- 15,281
- 7,010
You should close this thread and check the new one tbf.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You should close this thread and check the new one tbf.
Yes. Eficiente's suggestions were accepted and multiple staff members support the ratings. We just need Bill's profile to be unlocked to change the ratingsI am not sure. Weren't Eficiente's suggestions accepted, and still have to be applied?
The thread's too disorganized, sorry.Okay I open an new revision. It would be better to get more input for the author's explanations, Effience, can you convey your thoughts here as well please?
Yeah this is my fault, can you at least look at the blog? I also think same uni + but in a slightly different way.The thread's too disorganized, sorry.
I do not agree with this I think more input should be given the other threadSo should I close the other thread then?
The CRT has moved on from the twitter scans ting and we have other evidences presented there that aren't fake scansWell, Eficiente has rejected it and much of the premise was proven as false.
...no.So should I close the other thread then?
Sorry but no, he didn't, he just implied to me not to try, Frankly I just think Bill is still not low 2-c ''via rift'', he is directly low 2-c(there are 2 scans for this on the blog). Anyway, my aim is not to do low 1-c, and in that other thread, hax issue and speed issue were brought up, so it should definitely not be closed. Please Ant don't do thisWell, Eficiente has rejected it and much of the premise was proven as false.
I mean, can you close this thread instead of the new one? This one, unlike the new, got 6 pages, no one would read it anymore unlike the new one tbh.Okay. No problem. It can stay open for the time being then.
Yeah prove itI saw it, if you want an upgrade because of it then it doesn't do it, it just shows a bunch of info that doesn't matter.
That huge blog you said would amount to what you say if it was made only for Bill, but unfortunately, the huge blog you said was not just for Bill but for cosmology and some misunderstanding, If you really think ı did it for something like hoodwink against you, please count as you like, because my propose was just to give you my opinion of Bill, and you didn't even bother to debunk it.I would rather wait for the wiki to have higher standards than "here's a bunch of text, you need to go over all of it to satisfy people or else they're going to insist to apply it w/o caring to organize things better". Can't things just come in the form of 1 question or proposal at a time? Or at least some text that would hypothetically be in Bill's AP would be better than to just send into a huge blog.
How many panels do I need to prove that exactly the word world always means universe, just tell me how many I need to find, that would be easier.(After all, we were taking it as a universe in series like maou gakuin if I remember correctly.)Starting with 1 thing; using "world" as in reality a few times or even many times doesn't mean a verse always does so, it's just a word that can mean that and that's it. That's a very wanked and common thing on the wiki despite how basic it is.
Context is what matter, if u disagree, go to that thread and debunk itNo amount matters, it's just a word that can mean that when used, you can't just kill language like that, that's like taking in that some person you know always means 1 meaning of a word when used because they many times did so, you would have to go get help if you do so.
as I more or less understand your problem, let me try anyway;No amount matters, it's just a word that can mean that when used, you can't just kill language like that, that's like taking in that some person you know always means 1 meaning of a word when used because they many times did so, you would have to go get help if you do so.
I don't care about what other verses do when evaluating 1 verse, "certain" people just grab in the work of others with less and less meaning over time until it all just becomes a sad parody, and they roll with it not because it's what it makes most sense, but boosted by their ego knowing other people have already agreed to it before and how it can be generally accepted now. Some Dragon Quest profiles until recently claimed a character to be able to blow up universes while linking as evidence 1 image in Imgur of said character being said to cause devastation on worlds, while below it the user who uploaded the image wrote that world means universe in Dragon Quest, aiming to make others believe that by their word alone in 1 sentence. That cringe isn't made up in a vacuum, a series of mistakes we do as a wiki makes users propose things like it, other people accept that, and everyone else act like nothing's wrong later, then that gets imitated as bad as it is or worst and the process repeats itself.
he is not, the worlds refers as universe in this caseEficiente is correct as far as I am aware.
Lmao, this is not for creation, but destruction.Eficiente is correct as far as I am aware.
Here are our standards for this:
Creation Feats
Creation feats are feats in which a character creates objects from nothing by means like Reality Warping or similar. This separates them from feats in which objects are created from already existing materials, which would be calculated by conventional methods, or feats that qualify for...vsbattles.fandom.com
yeh lolLmao, this is not for creation, but destruction.
You seriously can't give credit to someone who just says no and no over and over without elaborating further, but is just complaining on what's happening on wiki just because they're a moderator.
Tbh, is pretty much implied being Low 2-C, going with the blog, each universe/reality/dimension is its own timeline with different laws (like the M Dimension or that Dimension where time doesen't follow the linear logic of ours), making the universes each being Low 2-C, also because of the whole Nightmare Realm stuff, which is the 5D realm that is between all the universes to further confirm so as also stated in the other thread. Also Bill is superior to the Time Baby, a being who can mess with time and can manipulate space-time as well, other than having become a 4D being too. Not to mention that he became infinitely superior than all his previous forms as well.Going by the above scans, a universal scale of power seems reliable, but we don't seem to know if it was a 3-A or Low 2-C level destruction.
My man that stuff is on a Low 1-C scale and via the Weirdmageddon as said in the other thread. This is only about without it.Tbf wanting the destruction of stuff doesn't mean in one shoot all the time, especially when the one time he manages it he does so by letting the rip do all the work.
Yep, this is basically a dead horse now.Okay, so should we continue the discussion in the other Gravity Falls thread, and close this one?
Efi if you just want to complain about the "world usage" (despite in another scan is directly said that Bill can destroy an universe in a pretty explicity way) that's for a wiki-wide CRT, not this. You're just derailing rn.
Context is what matter, if u disagree, go to that thread and debunk it
It's needless to say, if context makes it so that "world" is used as in "universe" in 1 instance then yes in that instance it was used as in universe, what I disagree with is to always take it in as meaning universe regardless of context, like when one can't prove if they meant world or universe. That for all verses. I grabbed that 1 thing to go over and even that was misunderstood, I'm not disagreeing with any specific use of world being said to go as in universe.he is not, the worlds refers as universe in this case
That's all true and all but why does it matter to recompile it? It doesn't serve any purpose, it just proves that in those cases they meant universe when they said world.as I more or less understand your problem, let me try anyway;
I'm not going to prove how many world words scan meaning universe of course but he's the one who diagrams the portal with Ford, and the infinite worlds part of it is written in this diagram (I'm only writing this for close meaning), and after this experiment failed and Fiddleford left, Ford stated in his diary that Bill would destroy reality, (which is definitely the universe,have on the blog) and right after that, because he understood what Bill was going to do (same for Fiddleford).
On top of that, Blendin hints that Bill will destroy the universe. (Have on the blog)
Also Ford uses the word world to mean the universe here, as you can see from the panel, and this panel is the third proof that Bill will destroy the universe.
We have two scan Ford's implies and the time traveler Blendin's scan, I definitely don't think FiddleFord said it in a different sense (if you count him, there are 4 scan), and also I think there's enough scans for Bill.
I mean, Ant, seriously, we got THIS SCAN WHICH EXPLICITY SAYS THAT BILL CAN DESTROY AN UNIVERSE
Same with this
How is that not saying that Bill is Low 2-C, really dude, tell me