Rabbit2002
She/Her- 2,633
- 1,405
I agree with this
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In terms of how this is specified on the pages, the character who is capable of negating the immortality must be specified on which exact types of Immortality they've nullified, the level of Regeneration, if applicable, and the extra existencial aspects otherwise recovered from if an High-Godly level is involved, for example: "Immortality Negation (Type 3 - High-Godly: Concept, 4 - Mid-Godly, and 8 - Mid)".
Additionally, there's some standards to keep in mind:
- Killing a being with Type 1 Immortality would not grant the user Type 1 Immortality Negation, as it's even stated in the Immortality page that they can still die by unnatural causes, and that they're only immune to conventional sickness and dying of old age.
- For negating Type 3 Immortality, killing someone beyond their shown regeneration capabilities would not qualify as it's not nullifying their abilities, but instead them being destroyed beyond their shown capabilities of regeneration.
- Regarding Death Manipulation, it must be shown that the ability is capable of killing someone with a sufficiently high level of regeneration beyond just its base ability of inducing death, as without the evidence to prove it, it would imply it can bypass one's soul, mind, concept, etc. leading to a No Limits Fallacy.
- Being able to negate one specific type of High-Godly Regeneration does not mean one can negate other kinds of High-Godly Regeneration unless the evidence is provided that the user can negate the other types as well.
- Regeneration has little to no connection towards the reality the character exists in as the regeneration in question is revolving around the target individual, not all of existence, so being able to destroy the cosmological structure the character is in won't put them down as High-Godly by default already lets them come back from literal nothingness.
- Lastly, the Immortality Negation should be limited up to the cosmological size the verse is tied to, so anyone that is capable of negating all forms of Immortality on a 3-D scale wouldn't be able to negate qualitatively superior immortalities, especially any Type 8 and 9 Immortalities (and to some extent Type 4 and 5 depending on the context) that stems from a higher dimensional existence as it would be a No Limits Fallacy to assume otherwise.
This part can be misleading.Regeneration has little to no connection towards the reality the character exists in as the regeneration in question is revolving around the target individual, not all of existence, so being able to destroy the cosmological structure the character is in won't put them down as High-Godly by default already lets them come back from literal nothingness.
Ahem...Why are you listing mid-godly for 4 and mid for 8? Those literally have no connections to regeneration.
Regarding types 2, 3, 4, and 8, it should be noted that the degree of the abilities should be specified with the same system used for Regeneration. For example, it should preferably be specified if a character has displayed the ability to withstand injuries up to a Mid level for the purposes of type 2, or has been shown to recover up to such a degree regarding the other types.
He did not respond to new version, also I don't recall pinging for the new status of page.@ImmortalDread he already responded, he hasn’t really commented since
And that's why I'm proposing that change there to for starters, I'm just going to quote a bit from what I'm proposing here to begin with:@Bobsican thats still just regeneration if you’re saying they recovered from that level of damage and recovered.
In terms of how this is specified on the pages, the character who is capable of negating the immortality must be specified on which exact types of Immortality they've nullified, the level of Regeneration, if applicable, and the extra existencial aspects otherwise recovered from if an High-Godly level is involved, for example: "Immortality Negation (Type 3 - High-Godly: Concept, 4 - Mid-Godly, and 8 - Mid)".
We are short on capable mass-editing Bot handlers. There is likely really only @Promestein at the moment, but I am hoping that @Elizhaa will get more interested, and that @Dereck03 , @Just_a_Random_Butler , and @Damage3245 will set up Bot accounts and get instructions from Promestein.@Adem_Warlock69 We can use a bot for that.
@Antvasima We've made a new page for Immortality Negation, can you use a bot to change any and all immortality negation links to fit the new page links?
Also, why was this page applied with such an inconclusive staff tally? And these types of threads should always be posted in our staff forum.Agree: 22 (Tony, Reaper, Fujiwara, Planck, Shake, Deceived, Strangeverse, Tarang, Marvel Champion, Excel, Milly, Dust, Duedate, Vietthai, Artor, Narurias, Gin, Delta, Sheev, Promestein, LordTracer, Rabbit)
Disagree: 6 (Tllmbrg, Dread, Flashlight, DontTalk, Lephyr, Monke [fuse with power null instead of new page])
Neutral: 2 (KLOL, Damage)
If you don't mind, ping @DontTalkDT to approve this page.That said, I personally do not mind Promestein's suggestion.
