Then it isnt
No it isn't? It's "hey DBSa has a bunch of contradictions, that exist within that medium, but no real evidence of adhering to the alleged model".
Do you people not know what a contradiction is? "Identical setting", and yet it's shown to be different multiple times, so it isn't.
Doesn't matter, he didn't make the anime. And authorial intent comes second to what's actually shown.
Dont matter if contradicted by the actual material.
Happens multiple times, with various support and other discrepancies, yet
zero evidence of the model being adhered to within that canon.
Yeah, we have, you're arguing against wiki standards at this point, not me.
Then word your arguments better.
Are you saying they're actually suns then? Because the point was that the anime can, and has, contradicted the very basis of your argument for even the most obvious things. Yet we don't pretend they're not moons because the guides say they're suns, they're simply moons now in the anime,
despite what any model or guide shows.
We don't act like they're any different, why pretend otherwise for this?
Yes, they're moons in toei too. Fortunately, that's the only fucky Toei has.
We get zoomed out planet shots, the moons def the "suns".