- 15,920
- 2,694
No evidence was ever provided for 1-A Afterlife tho, so that should be completely removed.Snip
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No evidence was ever provided for 1-A Afterlife tho, so that should be completely removed.Snip
Didn't you agree with DontalkDT arguments about it tho...?No evidence was ever provided for 1-A Afterlife tho, so that should be completely removed.
I said his arguments made sense. When I asked for evidence of the main crux of it, he provided none, meaning that 1-A is unfounded. Also, I never said I agreed with something as ridiculous as this "compromise".Didn't you agree with DontalkDT arguments about it tho...?
Which main crux of it?I said his arguments made sense. When I asked for evidence of the main crux of it, he provided none, meaning that 1-A is unfounded. Also, I never said I agreed with something as ridiculous as this "compromise".
@IonliositeWhich main crux of it?
That there's no evidence for 1-A in absolutely anything you posted, and that you completely made up stuff that downright doesn't exist as a way to justify it. Because, while what you said IS 1-A, you provided no evidence for your claims, and the evidence that HAS been provided shows nothing indicating what you said.Which main crux of it?
I obviously disagree. So let's try to locate which part you have an issue with. Tell me which of the following steps of reasoning you disagree with:That there's no evidence for 1-A in absolutely anything you posted, and that you completely made up stuff that downright doesn't exist as a way to justify it. Because, while what you said IS 1-A, you provided no evidence for your claims, and the evidence that HAS been provided shows nothing indicating what you said.
It really isn't. It's as basic of a reason as saying "Universe A is 6 dimensional. Universe A is part of the Multiverse. Character B created the Multiverse. Therefore character B created 6 dimensional space". It's basic reasoning based on what the novel tells us.Assuming that one of these universes has an infinite hierarchy, said hierarchy encompassing the entire Afterlifes, when absolutely nothing even imply that is a big jump of assumption. This is kinda the point I also brought before.
TLOI is above all stories, though. She is by nature one step above all stories. As such there is no story where TLOI is inferior to Akuto, meaning such a possible story doesn't exist. At best there is a story where a copy called TLOI is inferior to him. Other characters, like the extra-universal gods, actually became possibilities in his stories.After all, if we fully went that way, we would have to assume that there's a universe where TLOI is inferior to Akuto or suchlike since he created everything possible and all.
Yoshie, who has shown herself to be knowledgable on these matters, believed Akuto is able to do it. So we already have a reliable statement in that regard. Akuto and Brave, both likewise knowledgable, still seemed to consider him basically all powerful in his world even after story creation, indicating that there was no change in the idea that Akuto could do these things. I.e. even after all that testing, he hasn't found any limit to what Akuto can do in his own world.and as shown prior, the story stuff wasn't complete even when Akuto "abandonned", so it does make it a rating without actual proof here.
“What does it feel like to be able to do anything?” he asked after taking a breath.
“It feels like arriving at the farthest reaches of biological pleasure,” immediately replied Akuto.
He was opening up all possibilities in a literal sense. And all stories fell into chaos.Opening up all possibilities may have been a mistake.
The space itself was finite and the characters were finite, but the combinations were infinite. Opening up the possibilities was not just a concept. It actually released the walls of the world that supposedly existed within Akuto.
This was similar to further universes being born within him.
The props used naturally extended beyond him.
In other words, even the extra-universal gods became possibilities in the story.
As a result, all stories fell into chaos.
What this part tells us is that people stopped sharing a story immediately after Akuto's story creation. They didn't even share Akuto's story anymore. What one must understand is that all of reality is a story in Ichiban Ushiro no Daimao and that it has a philosophy of sentient beings only be able to think and experience in terms of stories.Until then, it could be said that the story was shared by all. They had all been playing a part in that story and thus the world had not been allowed to interfere with the stories other than Akuto’s.
So what if the people ceased to share the story?
(There is more regarding this in the forword of that volume btw.)To recognize reality, stories are needed. And this is because relationships with others are born here.
It was only now that mankind truly became “individuals”. Even if they could speak to each other, no kind of relationship could be formed if they did not share the same stories. The relationships of friends, enemies, and even strangers could not be established.
So that's why Akuto creating all stories simultaneously shows no results. Since he created the stories as isolated and not part of his own stories, he couldn't understand/recognize/have a relationship to the story. This entire stuff about separate stories that can't interact ends with this text:When the possibilities were infinite, stories instantly became impossible.
Countless isolated individuals were formed.
What is that about? I think it's about creating a story that is shared. Remember, in order to "test" a story as he does after this part he needs to share the story. If not, then you just have a chaos of stories that can't interact, like in the beginning of the chapter. Now Akuto creates stories as part of his own story, so that the story is shared with him and he can perceive and hence test it. I think that's why the author only now shows us, who we are reading Akuto's story, what kinds of stories he creates.First person.