Okay.If you don't mind, ping @DontTalkDT to approve this page.
I did not contest that it will nullify or stop their regeneration but more so that it will become moot or they will be incapacitated.@TheGreatJedi13 Since when is the reality tied to the character a necessity for the high-godly to work? That would've only applied when we're talking about the old High-Godly since that was literally revolved around the entirety of reality being erased alongside yourself, but it doesn't and you're still coming back from nothingness. Having reality be nuked as well doesn't change the fact it's still literal nothingness coming back. Plus assuming the cosmological structure going away which erases in all 4 levels (which that in of itself needs proof for it to happen), someone who can regen in all 4 types wouldn't really be fazed by it in the end of the day.
@AKM sama @DontTalkDT @DarkDragonMedeus @Mr._Bambu @Celestial_Pegasus @Wokistan @Ultima_Reality @Elizhaa @Qawsedf234 @ByAsura @Sir_Ovens @Damage3245 @Starter_Pack @Abstractions @LordGriffin1000 @Colonel_Krukov @SamanPatou @GyroNutz @Firestorm808 @Everything12 @Maverick_Zero_X @Crabwhale@Antvasima we have a large portion of folks who accepted the page, plus not much staff members really gave input despite me asking a good chunk for input so if you want to get more staff input and they can respond, by all means bring them.
Agree: 22 (Tony, Reaper, Fujiwara, Planck, Shake, Deceived, Strangeverse, Tarang, Marvel Champion, Excel, Milly, Dust, Duedate, Vietthai, Artor, Narurias, Gin, Delta, Sheev, Promestein, LordTracer, Rabbit)
Disagree: 6 (Tllmbrg, Dread, Flashlight, DontTalk, Lephyr, Monke [fuse with power null instead of new page])
Neutral: 2 (KLOL, Damage)
I'll remind that I'm proposing this reformatting of the page.I'm noticing that some wording could be upgraded, you keep listing a standard, then a example on how to index that, then back to a standard, and I think it could be formatted better, so...
In terms of how this is specified on the pages, the character who is capable of negating the immortality must be specified on which exact types of Immortality they've nullified, the level of Regeneration, if applicable, and the extra existencial aspects otherwise recovered from if an High-Godly level is involved, for example: "Immortality Negation (Type 3 - High-Godly: Type 1 Concept, 4 - Mid-Godly, and 8 - Mid)".
Additionally, there's some standards to keep in mind:
- Killing a being with Type 1 Immortality would not grant the user Type 1 Immortality Negation, as it's even stated in the Immortality page that they can still die by unnatural causes, and that they're only immune to conventional sickness and dying of old age.
- For negating Type 3 Immortality, killing someone beyond their shown regeneration capabilities would not qualify as it's not nullifying their abilities, but instead them being destroyed beyond their shown capabilities of regeneration.
- Regarding Death Manipulation, it must be shown that the ability is capable of killing someone with a sufficiently high level of regeneration beyond just its base ability of inducing death, as without the evidence to prove it, it would imply it can bypass one's soul, mind, concept, etc. leading to a No Limits Fallacy.
- Being able to negate one specific type of High-Godly Regeneration does not mean one can negate other kinds of High-Godly Regeneration unless the evidence is provided that the user can negate the other types as well.
- Regeneration has little to no connection towards the reality the character exists in as the regeneration in question is revolving around the target individual, not all of existence, so being able to destroy the cosmological structure the character is in won't put them down as High-Godly by default already lets them come back from literal nothingness.
- Lastly, the Immortality Negation should be limited up to the cosmological size the verse is tied to, so anyone that is capable of negating all forms of Immortality on a 3-D scale wouldn't be able to negate qualitatively superior immortalities, especially any Type 8 and 9 Immortalities (and to some extent Type 4 and 5 depending on the context) that stems from a higher dimensional existence as it would be a No Limits Fallacy to assume otherwise.
Looks fine to me.What do you think about the following newly created page? Promestein seems to have suggested the current format.
Power Nullification
Power Nullification, or Negation, is the ability to nullify the powers and abilities of others, preventing or disabling their effects. The mechanisms by which this effect is accomplished and their restrictions vary from character to character, but the ability is often limited to a certain type...vsbattles.fandom.com
I actually agree with this.I still think the page shouldn't be added as we have a bad case of redundant power pages as is
It looks fine I guess.What do you think about the following newly created page? Promestein seems to have suggested the current format.
Power Nullification
Power Nullification, or Negation, is the ability to nullify the powers and abilities of others, preventing or disabling their effects. The mechanisms by which this effect is accomplished and their restrictions vary from character to character, but the ability is often limited to a certain type...vsbattles.fandom.com
Agree. I don't like unnecessary pages, this is unnecessary.I still think the page shouldn't be added as we have a bad case of redundant power pages as is
I'm noticing that some wording could be upgraded, you keep listing a standard, then a example on how to index that, then back to a standard, and I think it could be formatted better, so...
In terms of how this is specified on the pages, the character who is capable of negating the immortality must be specified on which exact types of Immortality they've nullified, the level of Regeneration, if applicable, and the extra existencial aspects otherwise recovered from if an High-Godly level is involved, for example: "Immortality Negation (Type 3 - High-Godly: Type 1 Concept, 4 - Mid-Godly, and 8 - Mid)".
Additionally, there's some standards to keep in mind:
- Killing a being with Type 1 Immortality would not grant the user Type 1 Immortality Negation, as it's even stated in the Immortality page that they can still die by unnatural causes, and that they're only immune to conventional sickness and dying of old age.
- For negating Type 3 Immortality, killing someone beyond their shown regeneration capabilities would not qualify as it's not nullifying their abilities, but instead them being destroyed beyond their shown capabilities of regeneration.
- Regarding Death Manipulation, it must be shown that the ability is capable of killing someone with a sufficiently high level of regeneration beyond just its base ability of inducing death, as without the evidence to prove it, it would imply it can bypass one's soul, mind, concept, etc. leading to a No Limits Fallacy.
- Being able to negate one specific type of High-Godly Regeneration does not mean one can negate other kinds of High-Godly Regeneration unless the evidence is provided that the user can negate the other types as well.
- Regeneration has little to no connection towards the reality the character exists in as the regeneration in question is revolving around the target individual, not all of existence, so being able to destroy the cosmological structure the character is in won't put them down as High-Godly by default already lets them come back from literal nothingness.
- Lastly, the Immortality Negation should be limited up to the cosmological size the verse is tied to, so anyone that is capable of negating all forms of Immortality on a 3-D scale wouldn't be able to negate qualitatively superior immortalities, especially any Type 8 and 9 Immortalities (and to some extent Type 4 and 5 depending on the context) that stems from a higher dimensional existence as it would be a No Limits Fallacy to assume otherwise.
@Planck69 @Marvel_Champion_07 @Duedate8898 @Promestein @LordTracer @Tllmbrg @Flashlight237 @DontTalkDT @LephyrTheRevanchist @KLOL506I'll remind that I'm proposing this reformatting of the page.
In addition, after seeing some concerns off-site, I wonder if a note should also be made to note that this ability also extends to negating Regeneration, Resurrection and Healing contrary to the name.
If the above is accepted I'd also suggest to rename the page to "Restoration Negation", as it fits a broader scope name-wise to better fit the above.
I think it's a good idea. Since the powers are common enough and different enough to warrant a separation in my view.What do you think about the following newly created page? Promestein seems to have suggested the current format.
I literally want to remove all of those too, outside maybe Energy ProjectionIf we don't accept this just because it is an extra step of power nullification, then why don't we remove all other sub-power like Time Stop, Energy Projection, Petrification, etc?
Looks fine to me.
I think it's good.
I want to clarify, since the addition of the page itself is still a point of contention (that appears to be close to a 50/50 split), are you guys saying you agree with the addition, or just that the page looks good?The page looks fine to me personally.
I'm fine with the page being added.I want to clarify, since the addition of the page itself is still a point of contention (that appears to be close to a 50/50 split), are you guys saying you agree with the addition, or just that the page looks good?