- 20,105
- 10,899
- Thread starter
- #241
Ok, though Regen negation is just getting merged with type 3 immortality negation so it’s not gonna matter in the long run.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Immortality Negation and Regeneration Negation pages
- Thread starter Theglassman12
- Start date
- Status
- 18,393
- 14,323
He hit him, and he usually regenerates those wounds, but the "god" negated them. I pretty much see it
- 20,105
- 10,899
- Thread starter
- #243
@ImmortalDread the timestamp was at a completely different part of the video
- 18,393
- 14,323
huh? When I clicked on it, it perfectly showed me the timestamp, lol
- 20,105
- 10,899
- Thread starter
- #245
Must’ve been some bug. Either way @Mr._Bambu @Antvasima Can I see how the coding for linking directly to the immortality negation section of power null works here?
- 20,105
- 10,899
- Thread starter
- #247
@Antvasima No that's not what I'm talking about, is there a way when you type in the code for power nullification that instead of showing the general power null page, it skips down to where Immortality Negation is in that page? If that's possible without causing a headache with coding then I wouldn't mind it being merged with power null, if that's not possible then having immortality negation is preferable imo.
Last edited:
- 5,637
- 3,655
[[Inorganic Physiology#Users|Inorganic Physiology]] will link to https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Inorganic_Physiology#Users
Or for Powernull
[[Power_Nullification#Types|Immortality Negation]] will link to https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Power_Nullification#Types
Since it is listed under Types it will only redirect to Types unless you put Immortality and Regeneration negation as another Heading or Sub Heading
- 20,105
- 10,899
- Thread starter
- #249
Then I’d be fine with it being merged into the power null page.
- 18,393
- 14,323
Do you need help on merging them?
- 18,393
- 14,323
Sure!
- 20,105
- 10,899
- Thread starter
- #253
@Antvasima Can I include the Hercules gif into the sub category too to have an example be there or no? Also yeah open the page please.
- 168,500
- 77,202
I have unlocked the two pages in question. Tell me here when you are done please.
Also, I personally do not mind if you add the Hercules gif animation, but it may deviate too much from our standard format for powers and abilities pages, so I am not certain.
- 18,393
- 14,323
Glass, before you insert it, I want to see how it looks like first
- 20,105
- 10,899
- Thread starter
- #256
@Antvasima here's the updated look, I moved the users around to make it less confusing
- 18,393
- 14,323
You added the resistance negation at last where it barely can be recognized, replace it under "the types"
- 18,393
- 14,323
I edited. It should be fine
- 5,637
- 3,655
Im pretty sure DT still disagrees with this notion
Why do you assume a High-Godly can do that if they have no feats of that in particular?
The reason why the reality being there is relevant is for the reasons I laid out. If you want to regenerate you have to do so somewhere. How do you plan to reconstruct a 3D body if the 3 dimensions you would usually use for that ceased to exist? As said, it's not impossible for a character to do that, but it doesn't just come for free. Feats should be required.
Just because he hasn't responded doesn't mean he agrees. I also still in disagreement with this without proper feat
And as Antvasima said. bureaucrat holds higher weigh when it comes to Powers and abilities in the site
- 20,105
- 10,899
- Thread starter
- #261
@ImmortalDread Resistance negation was already there.
@TheGreatJedi13 ok, he can still comment or just make another thread about this, and it’s been a week since he commented so if he’s not going to respond anytime soon we should just move on. Bureaucrats holding higher weight means jack shit here when Promestein, a former Bureaucrat agrees with this being a thing.
@TheGreatJedi13 ok, he can still comment or just make another thread about this, and it’s been a week since he commented so if he’s not going to respond anytime soon we should just move on. Bureaucrats holding higher weight means jack shit here when Promestein, a former Bureaucrat agrees with this being a thing.
- 5,637
- 3,655
And a 1:1 vote isn't conclusive in this case in terms of weight for a Bureaucrat
It comes without saying that Ability page revision would need to be properly evaluated and dismissing another Bureaucrat's contention because another agreed and a former one at that is quite uncanny for lack of better words.
As this affects the entire site simply going off with this is greatly concerning.
It comes with a responsibility to handle site abilities pages and you should have been aware of such things, especially with how there is a multitude of other Staff threads going on that would require their attention so disregarding their contention and proceeding with the revision without taking in mind their contention just because there wasn't a response within a week is in your part rather unscrupulous.
And to be honest. Promestein comments and responses were mostly about whether or not the page should exist or be merged not of what is the content contrary to DT who commented regarding the contents.
You introducing something new regarding regeneration is the main concern here regarding them being able to regenerate from the complete removal of the plane where they can do their regeneration. As this clearly isn't a standard nor a guideline present.
- 18,393
- 14,323
ya I fixed it now. No worries
- 168,500
- 77,202
It looks good to me. Thank you for helping out.
I created a redirect link from our former Immortality Negation page:
Immortality Negation
vsbattles.fandom.com
Should I do the same with our Resistance Negation page?
- 18,393
- 14,323
In my opinion, resistance negation should be merged as well. It still falls under power null
- 18,393
- 14,323
I added it since they are already logically and obviously under the same section.
If it is possible, simplely delete the existing page
- 168,500
- 77,202
It looks good to me. Thank you for helping out.
I created a redirect link from our former Immortality Negation page:
Immortality Negation
Should I do the same with our Resistance Negation page?
What do the rest of you think about this?
@Promestein
- 18,393
- 14,323
@Antvasima I assume we need soke valuable and sensitive input from staff members since there is new guideline has been added.
- 8,675
- 5,560
Uh I'd format it differently but that works
- 5,637
- 3,655
Donttalk has yet to respond back regarding this part that was added.
Why do you assume a High-Godly can do that if they have no feats of that in particular?
The reason why the reality being there is relevant is for the reasons I laid out. If you want to regenerate you have to do so somewhere. How do you plan to reconstruct a 3D body if the 3 dimensions you would usually use for that ceased to exist? As said, it's not impossible for a character to do that, but it doesn't just come for free. Feats should be required.
I don't remember any other staff having the same contention
this requires proper input as there was no set standard whether this is a thing or not in regeneration page
Last edited:
- 20,105
- 10,899
- Thread starter
- #274
@TheGreatJedi13 then he can make another thread on the matter. If he's not going to comment for over a week since his last response why are we not moving on with the discussion?
- 168,500
- 77,202
- 168,500
- 77,202
- 18,393
- 14,323
I don't think creating an additional thread is productive. The OP simply added new information, people and mostly staff members agreed for creating a new page, I doubt anyone evaulate the text.
Creating a new thread won't help much. Simply patiently wait for DT.
Creating a new thread won't help much. Simply patiently wait for DT.
- 20,105
- 10,899
- Thread starter
- #280
If DT’s not going to respond why wait? He can make another thread about this if he wants to.
- Status
Similar threads
