- 4,950
- 2,348
Do...Uh...yes it does? From how I see it, Empathic Manipulation is pretty different from Mind Manipulation.
Do you think your emotions exist outside your mind?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do...Uh...yes it does? From how I see it, Empathic Manipulation is pretty different from Mind Manipulation.
No, but it's a different subset. Manipulation of the mind and manipulation of a person's emotions are usually considered two separate abilitiesDo...
Do you think your emotions exist outside your mind?
For no good reason lolNo, but it's a different subset. Manipulation of the mind and manipulation of a person's emotions are usually considered two separate abilities
This is also true.I mean, on the flipside of that, I can't think of any instances where a character with anti-magic or something is able to kill immortals through that alone. Not all power null necessarily works as regen/immortality negation; We wouldn't assume someone like Asta can negate immortality or whatever despite power null being his whole gimmick.
The argument at hand is not centered around the commonality of immortality negation or regeneration negation in fictional works, but rather their categorization as forms of power nullification.I mean, on the flipside of that, I can't think of any instances where a character with anti-magic or something is able to kill immortals through that alone. Not all power null necessarily works as regen/immortality negation; We wouldn't assume someone like Asta can negate immortality or whatever despite power null being his whole gimmick.
That and Aizawa, who negates Quirks, which includes Hyper Regen (which iirc forced the Nomu to wait to Regen at USJ and Shiggy to wait to Regen as well), though I could be entirely wrong on those accounts as I haven't read MHA in forever.Akron's probably the only example of a powernull that negates Regeneration/Resurrection.
Do we not have large changes in the Wiki based on that reason alone? How it typically appears in fiction deciding how we treat abilities, which is why an ability like Time Stop is separate from general Time Manipulation despite being an obvious subcategory that truly needs no distinction other than most Fiction decides so?The argument at hand is not centered around the commonality of immortality negation or regeneration negation in fictional works, but rather their categorization as forms of power nullification.
Despite their frequent appearance as discrete abilities, they ultimately fall under the umbrella of a singular capability.
I must point out that using whataboutism does not prove effective in winning an argument. Even if I were to combine the pages on time stoppage and time manipulation, I would remain unfazed by such an attempt.Do we not have large changes in the Wiki based on that reason alone? How it typically appears in fiction deciding how we treat abilities, which is why an ability like Time Stop is separate from general Time Manipulation despite being an obvious subcategory that truly needs no distinction other than most Fiction decides so?
"Time Manipulation (sometimes called Chronokinesis) is the ability to control time itself. Examples include time travel, precognition, slowing down time, speeding up time, stopping time, etc. As time and space are connected, many users can also manipulate space."However, my only rebuttal to this argument is that slowing time does not equate to manipulating it.
Then why did you bring it up?Which is not the damn main topic, if it is manipulation, then I have no damn problem with them being refused, mate. Oh gosh.
TrueStupid dumb arguments
Those two are explicitly subset from power nullification, there is absolutely no reason for not listing under it. We ain't even saying the draft should not be there, the draft can be there, just list under its respective ability.If we are going with the whole "but this power is a subset of that power" route then why the heck do we even have listed all those powers in the wiki when in the end they all are a subset of Reality Warping?
But the entire basis on this page existing relies on following the standards. It's not whataboutism, it's looking at the blueprint of this very Wiki's Design, Philosophy, and Current Practices to make a conclusion. And that conclusion is that, based on how we have made decisions, (which operates by conforming to what a Majority of Fiction agree on), Regen and Immortality Neg should be separate. Based on how other pages that are arbitrary subsections of previously established powers, Regen and Immortality Neg should be separate. Based on the events that have happened in this wiki, (the High Godly revisions), we should have already HAD a Regen and Immortality Neg page as a separate thing. Based on the fact we already have it as a category/confirmed other power within the classification of the Wiki, we unofficially take the stance they are separate-Thus to accurately reflect our beliefs, they should officially be separate.So stop with whataboutism arguments, they are tiring.
hence adding it to power nullification section is going to have the same result as separating them.Especially for new users who join that click said link and it leads to the power nullification page. It causes issues with the clarity, at the end of the day the page should be altered to include the types of nullification abilities, not just an overall blanket page which is left vague.
I said I'm fine with either or. I didn't think the comment I made was that hard to understand? As long as the issue of clarification is taken care of I don't really care what alternatives are taken.hence adding it to power nullification section is going to have the same result as separating them.
Read above, I understand that. I'm really failing to understand the point of your reply to mine if we both agree on the same exact thing here.None is opposing his draft but fixing power nullification and add your drafts there as DT said is better and it won't be "vague" as you said.
It happens, don't sweat it. I probably could have been more clear myself tbh.I misunderstood it, because you somehow said you agree with OP 100% while OP does not want to merge it. My bad.