needs 3
- 3,330
- 4,350
Well i wouldnt be able to do son goku vegeta and frieza’s profile either way but can you get another staff id rather be safe than sorry
Its for controversial crts this crt isnt controversial only 2 staff agrees are needed
- 9,692
- 3,310
no he didn't
he was just agreeing, one admin agreeing is not enough for a content revision to be applied, i think you should really read the page i linked
- 9,692
- 3,310
nope:
"in cases where the series verse has a significant following or a large amount of material has been published based on its content, it may be necessary to seek approval from a minimum of three staff members to ensure that all relevant parties are aware of and agree with the proposed revisions."
the series is big enough, so it needs 3, these are the rules, we need to follow them
- 10,160
- 5,036
Read the final part where it quotes "apply changes now"
- 10,160
- 5,036
I'll call more others, so Omega doesn't get derailed endlessly here.
- 9,692
- 3,310
are you okay? i don't want to be rude, but the message was he litterally saying that he didn't said that
"used for saying that one thing is preferred to another or happens instead of another. Doug chose to quit rather than admit that he'd made a mistake."
this is like, basic grammatical structure dude, i really do not intend to be rude, i know you are brazilian just like me, but this phrase structure and wording also exists in brazil so i am confused on how you mistook that
you are the one derailing by trying to apply a not yet approved thread, anyway can you not start with the petty accusations please? you always do that and it serves no purpose whatsoever
- 10,160
- 5,036
Did you say apply or was that a misinterpretation on my part?
- 3,330
- 4,350
We aren’t breaking any rules it also mentions that that’s only needed when it’s a controversial topic https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Discussion_Rules#Content_Revisions only a minimum of 2 are needed but yeah it does seem like content moderators votes don’t count so ill try to get more staff input
- 9,692
- 3,310
when did i said that you were?
in small verses yes, but in cases of big verses like db we need at least 3 no matter what, that is why there is separated section for big verses on the page, cases like db, naruto, one piece etc are exeptions that need 3 votes no matter what due to how big their following is
- 3,330
- 4,350
It tells us that it may ne necessary meaning it’s situational and gives an example of when this may need to happen this is supported by the fact that in basically every db crt 2 staff is all that is needed besides the controversial one which was infinite db universe
And adding something that’s already accepted isn’t controversial in anyway
- 9,692
- 3,310
yeah, in cases where the verse has a huge following
not according to the rules no
it isn't accepted, that is the point of the thread in the first place
anyway, this back and forth is derail and we should stop, just go ask an admin or mod about or something
- 3,330
- 4,350
You’re kinda taking it out of context and I gave the explanation for it but i suppose we can ask a staff
Its accepted that it can destroy souls we’re merely adding it on the profile like how it is for manga but Luffy is getting staff evaluation either way
- 29,893
- 30,906
Looks alright.
- 9,631
- 10,327
Yeah, for uncontroversial CRTs 2 staff agreements are enough, infact I recently have seen many CRTs to pass with just 1 thread mod and 1 content mod, users don't really disregard their votes even in controversial CRTs. This thread can be applied. It's just small P&A addition.
- 3,330
- 4,350
Yeah but now there should be no stone walling since we have 2 admins agreements this thread is pretty much done besides this
- 9,692
- 3,310
content mods do not have the authority sadly enough, but go on
- 9,692
- 3,310
- 9,631
- 10,327
They're unlocked now, you can apply the changes.
- 3,330
- 4,350
IT MAY BE this isn’t controversial
I have done so you may ask to close those profiles
- 9,631
- 10,327
You can close this thread. Changes has been applied.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