Even so, stories…no, something even before that began.
I slept in darkness. No, I simply lay in darkness. I had given up. I did nothing.
I heard a voice.
It was distant. Or was it close? I could not tell.
Who was the voice calling for? Me? Someone else?
I had no way of finding out. It was even possible I had been the one to utter it.
It was possible I could confirm the existence of time for as long as the voice lasted. But it had no units. It was permanent. There was no guarantee the same word was not being repeated again and again. Even if a bell continued ringing for all eternity, there were no words to indicate a single, unique ringing of the bell. Which ring was it? Based on what division? In which eternity?
I decided to assume the voice was mine.
A story still had not been established. There was not even solitude here. After all, the first person was all that existed.
I produced sound.
There was sound.
I produced sound in order to speak.
There was speech.
There was language.
The correct answer could not be found.
It had no meaning.
It was not wrong or right.
It was meaninglessness. It was mistaken. It was a failure. Nothing existed there.
I moved my body.
There was movement.
Outside and inside. That division just barely existed.
There was movement.
Where to? Inside the space or outside the space? Heading inside led to nothingness and heading outside led to nothingness, but it was still a division. Even if a bell continued ringing for all eternity, there were no words to indicate a single, unique ringing of the bell. Which ring was it? Based on what division? In which eternity?
Even so, I counted.
I made a division.
The divisions increased.
I separated the heavens from the earth.
I moved.
I could move.
I could move the earth.
I stood. I stood using bones and the muscles of my back.
I hurt. But the pain was not everywhere. The pain was inside, but it was not outside.
I cried out.
It was meaninglessness. It was mistaken. It was a failure. That was all I had.
That mistaken noise was the only place a voice could be found. That error was all that was inside. The pain alone was there.
It was not there. I could not be sure. Mistakes were all I had.
So I made mistakes.
I made more mistakes.
I did whatever I could to make mistakes.
I made mistakes with a powerful will.
I made mistakes again and again.
And that led to…nothing.
I looked.
I mistook what I saw.
I mistook more of what I saw.
I did whatever I could to mistake what I saw.
I mistook what I saw with a powerful will.
I mistook what I saw again and again.
There was a mistake there.
I could see it.
I could see you.
Second person.
You stood in the light. No, you stood still in the light. You were there. You did nothing.
You heard a voice.
It was distant.
It was calling out to someone. You? Someone else?
You made a division between you and others, between here and there.
You decided to assume the voice came from “there”.
It may have been a story. You may have been solitary. After all, the voice may have come from someone other than you. After all, the second person existed.
You produced sound.
There was sound.
You produced sound in order to speak.
There was speech.
There was language.
The correct answer could not be found.
It had meaning.
It could also be mistaken.
You cried out.
It was meaningful. It was mistaken. It was a failure. You had all that.
That mistaken noise was the only place a voice could be found. That error was everywhere. The pain was there.
Mistakes were all you had.
So you made mistakes.
You made more mistakes.
You did whatever you could to make mistakes.
You made mistakes with a powerful will.
You made mistakes again and again.
And that led to…a story.
How the hell is asking for evidence of his claims unpolite and disrepecteful? That's basic burden of proof procedure. Being a "backbone" doesn't give him right to be able to pass off anything without evidence of it. Besides, he STILL hasn't provided any evidence of his previous claims, instead going on a long tangent that both Plank and Yuri already pointed out doesn't qualify for 1-A to begin with.I appreciate that you are back Ionliosite, but please be more polite and respectful to DontTalk. He is one of the greatest backbones of this community.
As I asked you before, can you please tell me which claim you are specifically are referring to and what your problem with it is?Besides, he STILL hasn't provided any evidence of his previous claims, instead going on a long tangent that both Plank and Yuri already pointed out doesn't qualify for 1-A to begin with.
I guess legal, now because he's been gone for exactly 19 days. well whatever,I hope he will come back...What? But that's illegal!
Respectively.Might just be me but those images don't work
Those small additions seem fine
I agree with allI guess legal, now because he's been gone for exactly 19 days. well whatever,I hope he will come back...
I want to make some small additions here;
- I think Kento's intelligence is higher than Genius. He is the person who built the ship in Act 12, so what are the features of this ship? These are the features;
The ship is able to fly, distribute the mana, and has its own energy unit, even implied to be the same system as the Brave suite and the Brave Suit, if I remember correctly, was one of the reasons Bouichirou was the Extraordinary Genius.
- Overwhelming Aura (Act 9)
3.Limited telekinesis with Keena (Act 6)4. Resistance to heat manipulation for Kei