XSOULOFCINDERX
They/Them- 21,584
- 9,173
I'm pretty sure even the OP ended up agreeing with what was actually accepted too, so....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wouldn’t say downgraded, I would say adjusted.......Have you read the thread? He's getting downgraded.
Why the rift being 2-A is wrong?I agree with the downgrade physically but the rift being 2-A is wrong.
No it wasn't, Bill himself was, not the rifts, and there was only 1 rift. Being a threat doesn't matter, an assassin in a town is a threat to the town, that doesn't mean he's Town level. That's how dumb putting that info there is.With rifts it was said Bill was a threat to the multiverse
Can be less than 3-A (after destroying "the very fabric of existence" existence may still be there but without its "very fabric", whatever that may be), 3-A, Low 2-C or 2-A, but other things said in those 3 episodes all say that he could destroy the universe, so you go figure. Or rather, you don't if you can't.it was also stated that his rifts were able to destroy the very fabric of existence
I think it does, if im not wrong, there has scans of gravity falls having infinites parallel universes, and destroying the fabric of the existence maybe means destroying everything on the verseWhy would it being 2-A is correct? There are no correct reasons for it.
What? Wdym?Also, it can be that people believe this reasons to be 2-A not because they really believe so on their own, but because other profiles have it that way. The answer to that is; yeah we make mistakes at times.
I'm sorry, but I rlly didnt understood ur reason to disagree with it, please, explain it betterSorry but I feel that replying that those last 2 comments would be incredibly unnecessary. Did the thread became this long via improvable things like this?
Do you want us to reboot this thread due to how it derailed and became too large/cluttered??Sorry but I feel that replying that those last 2 comments would be incredibly unnecessary. Did the thread became this long via improvable things like this?
y?For the record I’m still against the rift being 2-A.
Gravity falls has statements of having infinites parallel universes, destroying the fabric of the existence maybe can be destroying the entire multiverse, who knowsBecause I don’t see the rift destroying the fabric of existence as being above Low 2-C. Saying it’s 2-A requires an extrapolation of the evidence given in Time Baby’s statement.
I don’t think it being a “maybe” is enough to justify 2-A. Low 2-C would be a much safer bet tbh.Gravity falls has statements of having infinites parallel universes, destroying the fabric of the existence maybe can be destroying the entire multiverse, who knows
A ''maybe'' is the reason that ''possibly 2-A'' exist,because ''fabric of the existence'' pretty much can be 2-A if we assume that the verse has infinites parallel universesI don’t think it being a “maybe” is enough to justify 2-A. Low 2-C would be a much safer bet tbh.
Yeah but considering the context it’s a leap to assume Time Baby was referring to the multiverse rather than just the universe they were in.Gravity falls has statements of having infinites parallel universes, destroying the fabric of the existence maybe can be destroying the entire multiverse, who knows