Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ichigo never mentions a girl that Riruka reminds him of. Your making things up.LordStarGazer said:Yet he mentions that he went to the valley for a girl that Riri reminds him of. You can't ignore that when it's right there.
That doesn't mean its canon? Again, the MoN Novel is a novelization of the movie. And it's untranslated. Novelizations aren't canon unless there's statements sayin they are (Star Wars).Frantzy12 said:The creator of that novel is the same as the canon EOS novel, We Do Knot Always Love You.
Boi, that literally has the *********** watermark on it, try again.Matthew Schroeder said:BTW, I just checked the Viz Translation and... Look!
The translation makes it clear that he isn't referencing any past girl. He's just talking about Riruka herself.
I doubled checked with the Brazilian translation and he doesn't reference anyone there either. He's talking about Riruka. The scanlation mentioning a past girl is making shit up.
People were saying he did. I just proved that was false.Hst master said:@Matt
I never said him mentioning Senna, but the event himself
Cool. But taking a vague statement of "I've been there before", which now is proven to have no potential reference to Senna, and then asserting that to mean the whole movie happened in the manga is speculation. It's a fan theory with no official confirmation.Frantzy12 said:I'd appreciate if you stop referring to peoples arguments as head-canon,because you yourself don't like it.
Yes the explanations differ slightly too.TheC2 said:Also, doesn't the Valley of Screams have a different explanation in the manga than it does the movie?
The movie says that there is one. The manga says there are mulitple like it.
It just kind of points that Kubo may have taken the idea because it was cool. He wouldn't be the first to pull something like that.
Is it just me or does anyone else find it weird that we exclude an author having any sort of meaningful say on what is canon in their verse and what isn't? If the man worked on the movie just as much as the anime and there is no contradictions and the two plots fit together like puzzle pieces, why do we just straight up ignore it?Matthew Schroeder said:Until there is:
An official statement saying it is Canon it won't be considered. A concept from the movie being referenced in the manga doesn't make it canon. There being a place where it could fit doesn't make it canon either.
I'm not sure what this argument is though? I request an Official Statement. There is none. Nobody is excluding the author completely.ProfessorLord said:Is it just me or does anyone else find it weird that we exclude an author having any sort of meaningful say on what is canon in their verse and what isn't? If the man worked on the movie just as much as the anime and there is no contradictions and the two plots fit together like puzzle pieces, why do we just straight up ignore it?
Shit do authors have to have their characters break the fourth wall and reference the movie before we consider it?