.........first off, he based his vote only on the Cosmos scan as he
made clear in his voting post, second off, due to the former he only agreed with a "likely" rating and not a full agree on 2-C, you guys have made new arguments for it and new counter arguments have been made, both of which have been put in the OP, i have no idea why you guys are so opposed to someone asking a staff for a second opinion after 7 pages have passed with new arguments from both sides.....like, what harm is there for you guys to seeminly so desperately want me to not ask him "hey new stuff was brought up, can you say if your opinion has changed?" you do understand that he can also agree with it fully instead of only agreeing with a "likely" as he currently does, right?