Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Superman, Goku, Naruto, a few Disney characters, Harry Potter.Antvasima said:Anyway, what is basically required is being a signature character with extreme levels of popularity and widespread appeal, but it isn't an exact science where exactly to draw the line.
If I remember correctly, One Piece is easily outselling both of them at least.Kepekley23 said:No, he is most definitely not. Sales don't mean popularity.
Goku and Naruto are the most popular Japanese comicbook characters in the world - by far. Most people in the American continent don't know anything about One Piece, that's for sure.
I suppose that is a good point. I am not sure if he qualifies then.Dragonmasterxyz said:Yes, but is he really iconic? Or is he just popular? Is he truly on the scale of say Goku or Mario or Superman in that category?
DMB 1 said:Also, may I ask how is Gilgamesh an iconic character? The first time I ever heard of him was when I studied him during 1st grade, and that's it.
Other than that, I've never heard of him being so popular or well-known, and the closest I got was because of this Gilgamesh, which shouldn't count.
Gilgamesh is the earliest known hero of human mythology itself, and has been well known for several thousand years. If that isn't long-lasting appeal, I do not know what qualifies.DMB 1 said:Also, may I ask how is Gilgamesh an iconic character? The first time I ever heard of him was when I studied him during 1st grade, and that's it.
Other than that, I've never heard of him being so popular or well-known, and the closest I got was because of this Gilgamesh, which shouldn't count.
Sales don't mean anything.Js250476 said:Yes One Piece is the best selling manga in the world so it has that going for it
It is a useful category for casual entry level visitors to this wiki who want to quickly browse for characters that they recognise. It is the reason why I created it in the first place. It increases our popularity in the long run.Dragonmasterxyz said:I feel like this category is going to become more trouble than it's worth.
ThisDMB 1 said:To my knowledge, an "Iconic character" is the one that you can just ask a random person on the street if they know or at least recognize.
They'd know the Greek deities and heroes, then some pop-culture characters such as Goku, Superman, the Ninja Turtles etcetera. Most people don't really know Gilgamesh as much, and he isn't as present in fictional works as much as other ancient mythological characters are.
Heck, when you talk about Gilgamesh, most people think of the one form the Fate series, except for people who studied his myth somewhere, like at school.
Zark2099 said:I still think one character per verse should apply, since if they are considered an "icon", they should at bare minimum solely represent their franchise wholely. 20 characters from the marvel universe, 3 different versions of the same person and some zeitgeist characters shouldn't happen in Iconic characters. It is just weird that there are 111 characters and counting considered as "iconic".
That's...part of the argument we're making. Most characters on the list follow a loose definition of "iconic" and are moreso just "notable".Ogbunabali said:Just gonna say that if Luffy isn't part of he Iconic Characters than 99% of the ones there shouldn't be there either.
Please tell me you don't mean Minecraft Steve....ZacharyGrossman273 said:I second steve taking the category
Minecraft as a game is "iconic"Dragonmasterxyz said:Is Steve really actually "iconic"?
A portion of casual Minecraft players could be argued not to even know that his name is Steve to begin with, considering only specific editions have that as the default name for the player and outside of that, only a specific interview has that be the name.Dragonmasterxyz said:Is Steve really actually "iconic"?
Basically this. But I think none of them belong on there.Edwardtruong2006 said: