- 8,229
- 3,949
You could just had said "platonic cave", and it would have gotten the point betterbetween 2 metaphysical realms that shape and define the physical worlds in every conceivable way.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You could just had said "platonic cave", and it would have gotten the point betterbetween 2 metaphysical realms that shape and define the physical worlds in every conceivable way.
The translation discrepancy got already debunked and Glass never addressed that bit further or anything.Not at all seeing how this is 1-A, let alone High 1-A. It seems to be the most generous and loose interpretation possible, shaded behind "context" that's just an exaggerated comparison. Not even accounting for the translation discrepancy brought up by Glass. Disagree with the upgrade, Ultima's and Theglassman12's reasonings make more sense to me.
I've read the thread, saying how it can mean X under certain context doesn't really change the underlying kanji translation.The translation discrepancy got already debunked and Glass never addressed that bit further or anything.
That's just the kanji on a vacuum, again, gotta quote myself on this:I've read the thread, saying how it can mean X under certain context doesn't really change the underlying kanji translation.
And even aside from that, this upgrade would still be flawed anyways.
Okay, a better explanation, it'd be like saying that the etymology of a word stands literally for its origin over its current use, especially when taking into account the combination of terms granting possible different interpretations, a good example is how the etymology for the word "atom" would translate to something that can't be divided, even though that evidently isn't true regarding its subject strictly speaking.
This seems reductive when Japanese is a highly contextual languageI've read the thread, saying how it can mean X under certain context doesn't really change the underlying kanji translation.
Again, that is not the argument, at no point did I make a claim saying “existing below R>F means you are beyond it.” The claim is that one world provides the ontological basis for the world below it and thus would be higher in quality. The SoA is not apart of the descending R>F hierarchy, if that was the case Riku wouldn’t need to obtain the power of waking. Hearts are already accepted as Type 1 concepts, which are platonic concepts. This isn’t my interpretation, in fact it was established far before I became active. Me not referencing the platonic cave is me being and idiot and not thinking of it, hearts are platonic in nature as again, accepted.Except that nothing in that blog remotely has anything that actually qualifies for R>F stuff, especially when all it is is just constantly 11-C downscaling and somehow extrapolating it into 1-A to High 1-A.
I don’t have a single shred of knowledge on CSAP so I can’t argue on what would get accepted there. I can, however, state that being beyond the concept of dimensionality is not required to gain 1-A. Especially when the point of the argument is that again, one world provides the platonic basis for the baseline reality.] a lot of this stuff sounds like stuff that would pass for 1-A in CSAP wiki, not the VSBW. Also again, Megaten has actual dimensionality being transcended at a conceptual level, KH doesn't. Also worlds that comprises of concepts that define reality does not even reach 1-A, what verse unironically does that by itself without any elaboration of dimensionality being surpassed? I can name several verses on the top of my head that has concepts defining reality but that doesn't translate to 1-A by default.