• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Bill Cipher NEP1 CRT

Status
Not open for further replies.
This kind of thought just negate your own args. You said we should ignore narrative and focus on logic cause characters can think but if its about FTL, you said the opposite only because of popularity. You are commiting a pretty big fallacy here, Appeal to Popularity.
My only appeal is to standards

The standards say that if the character can think - they have a mind

The standards also say that the wiki is aware how BS some of FTL shi is, but they can't do anything about it

That's everything I said
 
I dont see any part of the standard
From the NEP page

If one can think - they have a mind
a character who is able to think, and hence has a mind

Moreover, the example for NEP1 Aspect 1 is a stone
that means that the characters simply lack the aspect, in the same way that a stone lacks a soul.

A stone is soulless. So going by that logic, Aspect 3 is mindless
or even staffs mentions they have to mindless.
At least 2 knowledgeable on NEP have said that, but that's DM, so idk if I can show screenshots
 
No and that's a problem. That's the topic I was discussing with Fine, only mindless characters can qualify for NEP1 Aspect 3

Same is true for other aspects too
Oh, that's like all NEP1 characters with aspect minds need to be mindless, I completely disagree.
 
i mean deeper level of nonexistent aspect, and also, there are some character that capable of haxing people who lacking certain aspects, well, it fiction
What I mean is that the lack of aspects makes you resistant to that infinite layers of hax, just like the lack of soul makes you resistant to soul manipulation in infinite layers. So when you give the example of lack of concept aspects, I find it a bit confusing.
 
Well I agree with the NEP1, but am neutral on the Regeneration - it seems more like his body was rapidly transforming than being liquified.
 
And what do you think about Aspect layer?
The aspect topic seems more of a wiki wide discussion than something we'd determine in this thread alone. I'm going off my understanding / what's currently accepted across most profiles.
So what can I do now? Can you open his profile?
Well I am curious if there's any plans to establish what was said in this thread for the wider wiki. If that's the case, I wouldn't personally.

If there isn't any plans, I'd make sure I have right number of the staff votes first.
 
The aspect topic seems more of a wiki wide discussion than something we'd determine in this thread alone. I'm going off my understanding / what's currently accepted across most profiles.

Well I am curious if there's any plans to establish what was said in this thread for the wider wiki. If that's the case, I wouldn't personally.

If there isn't any plans, I'd make sure I have right number of the staff votes first.
So I guess we should just remove the Aspect layers and only add NEP1 to the profile because this is too big a deal; aspect layers should be discussed on the wiki later.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top