- 18,929
- 27,717
- Thread starter
- #201
I can see that. I’m Bleach we have been adding tiering amps to characters if there’s evidence they have those amps even if they don’t use them in character. For example, Halibel never uses a Cero Oscuras (10x AP amp) but it’s stated all Espada can use it in Res, so we put it on her profile. I’m of the opinion that including OoC stuff is fine, especially for the purpose of indexing, and then in like a note or the weakness section of a character it can be denoted that they aren’t used in character. Gives room for people to use OoC match ups for added variety.I'm unfamiliar with the mechanics of Blut, so I'm not too sure. However, if using one is more or less equivalent to using the other mechanically, then the possibly should be okay. Although I'm not sure if it's really all that necessary to give out a an AP rating for an ability/amp that was never actually showcased, and is thus completely out of character to use in battle. Adding OoC things to the P&A section makes sense from an indexing standpoint since it's still an ability the character possesses, but I'm not sure about adding stuff to the AP/Tier sections and whatnot. For example, Kakashi can objectively activate the 1st Gate, but we don't give him a rating that's 5x higher than normal because it's simply something he's never used in battle, but he still gets Statistics Amplification on his P&A section because it's an ability he has.
All in all, I'm kinda neutral I guess. A possibly rating is harmless either way, so if I had to lean one way it'd be towards agreeing I suppose.