"I did see them, it's just contradicted. Some demons just...seem to have pretty bad regen. And all your proof is kinda denied by the fact that Beowulf has been hurt 3 times before, by 3 different people and he still cannot regen. He could not regen a single god damn eye ever since the old days. He could not regen his other eye by dante. He could not regen his head from being cut by Vergil. So yeah, all that proof...it's kind of useless if these guy is kinda notorious for having shit regen directly contradicting that regen scaling because of superior demons."
We only saw Beowulf fight three people: Sparda, Dante and Vergil (I'll let you guess what is their relation), you want to simply ignore obvious scalling and examples of multiple demons having high level regeneration because "Beowulf never showed it", Dante cutted one of his eyes and he didn't regenerated, the same Dante who negged multiple demon's regen in the series, Sparda, the man who Dante inherited his powers and Vergil,
which is the same case, those "different people" have a lot in common if you ask me, and Beowulf only fought them in the series, we never saw anything beyond that, how that nukes his regeneration ? Lore says demons in general have thanks to their physiology (and there is more), it's like you completely forgot that there is an ability called Regeneration Negation
That was a single graze he got before even beginning to fight Nero (in the literal meaning of the word). Ofc he would regen, still took him quite a hot minute to do that compared how notoriously fast these guys are known for regening.
I know he took his time, what I understand is why is that any relevant ? Not
all demons have shown instant regen in the series, only Dante and his family, which Urizen isn't quite part of. Sid took his time, Alice took her time, the list goes on
That's kind of a bad point considering the one with the demonic blood (which according to you is the only reason for regen) is just Urizen. So whether he gets a human half or stays fully demon, in terms of demon physiology he doesn't change. So he should have the same if not better regen than normal vergil. Your argument here relies on AP when you yourself proved that regen doesn't come from AP.
According to me, it's ONE of the reasons, there are others aka their magic power
as you can see here, now I know what you might thinking, if it's related to magic, then it's possible to nerf their healing, however like I said and showed, magic is
one of their ways, physiology also plays there and keep them having impressive regenerative abilities even when completely tired like all those scans (that I linked here) show. Also, their magic supply isn't related to their physical stamina, being tired doesn't mean being out of his own power,
as explained by DMC1 Official Guide, demons have their power/magic supply filled by inflicting pain and receiving pain, since pain is the main thing in the Demon World, basically a Lore explanation to how the DT gauge works, so being defeated, stomped and even attacking their opponents is giving them the magic used for regenerative abilities
I mean do we assume the author was smoking bananas when he said that they are wounded then? That argument goes both ways.
By one single statement debunked by all the feats in the whole series ? I don't think so
You have multiple statments of their regen existing in the first place, not that it can't be taxed if hurt over and over, this statement doesn't exist, however statement of the opposite does exist.
Too bad I showed you above, also we have feats proving that, but apparently only statements work ? Gotta question that logic...again
Hell, if i really wanted to i could argue to you that Dante being in a coma for a month in DMC5 is actually proof of that, since because of how knockouts work.
Yes, because Griffon knows exactly what Urizen (a completely new demon known by anyone in terms of power) is capable of, even V was surprised by his power, also knockouts are ignored by basically all of fiction with rare exceptions
Griffon being afraid that V was gonna kill dante by stabbing his head.
Stabbing his head by...Devil Sword Sparda ? The sword that has Sparda's powers ? The guy who neged Beowulf's regen ? Sure Griffon doesn't know everything, that sword is the most OP sword to ever appear until Devil Sword Dante, Griffon being afraid is also expected, btw, moments after he saw Dante stabbing himself and was freaking out, despite Dante and multiple other demons having regen enough for a simple stab, using this dramatic plot moments as "proof" for something shows how desperate you are, what's next ? Dante dying on gameplay being proof of no regen ?
Vergil and Dante stating that they were gonna "finish it" before being stopped by Nero, despite vergil having nothing that would put Dante down for good if the regen worked at 100% all the time. Etc etc etc.
Yeah Dante and Vergil who already negged regen before, curious huh ?
Yes, that actually helps what im saying. Hell, in the very first seconds of that video, we have Dante getting stabbed by Vergil's Yamato, falls to the ground, we see nothing on his clothes OR stomach, in other words by that logic we see no wound, but he clearly keeps bleeding as shown in the ground. So that moment alone is a good example of "we don't see it" doesn't mean "it's not there". Another example in that same video is at 2:00, Dante falls back to the ground after awakening his DT, we see no wound on his chest, when he falls to the ground he keeps on bleeding.
I mean, I hope you don't expect that healing a wound means the blood you lost disappears right ? Dante lost blood in the stab, lost blood when Vergil cut his arm, lost blood when Rebellion stabbed him, and he had some on his body in it when he fell to the ground. Also I believe you misunderstood me, I'm talking about his
CLOTHES, not his wounds, we indeed don't see a wound there or in other game, DMC 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, this last one with much better graphics.