- 2,318
- 1,302
Two threads were made separating the Super Perfect Cell feat from regular physicals, we don't know how Damage is gonna handle it so for now we'll just scale the characters without the featWhy is this one without the Solar System feat?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Two threads were made separating the Super Perfect Cell feat from regular physicals, we don't know how Damage is gonna handle it so for now we'll just scale the characters without the featWhy is this one without the Solar System feat?
Ahhh. Though I thought that the Buu Saga SSJ2+ characters would scale to/above it directly? Given how firmly established how they’re above SSJ2 Teen Gohan and SP. Cell they are?Two threads were made separating the Super Perfect Cell feat from regular physicals, we don't know how Damage is gonna handle it so for now we'll just scale the characters without the feat
It's vague, they're only established to be "stronger than Gohan" nothing more, it can just infer that they're overall stronger, as in both on a physical basis and with charged attacksAhhh. Though I thought that the Buu Saga SSJ2+ characters would scale to/above it directly? Given how firmly established how they’re above SSJ2 Teen Gohan and SP. Cell they are?
Last thing I remember is the proposal from others was that SSJ3 Goku would scale directly to/above it due to him having unprecedented levels of Ki.Ahhh. Though I thought that the Buu Saga SSJ2+ characters would scale to/above it directly? Given how firmly established how they’re above SSJ2 Teen Gohan and SP. Cell they are?
Well debunk thread I made has been done, check out Goku's raditz/saiyan/namek saga keysBut I'm waiting until the prior sagas are settled from the current ongoing revisions before I re-open that topic.
probably Omega too
Speaking of, Damage, since I now have the time to add DBS Bardock’s profile, how do I do whilst also connecting him to the “Articles About” tab?Last thing I remember is the proposal from others was that SSJ3 Goku would scale directly to/above it due to him having unprecedented levels of Ki.
But I'm waiting until the prior sagas are settled from the current ongoing revisions before I re-open that topic.
Anyone can post a new page you can do that; I'll update the template for Bardock.Speaking of, Damage, since I now have the time to add DBS Bardock’s profile, how do I do whilst also connecting him to the “Articles About” tab?
Alright. Renamed the page to be: Bardock (DBS Manga) to be consistent with othetr DBS manga pages.Done. Though I anticipated him to just be named “Super” instead of Manga due to the fact he’s got information from Dragon Ball Minus, Dragon Ball Super: Broly, and the Dragon Ball Super Manga.
I mean Minus was way before super, I think Manga makes enough senseDone. Though I anticipated him to just be named “Super” instead of Manga due to the fact he’s got information from Dragon Ball Minus, Dragon Ball Super: Broly, and the Dragon Ball Super Manga.
wait so what exactly were the disagreements about?Infinite universe DB Redux
Yep, we're bringing infinite universe back, I don't think the old counterarguments really hold up, so I made a blog explaining why infinite universe is actually correct and should be added back to the cosmology. Please do not discuss other things, such as what characters scale, ratings, etc...vsbattles.com
We were shown visually that it has an edge during u6 vs u7 arcwait so what exactly were the disagreements about?
bruh
The thread for upgrading Frieza's Planet Vegeta calc is here:Where's the thread for upgrading Frieza?
Super Shenron's summoning is a zoom out that shows the universe's literal appearencence, with said ligh even physically interacting with them as the scene goes onwait so what exactly were the disagreements about?
That's impossible, since a 3-A universe is literally timeless. Visuals aren't to be taken literally unless Goku is now galaxy sized.Super Shenron's summoning is a zoom out that shows the universe's literal appearencence, with said ligh even physically interacting with them as the scene goes on
this woul imply that the universes are not even low 2-C as they physically appear 3-A, this is the implication of such agreement at least, will make a thread about it later
in that case, the infinite universe thread staff agreed that the depiction in the u6 tournament arc was the literal appearence of themThat's impossible, since a 3-A universe is literally timeless. Visuals aren't to be taken literally unless Goku is now galaxy sized.
That's an appeal to authority,first. not everything staff says is true. One of them was also a calc member/content mod or whatever, which has as much value as a blue member, voting wise.in that case, the infinite universe thread staff agreed that the depiction in the u6 tournament arc was the literal appearence of them
Third, most of these depictions show things like 3-C sized universes, the lack of an afterlife, Kai realm etc. which are clearly not consistent with 99% of in-verse information. Fourth,some of them aren't even meant to be taken literally and are just for explanation purposes.That's an appeal to authority,first. not everything staff says is true. One of them was also a calc member/content mod or whatever, which has as much value as a blue member, voting wise.
my dude what i am saying is, if the wiki accepted that as the literal appearece to say "no" to infinite universe, then they would also need to accept it to say "no" to tier 2 as well, one needs consistency in beliefsThat's an appeal to authority,first. not everything staff says is true. One of them was also a calc member/content mod or whatever, which has as much value as a blue member, voting wise.
Consistency is not a thing on VBW. You know that,lol. It's all about favoritism, as much as people don't like to hear that.my dude what i am saying is, if the wiki accepted that as the literal appearece to say "no" to infinite universe, then they would also need to accept it to say "no" to tier 2 as well, one needs consistency in beliefs
about this galaxy argument......no? i don't a singular galaxy in the u6 sceneThird, most of these depictions show things like 3-C sized universes, the lack of an afterlife, Kai realm etc. which are clearly not consistent with 99% of in-verse information. Fourth,some of them aren't even meant to be taken literally and are just for explanation purposes.
Consistency is not a thing on VBW. You know that,lol. It's all about favoritism, as much as people don't like to hear that.
Yeah, I was mentioning a previous scene.about this galaxy argument......no? i don't a singular galaxy in the u6 scene
also why break up your points in multiple comments in sequence instead of a singular one? weird
Also I think other profiles like Goku Black, Grand Priest & Jiren should just be "Manga"/"Anime" not "DBS Manga"/"DBS Anime" since they don't appear in anything outside of DBS anime except for Super Hero which is a non-issue
Wait, the thread is closed, has it been agreed upon?The thread for upgrading Frieza's Planet Vegeta calc is here:
There isn't one on his Namek feat yetDBS: Destruction of Planet Vegeta, Frieza Upgrade
So this is the currently used calc for Frieza destroying planet Vegeta, it assumes that Vegeta is the size of earth, however this blog has now put forth a baseline for an average Planet in dragon ball using canon information The calculation for planet Vegeta is identical with one except, the...vsbattles.com
YeahWait, the thread is closed, has it been agreed upon?
Will this get edited then?Yeah
No we have to wait until the solar system scaling stuff gets sortedWill this get edited then?
I did mention this in thread. The claim was that these depictions were “abstractions” of the Universe and that it visually would look like as shown in U6vU7, which I attempted to refute by pointing out how in DB:Kai, DBZ (Toei), and DBS (Manga) all treat the Universe’s appearance as literal replications of the Cosmological Map (though obviously not “to scale” visually given Snake Way, the Kaio Planets, etc.)Third, most of these depictions show things like 3-C sized universes, the lack of an afterlife, Kai realm etc. which are clearly not consistent with 99% of in-verse information. Fourth,some of them aren't even meant to be taken literally and are just for explanation purposes.
When is it shown in Kai? I understand Toei and DBS Manga but I don't recall for KaiI did mention this in thread. The claim was that these depictions were “abstractions” of the Universe and that it visually would look like as shown in U6vU7, which I attempted to refute by pointing out how in DB:Kai, DBZ (Toei), and DBS (Manga) all treat the Universe’s appearance as literal replications of the Cosmological Map (though obviously not “to scale” visually given Snake Way, the Kaio Planets, etc.)
One of the Episode Title shots, I believe. But if you want to see it visually, here.When is it shown in Kai? I understand Toei and DBS Manga but I don't recall for Kai
that is impossible, you can't say that a major part of appearence(size and location of structures and the dimensions) is not literal while saying that it is the literal representation, that is self contradictoryI did mention this in thread. The claim was that these depictions were “abstractions” of the Universe and that it visually would look like as shown in U6vU7, which I attempted to refute by pointing out how in DB:Kai, DBZ (Toei), and DBS (Manga) all treat the Universe’s appearance as literal replications of the Cosmological Map (though obviously not “to scale” visually given Snake Way, the Kaio Planets, etc.)
"Appeal to authority" is not a fallacy that works here.That's an appeal to authority,first. not everything staff says is true. One of them was also a calc member/content mod or whatever, which has as much value as a blue member, voting wise.
Man, that reminds me of a few things...Consistency is not a thing on VBW. You know that,lol. It's all about favoritism, as much as people don't like to hear that.
Have you seen a model of the Solar System?that is impossible, you can't say that a major part of appearence(size and location of structures and the dimensions) is not literal while saying that it is the literal representation, that is self contradictory
Where can I join that thread?No we have to wait until the solar system scaling stuff gets sorted